Introducing New Open Science Practices at EJPA
References
2018). Open science training handbook, Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.1212496
(2014). Instead of “playing the game” it is time to change the rules: Registered Reports at AIMS Neuroscience and beyond. AIMS Neuroscience, 1(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.3934/Neuroscience.2014.1.4
(2012). Behavioral priming: It’s all in the mind, but whose mind? PLoS One, 7(1), Article e29081. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029081
(2017). The field of psychological assessment: Where it stands and where it’s going – A personal analysis of foci, gaps, and implications for EJPA. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 33(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000412
(2018). EJPA introduces registered reports as new submission format. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 34(4), 217–219. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000492
(2016). A multilab preregistered replication of the ego-depletion effect. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(4), 546–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616652873
(2018). Can psychology walk the walk of open science? The American Psychologist, 73(2), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000197
(2020). Generating codebooks to ensure the independent use of research data: Some guidelines. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 36(5), 721–729. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000620
(2019). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. PsyArXiv, https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/hs7wm
(2014). How to make more published research true. PLoS Medicine, 11(10), Article e1001747. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001747
(2020). Autism in Aotearoa: Is the RAADS-14 a valid tool for a New Zealand population? European Journal of Psychological Assessment, , 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000598
(2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(1), Article 21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021
(2015). Promoting an open research culture: Author guidelines for journals could help to promote transparency, openness, and reproducibility. Science, 348(6242), 1422–1425. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374
(2012). An open, large-scale, collaborative effort to estimate the reproducibility of psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 657–660. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612462588
. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716
. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149
(