Measurement Does Not Take Place in a Legal Vacuum

References

• AERA, APA, & NMCE. (2014). Standards for educational & psychological testing. APA. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• DIN 33430. (2016). DIN 33430:2016-07, Anforderungen an Verfahren und deren Einsatz bei berufsbezogenen Eignungsbeurteilungen [Job related proficiency assessment]. Beuth Verlag. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• EFPA Board of Assessment. (2013). EFPA Review Model for the Description and Evaluation of Psychological and Educational Tests. http://www.efpa.eu/professional-development/assessment First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Emons, W. H., Sijtsma, K., & Meijer, R. R. (2007). On the consistency of individual classification using short scales. Psychological Methods, 12, 105–120. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• European Commission. (2009, March). Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Medical Devices. EC. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32009L0003&from=EN First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• European Commission. (2020, April). Medical Devices Regulation (MDR). EC. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02017R0745-20200424 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Evers, A., Sijtsma, K., Lucassen, W., & Meijer, R. R. (2010). The Dutch review process for evaluating the quality of psychological tests: History, procedure, and results. International Journal of Testing, 10, 295–317. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Fokkema, M., Iliescu, D., Greiff, S., & Ziegler, M. (2022). Machine learning and prediction in psychological assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 38(3), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000714 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

• Gignac, G. E. (2014). On the inappropriateness of using items to calculate total scale score reliability via coefficient alpha for multidimensional scales. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30(2), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000181 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

• Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2001). Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. In R. CudeckS. du ToitD. SörbomEds., Structural equation modeling: Present and future – Festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog (pp. 195–216). Scientific Software International. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Iliescu, D., Greiff, S., Ziegler, M., & Fokkema, M. (2022). Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and other demons. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 38(3), 163–164. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000713 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

• ISO 10667-1:2. (2020). Assessment service delivery – Procedures and methods to assess people in work and organizational settings. Beuth Verlag. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:10667:-1:ed-2:v1:en First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Lindley, P. A., & Bartram, D. (2012). Use of the EFPA test review model by the UK and issues relating to the internationalization of test standards. International Journal of Testing, 12, 108–121. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Michell, J. (2001). Teaching and misteaching measurement in psychology. Australian Psychologist, 36, 211–218. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Muñiz, J., Fernández-Hermida, J. R., Fonseca-Pedrero, E., Campillo-Álvarez, Á., & Peña-Suárez, E. (2011). Evaluación de tests editados en España [Evaluation of tests published in Spain]. Papeles del Psicólogo, 32, 113–128. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Nezlek, J. B. (2017). A practical guide to understanding reliability in studies of within-person variability. Journal of Research in Personality, 69, 149–155. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Revelle, W., & Garner, K. M. (2022). Measurement: Reliability, construct validation, and scale construction. In H. T. ReisC. M. JuddEds., Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology. Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74, 107–120. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103, 677–680. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Witteman, C. L. M., Van der Heijden, P., & Claes, C. (2018). Clinical assessment: Psychodiagnostic decision making. De Tijdstroom. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Ziegler, M. (2014). Stop and state your intentions! Let’s not forget the ABC of test construction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30(4), 239–242. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000228 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

• Zinbarg, R. E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I., & Li, W. (2005). Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and McDonald’s ω H: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70, 123–133. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar