Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Brief Report

Emotion Regulation Flexibility

Challenges and Promise of Using Ecological Momentary Assessment

Published Online:June 26, 2020https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000581

Abstract

Abstract. Emotion regulation (ER) flexibility, defined as shifting regulatory efforts based on contextual demands, has been proposed as central to well-being. However, it remains an elusive construct to capture. In this article, we highlight the promise and challenges of using ambulatory assessment to examine ER flexibility. We consider difficulties in assessing relevant contextual features and ER dynamics using ecological momentary assessment (EMA). The solutions offered include drawing on existing taxonomies of situational characteristics and ER strategies, adopting methods that passively track contextual features and enhance reliability, and leveraging the advantages of various sampling schemes based on target ER dynamics. Studying ER flexibility in vivo, as it naturally unfolds in daily life, is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of the contextual, dynamic nature of ER. Further work is needed developing theories to guide research on how and why specific aspects of the context might call for shifts in regulatory efforts.

References

  • Aldao, A., Sheppes, G., & Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation flexibility. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 39, 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-014-9662-4 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Blanke, E. S., Brose, A., Kalokerinos, E. K., Erbas, Y., Riediger, M., & Kuppens, P. (2019). Mix it to fix it: Emotion regulation variability in daily life. Emotion. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000566 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bonanno, G. A., & Burton, C. L. (2013). Regulatory flexibility: An individual differences perspective on coping and emotion regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 591–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613504116 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bonanno, G. A., Papa, A., Lalande, K., Westphal, M., & Coifman, K. (2004). The importance of being flexible: The ability to both enhance and suppress emotional expression predicts long-term adjustment. Psychological Science, 15, 482–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00705.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brans, K., Koval, P., Verduyn, P., Lim, Y. L., & Kuppens, P. (2013). The regulation of negative and positive affect in daily life. Emotion, 13, 926–939. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032400 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brown, N. A., Blake, A. B., & Sherman, R. A. (2017). A snapshot of the life as lived: Wearable cameras in social and personality psychological science. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 592–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617703170 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Catterson, A. D., Eldesouky, L., & John, O. P. (2017). An experience sampling approach to emotion regulation: Situational suppression use and social hierarchy. Journal of Research in Personality, 69, 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.04.004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cheng, C. (2001). Accessing coping flexibility in real-life and laboratory settings: A multimethod approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 814–833. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.5.814 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dejonckheere, E., Mestdagh, M., Houben, M., Rutten, I., Sels, L., Kuppens, P., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2019). Complex affect dynamics add limited information to the prediction of psychological well-being. Nature Human Behaviour, 3, 478–491. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0555-0 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eldesouky, L., & English, T. (2018). Another year older, another year wiser? Emotion regulation strategy selection and flexibility across adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 33, 572–585. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000251 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eldesouky, L., & English, T. (2019). Regulating for a reason: Emotion regulation goals are linked to spontaneous strategy use. Journal of Personality, 87, 948–961. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12447 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • English, T., Lee, I. A., John, O. P., & Gross, J. J. (2017). Emotion regulation strategy selection in daily life: The role of social context and goals. Motivation and Emotion, 41, 230–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-016-9597-z First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gates, K. M., & Molenaar, P. C. (2012). Group search algorithm recovers effective connectivity maps for individuals in homogeneous and heterogeneous samples. NeuroImage, 63, 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.026 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Greenaway, K. H., Kalokerinos, E. K., & Williams, L. A. (2018). Context is everything (in emotion research). Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12, e12393. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12393 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gross, J. J. (1998). Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 224–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.224 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Haines, S. J., Gleeson, J., Kuppens, P., Hollenstein, T., Ciarrochi, J., Labuschagne, I., … Koval, P. (2016). The wisdom to know the difference: Strategy-situation fit in emotion regulation in daily life is associated with well-being. Psychological Science, 27, 1651–1659. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616669086 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Himmelstein, P. H., Woods, W. C., & Wright, A. G. (2019). A comparison of signal- and event-contingent ambulatory assessment of interpersonal behavior and affect in social situation. Psychological Assessment, 31, 952–960. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000718 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kuppens, P., & Verduyn, P. (2017). Emotion dynamics. Current Opinion in Psychology, 17, 22–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.06.004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mehl, M. R., Pennebaker, J. W., Crow, M. D., Dabbs, J., & Price, J. H. (2001). The electronically activated recorder (EAR): A device for sampling naturalistic daily activities and conversations. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 33, 517–523. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195410 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ram, N., & Gerstorf, D. (2009). Time-structured and net intraindividual variability: Tools for examining the development of dynamic characteristics and processes. Psychology and Aging, 24, 778–791. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017915 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rauthmann, J. F., & Sherman, R. A. (2015). Ultra-brief measures for the situational eight DIAMONDS domains. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 32, 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000245 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sheppes, G., Scheibe, S., Suri, G., Radu, P., Blechert, J., & Gross, J. J. (2014). Emotion regulation choice: A conceptual framework and supporting evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 143, 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030831 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Southward, M. W., Altenburger, E. M., Moss, S. A., Cregg, D. R., & Cheavens, J. S. (2018). Flexible, yet firm: A model of healthy emotion regulation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 37, 231–251. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2018.37.4.231 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tamir, M. (2016). Why do people regulate their emotions? A taxonomy of motives in emotion regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868315586325 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Timmons, A. C., Baucom, B. R., Han, S. C., Perrone, L., Chaspari, T., Narayanan, S. S., & Margolin, G. (2017). New frontiers in ambulatory assessment: Big data methods for capturing couples’ emotions, vocalizations, and physiology in daily life. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 552–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617709115 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wild, B., Eichler, M., Friederich, H. C., Hartmann, M., Zipfel, S., & Herzog, W. (2010). A graphical vector autoregressive modelling approach to the analysis of electronic diary data. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-28 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar