Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Multistudy Report

Cultural Adaptation, Validation, and Psychometric Description of the Pictorial Empathy Test (PET) in the Spanish Population

Published Online:February 01, 2022https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000690

Abstract

Abstract: Research in psychology and social neuroscience distinguishes between dispositional and situational empathy for the cognitive and affective aspects of empathy. Yet, the Pictorial Empathy Test (PET) is one of the few brief tests focusing on situational affective empathy. This paper describes the adaptation of PET in a two-stage process, consisting of instrument translation and exploratory analysis of the construct in a university student sample, followed by confirmatory factor analysis and psychometric validation in a general population sample (Study 1, N = 79 and Study 2, N = 580). Our results indicate that the Spanish PET version constitutes a single factor structure with high internal consistency as well as high construct stability across genders and across in-person and online test administration setups. We report satisfactory convergent, discriminant, and nomological validity of the Spanish PET, as reported for the original version, in addition to when explored across new dimensions, like the Interpersonal Reactivity Index or in relation to age and prosocial tendencies. Based on the above, we discuss delineation of the distinct components of emotional empathy as measured by the instrument. The work presented supports the use of the Spanish PET version as a brief screening tool for state affective (emotional) empathy.

References

  • Alcorta-Garza, A., San-Martín, M., Delgado-Bolton, R., Soler-González, J., Roig, H., & Vivanco, L. (2016). Cross-validation of the Spanish HP-version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy confirmed with some cross-cultural differences. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1002. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ali, F., Amorim, I. S., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2009). Empathy deficits and trait emotional intelligence in psychopathy and Machiavellianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(7), 758–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.06.016 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baliyan, S., Cimadevilla, J. M., Bustillos, A., Escamilla, J. C., Leiman, M., Sandi, C., & Venero, C. (2021). Supplementary Materials for: Spanish version of the Pictorial Empathy Test. https://osf.io/yg378/?view_only=b2b024d0135d4e0cb5f4b5c33347962d First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:jadd.0000022607.19833.00 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 42(2), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:jadd.0000022607.19833.00 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Batson, C., & Powell, A. (2003). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In T. MillonM. J. LernerEds., Handbook of psychology: Personality and social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 463–484). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0513 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Borsboom, D., Rhemtulla, M., Cramer, A. O., van der Maas, H. L., Scheffer, M., & Dolan, C. V. (2016). Kinds versus continua: A review of psychometric approaches to uncover the structure of psychiatric constructs. Psychological Medicine, 46(8), 1567–1579. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291715001944 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Publications. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Caprara, G., Steca, P., Zelli, A., & Capanna, C. (2005). A new scale for measuring adults’ prosocialness. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.21.2.77 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Cattell, R. B. (1966). The screen test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2), 245–276. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cerny, C. A., & Kaiser, H. F. (1977). A study of a measure of sampling adequacy for factor-analytic correlation matrices. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 12(1), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr1201_3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chiesa, P. A., Liuzza, M. T., Acciarino, A., & Aglioti, S. M. (2015). Subliminal perception of others’ physical pain and pleasure. Experimental Brain Research, 233(8), 2373–2382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4307-8 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Christov-Moore, L., Simpson, E. A., Coudé, G., Grigaityte, K., Iacoboni, M., & Ferrari, P. F. (2014). Empathy: Gender effects in brain and behavior. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 46, 604–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Costanzo, M., & Archer, D. (1989). Interpreting the expressive behavior of others: The interpersonal perception task. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13(4), 225–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00990295 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cox, C. L., Uddin, L. Q., Di Martino, A., Castellanos, F. X., Milham, M. P., & Kelly, C. (2012). The balance between feeling and knowing: Affective and cognitive empathy are reflected in the brain’s intrinsic functional dynamics. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7, 727–737. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsr051 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Davidov, M., Zahn-Waxler, C., Roth-Hanania, R., & Knafo, A. (2013). Concern for others in the first year of life: Theory, evidence, and avenues for research. Child Development Perspectives, 7, 126–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12028 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10(85). First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Davis, M. H. (2015). Empathy and prosocial behavior. In D. A. SchroederW. G. GrazianoEds., The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior (pp. 282–306). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399813.013.026 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • De Vignemont, F., & Singer, T. (2006). The empathic brain: How, when and why? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 435–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.008 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Decety, J. (2010). The neurodevelopment of empathy in humans. Developmental Neuroscience, 32(4), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1159/000317771 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Decety, J., & Lamm, C. (2011). Empathy versus personal distress: Recent evidence from social neuroscience. In J. DecetyW. IckesEds., The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 199–214). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.003.0016 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Delacre, M., Lakens, D., & Leys, C. (2017). Why psychologists should by default use Welch’s t-test instead of Student’s t-test. International Review of Social Psychology, 30(1), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.82 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Derntl, B., Finkelmeyer, A., Toygar, T. K., Hülsmann, A., Schneider, F., Falkenberg, D. I., & Habel, U. (2009). Generalized deficit in all core components of empathy in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 108(1–3), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2008.11.009 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dziobek, I., Rogers, K., Fleck, S., Bahnemann, M., Heekeren, H. R., Wolf, O. T., & Convit, A. (2008). Dissociation of cognitive and emotional empathy in adults with Asperger syndrome using the Multifaceted Empathy Test (MET). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(3), 464–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0486-x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eisenberg, N., & Eggum, N. D. (2009). Empathic responding: Sympathy and personal Distress. In J. DecetyW. IckesEds., The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 71–83). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.003.0007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial development. In N. EisenbergW. DamonR. M. LernerEds., Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, personality development (6th ed., pp. 646–718). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0311 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Murphy, B., Karbon, M., Maszk, P., Smith, M., O’Boyle, C., & Suh, K. (1994). The relations of emotionality and regulation to dispositional and situational empathy-related responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(4), 776–797. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.776 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ferrando, P. J., & Chico, E. (2000). Adaptación y análisis psicométrico de la escala de deseabilidad social de Marlowe y Crowne [A Spanish version of the Marlowe and Crowne’s Social Desirability Scale]. Psicothema, 12(3), 383–389. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Garver, M. S., & Mentzer, J. T. (1999). Logistics research methods: employing structural equation modeling to test for construct validity. Journal of business logistics, 20(1), 33. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Rolph, E. A. (2009). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Education. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: Common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282485 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hoelter, J. W. (1983). The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness-of-fit indices. Sociological Methods & Research, 11(3), 325–344. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Israelashvili, J., Oosterwijk, S., Sauter, D., & Fischer, A. (2019). Knowing me, knowing you: emotion differentiation in oneself is associated with recognition of others’ emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 33(7), 1461–1471. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2019.1577221 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Israelashvili, J., Sauter, D., & Fischer, A. (2019). How well can we assess our ability to understand others’ feelings? Beliefs about taking others’ perspectives and actual understanding of others’ emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2475. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02475 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Khanjani, Z., Mosanezhad Jeddi, E., Hekmati, I., Khalilzade, S., Etemadi Nia, M., Andalib, M., & Ashrafian, P. (2015). Comparison of cognitive empathy, emotional empathy, and social functioning in different age groups. Australian Psychologist, 50(1), 80–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12099 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kyriazos, T. A. (2018). Applied psychometrics: sample size and sample power considerations in factor analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in general. Psychology, 9(08), 2207–2230. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lang, P. J., Greenwald, M. K., Bradley, M. M., & Hamm, A. O. (1993). Looking at pictures: Affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactions. Psychophysiology, 30(3), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb03352.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lee, I. A., & Preacher, K. J. (2013). Calculation for the test of the difference between two dependent correlations with one variable in common [Computer software]. http://quantpsy.org First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Li, C. H. (2016). The performance of ML, DWLS, and ULS estimation with robust corrections in structural equation models with ordinal variables. Psychological Methods, 21(3), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000093 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Light, S. N., Moran, Z. D., Swander, L., Le, V., Cage, B., Burghy, C., Westbrook, C., Greishar, L., & Davidson, R. J. (2015). Electromyographically assessed empathic concern and empathic happiness predict increased prosocial behavior in adults. Biological Psychology, 104, 116–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.11.015 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lindeman, M., Koirikivi, I., & Lipsanen, J. (2018). Pictorial Empathy Test (PET): An easy-to-use method for assessing affective empathic reactions. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 34(6), 421–431. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000353 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Little, T. D. (1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(1), 53–76. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3201_3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84–99. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Magalhães, E., Salgueira, A. P., Costa, P., & Costa, M. J. (2011). Empathy in senior year and first year medical students: A cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education, 11(1), 1–7. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mealey, L. (1995). The sociobiology of sociopathy: An integrated evolutionary model. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 18, 523–541. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00039595 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mehrabian, A., & Epstein, N. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality, 40(4), 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1972.tb00078.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mestre, M., Samper, P., Frías, M., & Tur, A. (2009). Are women more empathetic than men? A longitudinal study in adolescence. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12(1), 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600001499 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Montanari, P., Petrucci, C., Russo, S., Murray, I., Dimonte, V., & Lancia, L. (2015). Psychometric properties of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy‐Health Professional Student’s version: An Italian validation study with nursing students. Nursing & Health Sciences, 17(4), 483–491. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Murphy, B. A., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2019). Are self-report cognitive empathy ratings valid proxies for cognitive empathy ability? Negligible meta-analytic relations with behavioral task performance. Psychological Assessment, 31(8), 1062–1072. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000732 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Neumann, D. L., Chan, R. C., Boyle, G. J., Wang, Y., & Westbury, H. R. (2014). Measures of empathy: Self-report, behavioral, and neuroscientific approaches. In G. J. BoyleD. H. SaklofskeG. MatthewsEds., Measures of personality and social psychological constructs (pp. 257–289). Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Paulus, C. (2021). Is personal distress a part of empathy? A re-analysis of the multidimensional empathy concept. SciDok – Der Wissenschaftsserver der Universität des Saarlandes. https://doi.org/10.22028/D291-33706 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pérez-Albéniz, A., De Paúl, J., Etxeberría, J., Paz Montes, M., & Torres, E. (2003). Adaptación de Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) al español. Psicothema, 15(2), 267–272. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Redondo, I., & Herrero-Fernández, D. (2018). Adaptation of the Empathy Quotient (EQ) in a Spanish sample. Terapia Psicológica, 36(2), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48082018000200081 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Reniers, R. L., Corcoran, R., Drake, R., Shryane, N. M., & Völlm, B. A. (2011). The QCAE: A questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(1), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.528484 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schlegel, K., Grandjean, D., & Scherer, K. R. (2014). Introducing the Geneva Emotion Recognition Test: An example of Rasch-based test development. Psychological Assessment, 26(2), 666–672. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035246 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Seara-Cardoso, A., Neumann, C., Roiser, J., McCrory, E., & Viding, E. (2012). Investigating associations between empathy, morality and psychopathic personality traits in the general population. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(1), 67–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.08.029 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smith, Adam. (2006). Cognitive empathy and emotional empathy in human behavior and evolution. The Psychological Record, 56(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395534 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87(2), 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.87.2.245 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stel, M., Van Baaren, R. B., & Vonk, R. (2008). Effects of mimicking: Acting prosocially by being emotionally moved. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6), 965–976. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.472 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stueber, K. (2019). “Empathy”. In E. N. ZaltaEd., The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/empathy First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sun, B., Luo, Z., Zhang, W., Li, W., & Li, X. (2018). Age-related differences in affective and cognitive empathy: Self-report and performance-based evidence. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 25(5), 655–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2017.1360835 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sze, J. A., Gyurak, A., Goodkind, M. S., & Levenson, R. W. (2012). Greater emotional empathy and prosocial behavior in late life. Emotion, 12(5), 1129–1140. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025011 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tavakol, S., Dennick, R., & Tavakol, M. (2011). Psychometric properties and confirmatory factor analysis of the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy. BMC Medical Education, 11(1), 1–8. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Valentín, M. J. D., Abejar, M. G., Chacón, R. M. F., Parra, M. D. S., Rubio, M. E. L., & Jiménez, S. Y. (2019). Validation to the Spanish of the Jefferson Empathy Scale health professions student’s version and its psychometric properties in nursing students. Nurse education in practice, 40, Article 102629. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Westbury, H. R., & Neumann, D. L. (2008). Empathy-related responses to moving film stimuli depicting human and non-human animal targets in negative circumstances. Biological Psychology, 78(1), 66–74. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wieck, C., & Kunzmann, U. (2015). Age differences in empathy: Multidirectional and context-dependent. Psychology and Aging, 30(2), 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Williams, B., Brown, T., Boyle, M., & Dousek, S. (2013). Psychometric testing of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy Health Profession Students’ version with Australian paramedic students. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(1), 45–50. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Wilson, T. D., & Dunn, E. W. (2004). Self-knowledge: Its limits, value, and potential for improvement. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 493–518. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141954 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zahn-Waxler, C., & Radke-Yarrow, M. (1990). The origins of empathic concern. Motivation and Emotion, 14(2), 107–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991639 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zickfeld, J. H., Schubert, T. W., Seibt, B., & Fiske, A. P. (2017). Empathic concern is part of a more general communal emotion. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 723. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00723 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar