The Family Relationships Index (FRI)
Multilevel Confirmatory Factor Analysis in an Italian Community Sample
Abstract
Abstract. Factor analysis of nested data is a challenge for researchers when they need to accurately identify the most appropriate latent configuration of self-report instruments. The present study used a multilevel framework to evaluate the factor structure underlying the 12-item three-factor Family Relationships Index (FRI), while adapting this instrument to the Italian context. By way of separating the two sources of variance (within and between families), results from 231 family members nested in 77 family triads supported a three-factor model (i.e., family cohesion, communication, and conflict resolution). Multilevel confirmatory factor analysis (MCFA) corroborated this model at the family level in particular. A one-factor model was also tested but resulted in being less suitable at both the individual (within) and family (between) level of analysis. Finally, we consider challenges in using such statistical techniques, while taking into account the FRI’s briefness and easiness to complete and score it in a practice-oriented assessment perspective.
References
1985). The relation of child age, gender, and number of children to the marital adjustment of wives. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 77–84. doi: 10.2307/352070
(1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332. doi: 10.1007/BF02294359
(2004). The relationship between respite care and child abuse potential in parents of children with developmental disabilities: A preliminary report. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 16, 273–285. doi: 1056-263X/04/0900-0273/0
(2000). Guidelines for the assessment of complicated bereavement risk in family members of people receiving palliative care. Melbourne, Australia: Centre for Palliative Care Press.
(1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74–94. doi: 10.1177/009207038801600107
(2010). Perception of family environment with Russian adolescent twins: Possible genotype-environment correlation. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 3, 412–430. doi: 10.11621/pir.2010.0019
(2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25, 3186–3191. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
(1999). Contributo per la revisione dell’adattamento italiano delle scale di ambiente familiare
([A contribution for the revision of the Italian adjustment of the Family Environment Scale] . Famiglia, Interdisciplinarietà e Ricerca, 4, 108–125.1980). The McMaster structured interview of family functioning. Providence, RI: Brown University Family Research Program.
(1984). The relationship of two dimensions of social support to the psychological well-being and social functioning of women with advanced breast cancer. Social Science and Medicine, 19, 831–837. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(84)90400-3
(2007). Predicting adolescents’ organized activity involvement: The role of maternal depression history, family relationship quality, and adolescent cognitions. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17, 221–244. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2007.00520.x
(1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1993). Cross-cultural comparison of family environments of Anglo-Australians, Italian-Australians, and Southern Italians. Psychological Reports, 72, 1051–1057. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1993.72.3.1051
(2015). Comparisons of family environment between homeless and non-homeless individuals with schizophrenia in Xiangtan, Hunan. Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry, 27, 175–182. doi: 10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.214162
(2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
(2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis in the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(2010). Multilevel confirmatory factor analysis of a scale measuring interagency collaboration of children’s mental health agencies. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 19, 27–40. doi: 10.1177/1063426610365879
(2005). Applying multilevel confirmatory factor analysis techniques to the study of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 149–167. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.009
(2005). The validity of the Family Relationships Index as a screening tool for psychological risk in families of cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology, 14, 546–554. doi: 10.1002/pon.876
(2007). Family mediators and moderators of treatment outcomes among youths with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 32, 194–205. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsj116
(1993). The role of family support in patient adaptation to Hodgkin’s disease, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of Oncology Social Workers, New York, NY
(2001). The Family System Test (FAST): Theory and application. London, UK: Brunner-Routledge.
(2014). Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Psychological Methods, 19, 72–91. doi: 10.1037/a0032138
(2003). Comparing parental distress, family functioning, and the role of social support caregivers with and without a child with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 28, 5–15. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/28.1.5
(2011). Can positive family factors be protective against the development of psychosis? Psychiatry Research, 186, 28–33. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.05.015
(2006). Quality of life and psychological adjustment in children and adolescents with neurofibromatosis type 1. The Journal of Pediatrics, 149, 348–353. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.04.025
(1989). The Family Relationships Index: Validity data. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45, 897–903. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198911)45:6
(1983). The quality of social support: Measures of family and work relationships. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 22, 157–162. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1983.tb00596.x
(2007).
(The treatment of missing data . In W. OuthwaiteS. P. TurnerEds., The SAGE handbook of social science methodology (pp. 208–224). London, UK: Sage. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12150Hox, J. J.Roberts, J. K.Eds.. (2011). Handbook of advanced multilevel analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
1998). Fit indexes in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
(2010). Structural equation modeling: Fit indices, sample size, and advanced topics. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20, 90–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2009.09.003
(2002). Family focused grief therapy: A model of family-centred care during palliative care and bereavement. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press. doi: 10.1080/02682620308657563
(1994). Psychological morbidity in the families of patients with cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 3, 47–56. doi: 10.1002/pon.2960030109
(1998). Family grief therapy: A preliminary account of a new model to promote healthy family functioning during palliative care and bereavement. Psycho-Oncology, 7, 14–25. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(199801/02)7:1
(2006). Family focused grief therapy: A randomized, controlled trial in palliative care and bereavement. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 1208–1218. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.7.1208
(1996). The Melbourne family grief study, I: Perceptions of family functioning in bereavement. American Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 650–658. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.5.650
(2014).
(Family Environment Scale . In A. C. MichalosEd., Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 2170–2173). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_9992015). How should family interdependence be studied? The methodological issues of non-independence. TPM: Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 22, 169–180. doi: 10.4473/TPM22.2.1
(2012). Problemi emotivo-comportamentali nei bambini tra 3 e 5 anni: assessment, fattori di rischio e fattori protettivi
([Emotional and behavioural problems of children between 3 and 5 years of age: Assessment, risk, and protective factors] . (Doctoral dissertation, Catholic University of Milan, Italy)2011). Il concetto di sé. Per un sistema di codifica e di analisi del Twenty Statements Test (TST)
([The self-concept. Towards a coding system and analysis of the Twenty Statements Test (TST)] . Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 38, 937–958. doi: 10.1421/361192001). Contesto familiare e malessere evolutivo in soggetti di età scolare
([Family environment and developmental maladjustment of school children] . Psicologia Clinica dello Sviluppo, 3, 451–468. doi: 10.1449/6371990). Conceptual and empirical approaches to developing family-based assessment procedures: Resolving the case of the Family Environment Scale. Family Process, 29, 199–208. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1990.00199.x
(1981, 1986, 1994, 2009). Manual for the Family Environment Scale. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
(2002). Family Environment Scale manual and sampler set: Development, applications, and research. Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden.
(1974). Preliminary manual for Family Environment Scale, Work Environment Scale, Group Environment Scale. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
(1991). Multilevel factor analysis of class and student achievement components. Journal of Educational Measurements, 28, 338–354. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1991.tb00363.x
(1994). Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 22, 376–398. doi: 10.1177/0049124194022003006
(1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
(2008). An introduction to multilevel modeling for social and personality psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 842–860. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00059.x
(2011). FACES IV and the circumplex model: Validation study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 3, 64–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00175.x
(2005). Psychosocial predictors of distress in parents of children undergoing stem cell or bone marrow transplantation. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 30, 139–153. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsi002
(2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514. doi: 10.1007/BF02296192
(2012). Family grief therapy: A vital model in oncology, palliative care, and bereavement. Family Matters, 90, 77–86.
(1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176344136
(1983). Family environment as a predictor of adjustment to metastatic breast carcinoma. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 1, 33–44. doi: 10.1300/J077v01n01_04
(2011). Psychometric properties of the French adaptation of the Family Relationships Index (FRI). L’Encéphale, 37, 110–118. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2010.04.008
(1993). Effects of parental adjustment on the adaptation of children with congenital or acquired limb deficiencies. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 14, 13–20.
(1985). An empirical assessment of the effects of cancer on family role functioning. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 3, 1–16. doi: 10.1300/J077v03n01_01
(2007). Portuguese version of the Family Environment Scale: Application and validation. Revista de Saúde Pública, 41, 419–426. doi: 10.1590/S0034-89102007000300014
(2014a). Editorial. Comments on item selection procedures. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 1–2. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000196
(2014b). Editorial. Stop and state your intentions! Let’s not forget the ABC of test construction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 239–242. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000228
(