Abstract
Abstract. This study examines the factor structure of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) in a sample of 23,674 students at 26 American universities. The measurement invariance of the scale is also examined across gender, nationality, and sexual orientation. Exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) are used for data analysis. The results support the three-dimensional factor structure of the scale as well as full or partial measurement invariance across the groups. Results show that Item 13 (related to autonomy) demonstrates differential item functioning across gender.
References
2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397–438. doi: 10.1080/10705510903008204
(2015). Bayesian structural equation modeling with cross-loadings and residual covariances. Journal of Management, 41, 1561–1577. doi: 10.1177/0149206315591075
(1994). Relation of agency and communion to well-being: Evidence and potential explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 412–428. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.412
(2016a). A new look at the factor structure of the MHC-SF in Iran and the United States using exploratory structural equation modeling. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 72, 701–713. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22287
(2016b). Revisiting the empirical distinction between hedonic and eudaimonic aspects of well-being using exploratory structural equation modeling. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 2023–2036. doi: 10.1007/s10902-015-9683-z
(in press). The value of exploratory structural equation modeling in identifying factor overlap in the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF): A study with a New Zealand sample. Journal of Happiness Studies. doi: 10.1007/s10902-016-9767-4
(in press). The factor structure of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) in Serbia: An evaluation using exploratory structural equation modeling. Journal of Mental Health, doi: 10.1080/09638237.2016.1222058
(2006). The subjective well-being of America’s youth: Toward a comprehensive assessment. Adolescent & Family Health, 4, 3–11.
(2010). A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22, 471. doi: 10.1037/a0019227
(2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 85–110. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700
(2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 568–592. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568
(2011). The NEO Five-Factor Inventory: Latent structure and relationships with dimensions of anxiety and depressive disorders in a large clinical sample. Assessment, 18, 27–38. doi: 10.1177/1073191110382848
(2010). A comparative investigation of rotation criteria within exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 73–103. doi: 10.1080/00273170903504810
(2008). Core reporting practices in structural equation modeling. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 4, 83–97. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2007.04.003
(