Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000034

References

  • American Psychological Association . (2001). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, D.C.: Author. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ebner-Priemer, U. W., Trull, T. J. (2009). Ambulatory assessment: An innovative and promising approach for clinical psychology. European Psychologist, 14, 109–119. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Hoppmann, C. A., Riediger, M. (2009). Ambulatory assessment in lifespan psychology: An overview of current status and new trends. European Psychologist, 14, 98–108. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Klumb, P., Elfering, A., Herre, C. (2009). Ambulatory assessment in industrial/organizational psychology: Fruitful examples and methodological issues. European Psychologist, 14, 120–131. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Knoll, N., Schwarzer, R., Pfüller, B., Kienle, R. (2009). Transmission of depressive symptoms: A study with couples undergoing assisted-reproduction treatment. European Psychologist, 14, 7–17. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Kupfersmid, J. (1988). Improving what is published: A model in search of an editor. American Psychologist, 43, 635–642. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Luszczynska, A., Benight, C. C., Cieslak, R. (2009). Self-efficacy and health-related outcomes of collective trauma: A systematic review. European Psychologist, 14, 51–62. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • O’Brien, T. B., DeLongis, A., Pomaki, G., Puterman, E., Zwicker, A. (2009). Couples coping with stress: The role of empathic responding. European Psychologist, 14, 18–28. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Raufaste, É., Pompanon, C., Vautier, S. (2009). Focus of identity and motivation about the integration of Turkey into the European Union. European Psychologist, 14, 220–230. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Snodgrass, R. T. (2006). Single- versus double-blind reviewing: An analysis of the literature. Association for Computing Machinery: Special Interest Group on Management of Data, 35, 8–21. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar