Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Multistudy Report

An Ultra-Short Measure for Work Engagement

The UWES-3 Validation Across Five Countries

Published Online:October 17, 2017https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000430

Abstract

Abstract. The current study introduces an ultra-short, 3-item version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Using five national samples from Finland (N = 22,117), Japan (N = 1,968), the Netherlands (N = 38,278), Belgium/Flanders (N = 5,062), and Spain (N = 10,040) its internal consistency and factorial validity vis-à-vis validated measures of burnout, workaholism, and job boredom are demonstrated. Moreover, the UWES-3 shares 86–92% of its variance with the longer nine-item version and the pattern of correlations of both versions with 9 indicators of well-being, 8 job demands, 10 job resources, and 6 outcomes is highly similar with an average, absolute difference between correlations of only .02. Hence, it is concluded that the UWES-3 is a reliable and valid indicator of work engagement that can be used as an alternative to the longer version, for instance in national and international epidemiological surveys on employee’s working conditions.

References

  • Altena, N. & Van Yperen, N. (1998). Functieverandering na een reorganisatie. Effecten op relatieve deprivatie en werktevredenheid [Change in job positions following reorganization: Effects on relative deprivation and job satisfaction]. Gedrag en Organisatie, 11, 81–95. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bakker, A. B. & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13, 209–223. doi: 10.1108/13620430810870476 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bakker, A. B. & Oerlemans, W. (2011). Subjective well-being in organizations. In K. S. CameronG. M. SpreitzerEds., The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 178–189). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Beck, A. T. & Beck, R. W. (1972). Screening depressed patients in family practice. A rapid technique. Postgraduate Medicine, 52, 81–85. doi: 10.1080/00325481.1972.11713319 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Beehr, T. A., Walsh, J. T. & Taber, T. D. (1976). Relationship of stress to individually and organizationally valued states: Higher order needs as a moderator. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 41–47. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.61.1.41 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Burisch, M. (1984). Approaches to personality inventory construction: A comparison of merits. The American Psychologist, 39, 214–227. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.39.3.214 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Byrne, B. M. (2009). Structural equation modeling with AMOS (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S. & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work Engagement: A Quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64, 89–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cook, J. & Wall, T. (1980). New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfillment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53, 39–52. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1980.tb00005.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Costa, P. T.Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Crawford, E. R., Lepine, J. A. & Rich, B. L. (2010). Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: A theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 834–848. doi: 10.1037/a0019364 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • de Bruin, G. P. & Henn, C. M. (2013). Dimensionality of the 9-item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9). Psychological Reports, 112, 788–799. doi: 10.2466/01.03.PR0.112.3.788-799 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • de Lange, A. H., De Witte, H. & Notelaers, G. (2008). Should I stay or should I go? Examining longitudinal relations among job resources and work engagement for stayers versus movers. Work & Stress, 22, 201–223. doi: 10.1080/02678370802390132 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Elo, A. L., Skogstad, A., Dallner, M., Gamberale, F., Hottinen, V. & Knardahl, S. (2000). User’s guide for the QPSNordic: General Nordic Questionnaire for psychological and social factors at work. Copenhagen, Denmark: Nordic Council of Ministers. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Farndale, E., Beijer, S. E., Van Veldhoven, M. J., Kelliher, C. & Hope-Hailey, V. (2014). Work and organisation engagement: Aligning research and practice. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 1, 157–176. doi: 10.1108/JOEPP-03-2014-0015 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fisher, G. G., Matthews, R. A. & Gibbons, A. M. (2015). Developing and investigating the use of single-item measures in organizational research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21, 3–23. doi: 10.1037/a0039139 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Frese, M., Fay, D., Hilburger, T., Leng, K. & Tag, A. (1997). The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70, 139–161. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1997.tb00639.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Goodman, S. A. & Svyantek, D. J. (1999). Person-organization fit and contextual performance: Do shared values matter? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55, 254–275. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.1998.1682 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Grau, R., Salanova, M. & Peiró, J. M. (2000). Efectos moduladores de la autoeficacia en el estrés laboral [Moderation effects of self-efficacy on job stress]. Apuntes de Psicología, 18, 57–75. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Grzywacz, J. G. & Marks, N. F. (2000). Family, work, work-family spillover, and problem drinking during midlife. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 336–348. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00336.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hackman, J. R. & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159–170. doi: 10.1037/h0076546 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hu, Q., Schaufeli, W., Taris, T. W., Hessen, D. J., Hakanen, J., Salanova, M. & Shimazu, A. (2014). East is East and West is West and never the twain shall meet. Work engagement and workaholism across Eastern and Western cultures. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 6–24. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jackson, P. R., Wall, T. D., Martin, R. & Davis, K. (1993). New measures of job control, cognitive demand and production responsibility. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 753–762. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.78.5.753 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kahn, W. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692–724. doi: 10.2307/256287 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job demand, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 285–309. doi: 10.2307/2392498 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kessler, R. C., Barber, C., Beck, A., Berglund, P., Cleary, P. D., McKenas, D., … Wang, P. (2003). The World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ). Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 45, 156–174. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000052967.43131.51 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kristensen, T., Hannertz, H., Hogh, A. & Borg, V. (2005). The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) – A tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health, 31, 438–449. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.948 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kunin, T. (1955). The construction of a new type of attitude measure. Personnel Psychology, 9, 65–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1955.tb01189.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lehto, A. M. & Sutela, H. (2009). Three decades of working conditions. Findings of Finnish quality of work life surveys 1977–2008. Helsinki, Finland: Statistics Finland. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lindström, K., Hottinen, V. & Bredenberg, K. (2000). Työilmapiiri- ja hyvinvointibarometri, [The Healthy Organization Barometer]. Helsinki, Finland: Työterveyslaitos, Psykologian Osasto. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lindström, K., Hottinen, V., Kivimäki, M. & Länsisalmi, H. (1997). Terve Organisaatio -kysely. Menetelmän perusrakenne ja käyttö [The Healthy Organization Barometer]. Helsinki, Finland: Työterveyslaitos, Psykologian Osasto. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Loukidou, L., Loan-Clarke, J. & Daniels, K. (2009). Boredom in the workplace: More than monotonous tasks. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11, 381–405. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00267.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B. & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60, 541–572. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00083.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B. & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397–422. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mills, M. J., Culbertson, S. S. & Fullagar, C. J. (2011). Conceptualizing and measuring engagement: An analysis of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 519–545. doi: 10.1007/s10902-011-9277-3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nunnally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ouweneel, E., Le Blanc, P. & Schaufeli, W. B. (2013). Do-it-yourself: An online positive psychology intervention to promote positive emotions, self-efficacy, and engagement at work. Career Development International, 18, 173–195. doi: 10.1108/CDI-10-2012-0102 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Price, J. L. (1997). Handbook of organizational measurement. International Journal of Manpower, 18, 305–558. doi: 10.1108/01437729710182260 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Reijseger, G., Schaufeli, W. B., Peeters, M. C. W., Taris, T. W., van Beek, I. & Ouweneel, E. (2013). Watching the paint dry: Validation of the Dutch Bore-Out Scale. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 26, 508–525. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2012.720676. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York, NY: Basic Books. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80, 1–28. doi: 10.1037/h0092976 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sagie, A., Elizur, D. & Koslowski, M. (1996). Work values: A theoretical overview and a model of their effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 503–514. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Salanova, M., Cifre, E., Martínez, I. M., Llorens, S. & Lorente, L. (2011). Psychosocial risks and positive factors among construction workers. In S. ClarkeC. CooperR. BurkeEds., Occupational health and safety: Psychological and behavioral challenges (pp. 295–320). Farnham, UK: Gower. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Salanova, M., Del Líbano, M., Llorens, S. & Schaufeli, W. B. (2014). Engaged, workaholic, burned-out or just 9-to-5? Toward a typology of employee well-being. Stress and Health, 30, 71–81. doi: 10.1002/smi.2499 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Salanova, M., Schaufeli, W. B., Llorens, S., Peiró, J. M. & Grau, R. (2000). Desde el “burnout” al “engagement”: ¿una nueva perspectiva? [From “burnout” to “engagement”; a new perspective?]. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y las Organizaciones, 16, 117–134. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schaufeli, W. B. (2012). The measurement of work engagement. In R. R. SinclairM. WangL. E. TetrickEds., Research methods in occupational health psychology: Measurement, design, and data analysis (pp. 138–153). New York, NY: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schaufeli, W. B. (2015). Engaging leadership in the Job Demands-Resources Model. Career Development International, 20, 446–463. doi: 10.1108/CDI-02-2015-0025 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schaufeli, W. B. & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293–315. doi: 10.1002/job.248 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B. & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701–716. doi: 10.1177/0013164405282471 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., Maslach, C. & Jackson, S. E. (1996). Maslach Burnout Inventory – General Survey. In C. MaslachS. E. JacksonM. P. LeitnerEds., The Maslach Burnout Inventory – Test Manual (3rd ed. pp. 208–212). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Bakker, A. B. & Gonzales-Roma, V. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92. doi: 10.1023/A:1015630930326 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Shimazu, A. & Taris, T. W. (2009). Being driven to work exceptionally hard. The evaluation of a two-factor measure of workaholism in The Netherlands and Japan. Cross-Cultural Research, 43, 320–348. doi: 10.1177/1069397109337239 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schaufeli, W. B. & Taris, T. W. (2014). A critical review of the Job Demands-Resources Model: Implications for improving work and health. In G. BauerO. HämmigEds., Bridging occupational, organizational and public health: A transdisciplinary approach (pp. 43–68). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-5640-3_4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W. & Bakker, A. B. (2008). It takes two to tango: Workaholism is working excessively and working compulsively. In R. J. BurkeC. L. CooperEds., The long work hours culture. Causes, consequences and choices (pp. 203–226). Bingley, UK: Emerald. doi: 10.1016/B978-1-038-4.00009-9 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S. & Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism: A reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 67, 1063–1078. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1063 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Seppälä, P., Mauno, S., Feldt, T., Hakanen, J., Kinnunen, U., Tolvanen, A. & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). The construct validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Multisample and longitudinal evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 459–481. doi: 10.1007/s10902-008-9100-y First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B. & Rogers, R. W. (1982). The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological Reports, 51, 663–671. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1982.51.2.663 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Shimazu, A., Miyanaka, D. & Schaufeli, W. B. (2010). Work engagement from a cultural perspective. In S. AlbrechtEd., The handbook of employee engagement: Perspectives, issues, research and practice (pp. 364–372). Northampton, MA: Edwin Elgar. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Shimomitsu, T., Yokoyama, K., Ono, Y., Maruta, T. & Tanigawa, T. (1988). Development of a Novel Brief Job Stress Questionnaire. In S. KatoEd., Report of the research grant for the prevention of work-related diseases from the Ministry of Labour (pp. 107–115) (in Japanese). Tokyo, Japan: Ministry of Labour. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schwarzer, R. & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. In J. WeinmanS. WrightM. JohnsonEds., Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio, Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35–37). Windsor, UK: NFER-NELSON. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Terluin, B., Van Rhenen, W., Schaufeli, W. B. & De Haan, M. (2004). The Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ): Measuring distress in a working population. Work & Stress, 18, 187–207. doi: 10.1080/0267837042000297535 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tuomi, K., Ilmarinen, J., Jahkola, A., Katajarinne, L. & Tulkki, A. (1998). Work Ability Index (2nd ed.). Helsinki, Finland: Institute of Occupational Health. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vander Elst, T., De Witte, H. & De Cuyper, N. (2014). The Job Insecurity Scale: A psychometric evaluation across five European countries. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23, 364–380. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2012.745989 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • van Veldhoven, M., De Jonge, J., Broersen, S., Kompier, M. & Meijman, T. F. (2002). Specific relations between psychosocial job conditions and job-related stress: A three-level analytic approach. Work & Stress, 16, 207–228. doi: 10.1080/02678370210166399 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar