Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Brief Report

Reexamining the Factorial Validity of the 16-Item Scale Measuring Need for Cognition

Published Online:September 18, 2018https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000484

Abstract

Abstract. A growing body of studies has emphasized the need to consider method effects due to positively and negatively worded items for a better understanding of the factorial structure of psychological constructs. In particular, several researchers identified such method factors besides the content factor for various scales measuring Need for Cognition (NFC). However, regarding the factorial validity of the 16-item NFC scale developed by Bless, Wänke, Bohner, Fellhauer, and Schwartz (1994), only a one-factor structure without the inclusion of possible method factors has been examined so far. Therefore, we considered such method factors in a broader reexamination of the factorial validity of this measure by investigating a range of structural models in two samples (n = 830, n = 500). We found that a one-factor solution as proposed by Bertrams and Dickhäuser (2010) and Bless et al. (1994) did not fit the data, whereas the inclusion of method factors improved the model fit significantly. According to our results, the model including both the content factor and two uncorrelated method factors yielded the best model fit. In sum, our results provide an extended view of the factorial validity of the 16-item scale of NFC.

References

  • Amthauer, R., Brocke, B., Liepmann, D. & Beauducel, A. (2001). Intelligenz-Struktur-Test 2000 R (I-S-T 2000 R) – Handanweisung [Intelligence-Structure-Test 2000 R (I-S-T 2000 R) – Handbook]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bertrams, A. & Dickhäuser, O. (2010). University and school students’ motivation for effortful thinking: Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the German need for cognition scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26, 263–268. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000035 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Bless, H., Wänke, M., Bohner, G., Fellhauer, R. F. & Schwartz, N. (1994). Need for cognition: Eine Skala zur Erfassung von Engagement und Freude bei Denkaufgaben [Need for cognition: A scale measuring engagement and happiness in cognitive tasks]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 25, 147–154. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bors, D. A., Vigneau, F. & Lalande, F. (2006). Measuring the need for cognition: Item polarity, dimensionality and the relation with ability. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 819–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.09.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cacioppo, J. T. & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A. & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E. & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306–307. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Corwyn, R. F. (2000). The factor structure of global self-esteem among adolescents and adults. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 357–379. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.2000.2291 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fleischhauer, M., Enge, S., Brocke, B., Ullrich, J., Strobel, A. & Strobel, A. (2010). Same or different? Clarifying the relationship of need for cognition to personality and intelligence. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 36, 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209351886 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Forsterlee, R. & Ho, R. (1999). An examination of the short form of the need for cognition scale applied in an Australian sample. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 471–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131649921969983 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W. (1996). Positive and negative global self-esteem: A substantively meaningful distinction or artifactors? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 810–819. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.810 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Preckel, F. (2014). Assessing need for cognition in early adolescence: Validation of a German adaption of the Cacioppo/Petty Scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30, 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000170 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Quilty, L. C., Oakman, J. M. & Risko, E. (2006). Correlates of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and method effects. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1301_5 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rauch, W. A., Schweizer, K. & Moosbrugger, H. (2007). Method effects due to social desirability as a parsimonious explanation of the deviation from unidimensionality in LOT-R scores. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1597–1607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.10.035 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schriesheim, C. A. & Hill, K. D. (1981). Controlling acquiescence response bias by item reversals: The effect on questionnaire validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41, 1101–1114. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448104100420 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tomás, J. M. & Oliver, A. (1999). Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale: Two factors or method effects. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540120 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wang, J., Siegal, H. A., Falck, R. S. & Carlson, R. G. (2001). Factorial structure of Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale among crack-cocaine drug users. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0802_6 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar