Skip to main content
Special Section: Environmental Conservation

Strategies for Promoting Proenvironmental Behavior

Lots of Tools but Few Instructions

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000163

Environmental problems have their origins in human behavior, and as a result, any solution to environmental issues will require changes in behavior. While many disciplines in the social and behavioral sciences offer important perspectives on the behaviors linked with environmental problems, the study of the individual brings a focus on cognitive, social, and motivational processes that provides insights into effective ways to promote change. Psychological research on proenvironmental behavior dates back nearly 40 years, and within this rich body of empirical research are a number of well-established findings. Strategies such as prompts, commitments, feedback, social norms, incentives, and convenience have all been shown to effectively promote proenvironmental behavior – at least in some contexts, for some behaviors, and for some individuals. This article begins with a brief overview of these research findings, and then proceeds to examine the less-explored question about when various strategies work. The article concludes with recommendations for selecting an appropriate strategy for promoting behavior change, along with fruitful areas for future research.

References

  • Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 273–291. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Abrams, D., Wetherell, M., Cochrane, S., Hogg, M. A., Turner, J. C. (1990). Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 97–119. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Aitken, C. K., McMahon, T. A., Wearing, A. J., Finlayson, B. L. (1994). Residential water use: Predicting and reducing consumption. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 136–158. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • American Pet Products Association . (2012). National pet owners survey, 2011–2012. Washington, DC: Author. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Austin, J., Hatfield, D. B., Grindle, A. C., Bailey, J. S. (1993). Recycling in office environments: The effects of specific, informative cues. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 247–253. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bamberg, S., Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, & Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psych-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14–25. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bittle, R., Valesano, R., Thaler, G. (1979–1980). The effects of daily feedback on residential electricity usage as a function of usage level and type of feedback information. Journal of Environmental Systems, 9, 275–287. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cialdini, R. B., Demaine, L., Sagarin, B. J., Barrett, D. W., Rhoads, K. L., Winter, P. L. (2006). Managing social norms for persuasive impact. Social Influence, 1, 3–15. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Corral-Verdugo, V., Frias-Armenta, M., Tapia-Fonllem, C., Fraijo-Sing, B. (2012). Protecting natural resources: Psychological and contextual determinants of freshwater conservation. In S. Clayton (Ed.), Handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 581–597). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • De Kort, Y., McCalley, L. T., Midden, C. (2008). Persuasive trash cans: Activation of littering norms by design. Environment and Behavior, 40, 870–891. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • DeLeon, I. G., Fuqua, R. W. (1995). The effects of public commitment and group feedback on curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior, 27, 233–250. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dickerson, C., Thibodeau, R., Aronson, E., Miller, D. (1992). Using cognitive dissonance to encourage water conservation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 841–854. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dwyer, W. O., Leeming, F. C., Cobern, M. K., Porter, B. E., Jackson, J. M. (1993). Critical review of behavioral interventions to preserve the environment: Research since 1980. Environment and Behavior, 25, 275–321. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Geller, E. S. (1987). Applied behavior analysis and environmental psychology: From strange bedfellows to a productive marriage. In D. Stokols, I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology, Vol. 1, (pp. 361–388). New York, NY: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Geller, E. S. (2002). The challenge of increasing pro-environmental behavior. In R. Bechtel, A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 525–540). New York, NY: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Geller, E. S., Winett, R. A., Everett, P. B. (1982). Preserving the environment: New strategies for behavior change. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Haldeman, T., Turner, J. W. (2009). Implementing a community-based social marketing program to increase recycling. Social Marketing Quarterly, 15, 114–127. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hornik, J., Cherian, J., Madansky, M., Narayana, C. (1995). Determinants of recycling behavior: A synthesis of research results. Journal of Socio-Economics, 24, 105–127. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kaiser, F. G. (1998). A general measure of ecological behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 395–422. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kaiser, F. G., Byrka, K., Hartig, T. (2010). Reviving Campbell’s paradigm for attitude research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 351–367. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kaiser, F. G., Midden, C., Cervinka, R. (2008). Evidence for a data-based environmental policy: Induction of a behavior-based decision support system. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57, 151–172. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kaiser, F. G., Wilson, M. (2004). Goal-directed conservation behavior: The specific composition of a general performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1531–1544. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kantola, S., Syme, G., Campbell, N. (1984). Cognitive dissonance and energy conservation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 416–421. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Katzev, R., Cooper, L., Fisher, P. (1980–1981). The effect of feedback and social reinforcements on residential electricity consumption. Journal of Environmental Systems, 10, 215–227. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Katzev, R., Johnson, T. (1987). Promoting energy conservation: An analysis of behavioral research. Boulder, CO: Westview. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kotler, P., Lee, N. R. (2011). Social marketing: Influencing behaviors for good (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lokhorst, A. M., van Dijk, E., Staats, H. (2009). Public commitment making as a structural solution in social dilemmas. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 400–426. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Matthies, E., Klöckner, C. A., Preissner, C. L. (2006). Applying a modified moral decision making model to change habitual car use: How can commitment be effective?. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55, 91–106. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McKenzie-Mohr, D. (2011). Fostering sustainable behavior: An introduction to community-based social marketing (3rd ed.). Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McKenzie-Mohr, D., Lee, N., Schultz, P. W., Kotler, P. (2012). Social marketing to protect the environment: What works. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Midden, C., Kaiser, F., McCalley, T. (2007). Technology’s four roles in understanding individual’s conservation of natural resources. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 155–174. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nichols Kearns, J. (2011, September). Doo diligence: A study of San Diegians pet waste habits. Paper presented at the annual CASQ meeting, Lake Tahoe, CA. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nolan, J., Schultz, P. W. (in press). Prosocial behavior and environmental action. In D. Schroeder, W. Graziano (Eds.), Handbook of prosocial behavior. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nolan, J., Schultz, P. W., Cialdini, R. B., Griskevicius, V., Goldstein, N. (2008). Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 913–923. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oceja, L., Berenguer, J. (2009). Putting text in context: The conflict between pro-ecological messages and anti-ecological descriptive norms. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12, 657–666. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Osbaldiston, R., Schott, J. P. (2012). Environmental sustainability and behavioral science: Meta-analysis of proenvironmental behavior experiments. Environment and Behavior, 44, 257–299. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schultz, P. W. (1999). Changing behavior with normative feedback interventions: A field experiment of curbside recycling. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 25–36. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schultz, P. W. (2002). Knowledge, education, and household recycling: Examining the knowledge-deficit model of behavior change. In T. Dietz, P. Stern (Eds.), New tools for environmental protection (pp. 67–82). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schultz, P. W. (2010). Making energy conservation the norm. In K. Ehrhardt-Martinez, J. Laitner (Eds.), People-centered initiatives for increasing energy savings. Washington, DC: ACEEE Retrieved from www.aceee.org/people-centered-energy-savings First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schultz, P. W., Kaiser, F. G. (2012). Promoting proenvironmental behavior. In S. Clayton (Ed.), Handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 556–580). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schultz, P. W., Oskamp, S., Mainieri, T. (1995). Who recycles and when? A review of personal and situational factors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 105–121. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schultz, P. W., Tabanico, J., Rendón, T. (2008). Normative beliefs as agents of influence: Basic processes and real-world applications. In R. Prislin, W. Crano (Eds.), Attitudes and attitude change (pp. 385–409). New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sherif, M. (1966). In common predicament: Social psychology of intergroup conflict and cooperation. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Shrum, L. J., Lowrey, T., McCarty, J. (1994). Recycling as a marketing problem: A framework for strategy development. Psychology and Marketing, 11, 393–416. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Staats, H., Wit, A., Midden, C. (1996). Communicating the greenhouse effect to the public: Evaluation of a mass media campaign from a social dilemma perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 45, 189–203. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Steg, L., Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 309–317. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thogersen, J. (2004). A cognitive dissonance interpretation of consistencies and inconsistencies in environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 93–103. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Verplanken, B., Walker, I., Davis, A., Jurasek, M. (2008). Context change and travel mode choice: Combining the habit discontinuity and self-activation hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 121–127. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vining, J., Ebreo, A. (2002). Emerging theoretical and methodological perspectives on conservation behavior. In R. Bechtel, A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 541–558). New York, NY: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Werner, C. M., Turner, J., Shipman, K., Twitchell, F. S., Dickson, B. R., Bruschke, G. V., von Bismark, W. B. (1995). Commitment, behavior, and attitude change: An analysis of voluntary recycling. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 197–208. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Werner, C., Brown, B., Gallimore, J. (2010). Light rail use is more likely on “walkable” blocks: Further support for using micro-level environmental audit measures. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 206–214. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Winett, R. A. (1978). Prompting turning-out lights in unoccupied rooms. Journal of Environmental Systems, 6, 237–241. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar