The German Standard and Short Authentic and Hubristic Pride Scales
Psychometric Properties, Validity Testing, Self-Other Agreement, and Linguistic Correlates
Abstract
Abstract. The authentic and hubristic pride (A&HP) model is the domineering paradigm in pride research. Authentic pride (AP) comprises feelings of accomplishment and self-worth, whereas hubristic pride (HP) includes conceit and arrogance. We provide a German version of the A&HP scale (Tracy & Robins, 2007), the GAHPS. We found a good fit for a two-factor solution. Internal consistencies were high. Nomological validity was supported for personality, self-esteem, and narcissism (Study 1, N = 569), status (Study 2, N = 565), and other emotions (Study 3, N = 204). In Study 4 (N = 184), AP and HP had different associations with prosocial and antisocial behavior. We found high self-other agreement (109 dyads) for AP but not for HP. Further, people used different words to describe AP and HP when they described themselves and peers, thus suggesting that the two forms are associated with different linguistic styles. Finally, using an Ant Colony Optimization algorithm, we derived a short form for the scale. Researchers are advised to choose the standard or short scale, depending on the research purpose. This research broadens the validity testing of the A&HP model and, for the first time, provides linguistic correlates of the two forms of pride.
References
2013). Narcissistic admiration and rivalry: Disentangling the bright and dark sides of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(6), 1013–1037. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034431
(2006). On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling, 13(2), 186–203. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1302_2
(2020). Judging dispositions toward ridicule and being laughed at from short self-descriptions at zero-acquaintance: Testing self-other agreement, consensus, and accuracy. Journal of Research in Personality, 89, Article
(104016 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.1040161993).
(Alternative ways of assessing model fit . In K. A. BollenJ. S. LongEds., Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241920210020051959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016
(2010). Authentic and hubristic pride: Differential relations to aspects of goal regulation, affect, and self-control. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(6), 698–703.
(2010). Pride, personality, and the evolutionary foundations of human social status. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(5), 334–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.004
(2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
(2018). Psychopathy and pride: Testing Lykken’s hypothesis regarding the implications of fearlessness for prosocial and antisocial behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article
(185 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.001851993). Consensus, self‐other agreement, and accuracy in personality judgment: An introduction. Journal of Personality, 61(4), 457–476.
(2008). Die deutsche Version des Life-Orientation-Tests (LOT-R) zum dispositionellen Optimismus und Pessimismus
([The German version of the Life-Orientation Test (LOT-R) on dispositional optimism and pessimism] . Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie, 16(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1026/0943-8149.16.1.262020). Measuring internalized versus externalized luxury consumption motivations and consumers’ segmentation. Italian Journal of Marketing, 2020(1), 24–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43039-020-00002-9
(2017). The ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (2nd ed.). https://www.InTestCom.org
. (2017). Following the ants: Development of short scales for proactive personality and supervisor support by Ant Colony Optimization. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 33(6), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000299
(2014). Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3) a brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113514105
(2018). The MBESS R package (Version 4.4.3) [R package]. http://cran.r-project.org
(1979). Psychometrics and psychology. Academic Press.
(2008). Persönlichkeitsdiagnostik mit dem Neo-Fünf-Faktoren-Inventar: Die 30-Item-Kurzversion (NEO-FFI-30)
([Personality diagnostics with the Neo-Five Factor Inventory: The 30-Item short version] . Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie, 58(6), 238–245. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-986192021). It's all about power: Validation of trait and state versions of the German Personal Sense of Power Scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000642
(2021). Data, syntax, and materials to The German Standard and Short Authentic and Hubristic Pride Scales: Psychometric properties, validity testing, self-other agreement, and linguistic correlates. https://osf.io/eh7r4/
(2013). Messung des sozioökonomischen Status in der Studie zur Gesundheit Erwachsener in Deutschland (DEGS1)
([Measurement of socioeconomic status in the study on the Health of Adults in Germany (DEGS1)] . Bundesgesundheitsblatt-Gesundheitsforschung-Gesundheitsschutz, 56(5–6), 631–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-012-1663-42015a). The tango of two deadly sins: The social-functional relation of envy and pride. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(3), 453–472.
(2015b). Dispositional envy revisited: Unraveling the motivational dynamics of benign and malicious envy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(2), 284–294. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000026
(2019). Too fast, too straight, too weird: Non-reactive indicators for meaningless data in internet surveys. Survey Research Methods, 13(3), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2019.v13i3.7403
(2016). Authentic and hubristic pride as assessed by self, friends, and strangers. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(7), 690–696. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616649240
(2019). Scarcity or luxury: Which leads to adolescent greed? Evidence from a large-scale Chinese adolescent sample. Journal of Adolescence, 77, 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.10.002
(2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
(2014). Evidence for two facets of pride in consumption: Findings from luxury brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(4), 455–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2014.03.004
(2015). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. University of Texas at Austin.
(2009). When nonsense sounds happy or helpless: The Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(3), 500–516. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016063
(2018). A brief tale of the two faces of narcissism and the two facets of pride. Personality and Individual Differences, 126, 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.01.027
(2007). The resilient type: “Simply the best” or merely an artifact of social desirability? Psychology Science, 49(2), 150–167.
(2005). Prosocial behavior and religion: New evidence based on projective measures and peer ratings. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44(3), 323–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2005.00289.x
(2020).
(From self-consciousness to success: When and why self-conscious emotions promote positive employee outcomes . In L. YangR. CropanzanoC. DausV. Martinez-TurEds., The Cambridge handbook of workplace affect (pp. 414–425). Cambridge University Press.2004). Die Messung von Narzissmus als Persönlichkeitskonstrukt
([The assessment of narcissism as personality trait] . Diagnostica, 50(4), 202–218. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.50.4.2022018). Stuart: Subtests using algorithmic rummaging techniques (Version 0.8.0) [R package]. https://bitbucket.org/martscht/stuart
(2015). Dispositional greed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(6), 917–933. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000031
(2014).
(Collective pride and prejudice: A naturalistic study of the effects of group pride versus individual pride on attitudes to migrants following a national team victory . In G. B. SullivanEd., Understanding collective pride and group identity: New directions in emotion theory, research and practice (pp. 95–109). Routledge.2000). The Test of Self-Conscious Affect – 3 (TOSCA–3). George Mason University.
(2009). Authentic and hubristic pride: The affective core of self-esteem and narcissism. Self and Identity, 8(2–3), 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860802505053
(2004). Putting the self into self-conscious emotions: A theoretical model. Psychological Inquiry, 15(2), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1502_01
(2007). The psychological structure of pride: A tale of two facets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(3), 506–525. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.506
(2003). Eine revidierte Fassung der deutschsprachigen Skala zum Selbstwertgefühl von Rosenberg
([A revised version of the German adaptation of Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale] . Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 24(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1024/0170-1789.24.1.32016). The benefits of following your pride: Authentic pride promotes achievement. Journal of Personality, 84(5), 607–622. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12184
(2014). Deutscher Aggressionsfragebogen
([German Aggression Questionnaire] . GESIS.2012). Is pride a prosocial emotion? Interpersonal effects of authentic and hubristic pride. Cognition & Emotion, 26(6), 1084–1097. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2011.646956
(