Interviewing to Detect Deception
Abstract
DePaulo et al.’s (2003) meta-analysis of verbal and nonverbal cues to deception showed that cues to deception are faint and unreliable. If liars do not spontaneously display diagnostic cues to deceit, a logical step is to make sure that investigators elicit or enhance such cues in interviews through specific interview technique. Such interview techniques were scarce in the nonverbal and verbal cues to deception domain, but recently researchers have developed alternative protocols that have their roots in cognition and are based on the assumption that questions can be asked that are more difficult for liars to answer than for truth tellers. They will be discussed in the first part of this article. Traditionally, lie detection in a forensic context concentrated on police-suspect interview settings. However, in the wake of high-profile international terrorist attacks, the importance of identifying terrorist networks and gathering intelligence about the activities of such groups has become paramount. Deception detection in intelligence interviews differs in several ways from deception detection in traditional police-suspect interviews and requires innovative deception research. In the second part of this article we discuss the emerging literature in this domain.
References
(2011). Augmenting ACID with affective details to assess credibility. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 3, 141–158.
(1993). Police interview techniques. British Journal of Criminology, 33, 325–352.
(1989). Trivial persuasion in the courtroom: The power of (a few) minor details. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 669–679.
(2011). Differential effectiveness of the cognitive interview in a simulation of a testimony. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 17, 473–489. doi: 10.1080/10683160903321540
(2012). Comparative analysis of true and false statements with the source monitoring model and the cognitive interview: Special features of the false accusation of innocent people. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 18, 913–928. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2011.589387
(2006). Accuracy of deception judgements. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 214–234.
(2006). Approaching truth: Behavioral science lessons on educing information from human sources. In Intelligence Science Board. Educing information. Interrogation: Science and Art (pp. 17–43). Washington, DC: National Defense Intelligence College.
(2011). Impacts of psychological science on national security agencies post-9/11. American Psychologist, 66, 495–506.
(2010). The investigative interviewing of children and other vulnerable witnesses: Psychological research and working/professional practice. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 5–24.
(1996). Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory, 6, 203–242.
(2005). Processes underlying deception: An empirical analysis of truths and lies when manipulating the stakes. Journal of Interviewing and Offender Profiling, 2, 195–202.
(2009). The contributions of prefrontal cortex and executive control to deception: Evidence from activation likelihood estimate meta-analyses. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 1557–1566.
(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 155–159.
(2002). Interview techniques and the assessment of statement credibility. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 287–300.
(2007). Vividness and spontaneity of statement detail characteristics as predictors of witness credibility. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 25, 1–26.
(2008). Human factors of homeland security. In , Reviews of human factors and ergonomic, Vol. 3, (pp. 79–110). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
(1990). Questions to be answered, research to be done, knowledge to be applied. In , Origins of terrorism: Psychologies, ideologies, theologies, states of mind (pp. 247–260). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(2012). Lying and executive control: An experimental investigation using ego depletion and goal neglect. Acta Psychologica, 140, 133–141.
(1992). Nonverbal behavior and self-presentation. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 203–243.
(1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 979–995.
(2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74–118.
(2012). Social indicators of deception. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 54, 4577–4588.
(1985). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics and marriage. New York, NY: Norton.
(2004). Liking is doing: The effects of goal pursuit on automatic evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 557–572.
(2010). Interviewing cooperative witnesses. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 25–38.
(1992). Memory-enhancing techniques in investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas.
(2006). The effects of varied retrieval cues on reminiscence in eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 723–739.
(2006). The cognition of deception: The role of executive processes in producing lies. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monograhs, 132, 197–214.
(2008). A new theoretical perspective on deception detection: On the psychology of instrumental mind-reading. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14, 189–200.
(2014). Preventing future crimes: Identifying markers of true and false intent. European Psychologist, 19, 195–206. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000202
(2013). Eliciting cues to deception by tactical disclosure of evidence: The first test of the Evidence Framing Matrix. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 18, 341–355. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02047.x
(2007). Guilty and innocent suspects’ strategies during interrogations. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 13, 213–227.
(2006). Strategic use of evidence during police interrogations: When training to detect deception works. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 603–619.
(1997). The cognitive interview and lie detection: A new magnifying glass for Sherlock Holmes? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 55–68.
(1998). Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 659–671.
(2008). The Behavioral Analysis Interview: Clarifying the practice, theory and understanding of its use and effectiveness. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 10, 101–118.
(1994). Differentiation of truthful and deceptive criminal suspects in behavioral analysis interviews. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 39, 793–807.
(2013). Criminal interrogation and confessions (5th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
(1970). Divided attention: A vehicle for monitoring memory processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 164–171.
(2013). Who should I look at? Eye contact during collective interviewing as a cue to deceit. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 19, 661–671. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2013.793332
(2010). Interviewing suspects: Practice, science, and future directions. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 39–56.
(2008, April 29). Airport security: Keep your shoes on and tell the truth. In Homeland Security Today. Retrieved from www.hstoday.us/index.php?id=483&cHash=081010&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=3019
(2008). Tell me what happened: Structured investigative interviews of child victims and witnesses. Chichester, UK/Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
(2012). Sorting the liars from the truth tellers: The benefits of asking unanticipated questions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 107–114.
(2012). Drawing on liars’ lack of cognitive flexibility: Detecting deception through varying report modes. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 601–607. doi: 10.1002/acp.2837
(2011). Using sketch-drawing to induce inconsistency in liars. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 16, 253–265. doi: 10.1348/135532510X501775
(2010). People lie for a reason: Three experiments documenting the principle of veracity. Communication Research Reports, 27, 271–285.
(2011). Intelligence gathering post-9/11. American Psychologist, 66, 532–541.
(2006). Police officers’ judgements of veracity, tenseness, cognitive load and attempted behavioural control in real life police interviews. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 12, 307–319.
(2002). Suspects, lies and videotape: An analysis of authentic high-stakes liars. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 365–376.
(1999). The activation of unrelated and cancelled intentions. Memory & Cognition, 27, 320–327.
(1997). The generation of deceptive messages: Laying the groundwork for a viable theory of interpersonal deception. In , Message production: Advances in communication theory (pp. 91–126). Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2011, August). Evidence-based approaches to forensic interviewing and credibility assessment. Paper presented at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center, Brunswick, GA, USA
(2012). Interview and interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 2012, 13. doi: 10.4073/csr.2012.13
(2010). The cognitive interview: A meta-analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 16, 340–372.
(1993). The incidence, antecedents and consequences of the use of the right to silence during police questioning. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 3, 30–47.
. (2003). The polygraph and lie detection. Committee to Review the Scientific Evidence on the Polygraph. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
(2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen’s d, and r . Law & Human Behavior, 29, 615–620.
(2014). Mapping’ deception in adolescents: Eliciting cues to deceit through an unanticipated spatial drawing task. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 19, 179–188. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02068.x
(1969). Effect of varying channel capacity on stimulus detection and discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 82, 520–526.
(2011). The black banners: The inside story of 9/11 and the war against al-Qaeda. New York, NY: Norton.
(2001). Behavioural and functional anatomical correlates of deception in humans. Neuroreport: For Rapid Communication of Neuroscience Research, 12, 2849–2853.
(2006). Paraverbal indicators of deception: A meta-analytic synthesis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 421–446.
(2010). Assessment criteria indicative of deception (ACID): Replication and gender differences. The Open Criminology Journal, 3, 23–30.
(2012). Overcoming roadblocks to reform. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 134–135.
(2003). Temporal construction. Psychological Review, 110, 403–421.
(2012). Learning to lie: Effects of practice on the cognitive costs of lying. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 526.
(2011). The ease of lying. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 908–911.
(2013). When interference helps: Increasing executive load to facilitate deception detection in the concealed information test. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 146 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00146
(2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities (2nd ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
(2006). Detecting deception by manipulating cognitive load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 141–142.
(2008). A cognitive load approach to lie detection. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 5, 39–43.
(2012). Eliciting cues to deception and truth: What matters are the questions asked. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 110–117.
(2011). Outsmarting the liars: Towards a cognitive lie detection approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 28–32.
(2010). Pitfalls and opportunities in nonverbal and verbal lie detection. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11, 89–121.
(2012). Collective interviewing of suspects. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 41–44.
(2010). Drawings as an innovative and successful lie detection tool. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 587–594. doi: 10.1002/acp/1627
(2003). Deceptive responses and detecting deceit. In , Malingering and illness deception: Clinical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 348–362). Oxford, UK: University Press.
(2006). Information-gathering vs. accusatory interview style: Individual differences in respondents’ experiences. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 589–599.
(2008). Increasing cognitive load to facilitate lie detection: The benefit of recalling an event in reverse order. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 253–265.
(2012). Can I take your picture? Undercover interviewing to detect deception. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 18, 231–244.
(2012). Is anyone out there? Drawings as a tool to detect deception in occupations interviews. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 18, 377–388.
(2013). Advancing lie detection by inducing cognitive load on liars: A review of relevant theories and techniques guided by lessons from polygraph-based approaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 14.
(2003). Cognitive mechanisms underlying lying to questions: Response time as a cue to deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 755–774.
(2005). Lying person-to-person about live events: A cognitive framework for lie detection. Personnel Psychology, 58, 141–170.
(2012). Have you been there before? The effect of experience and question expectedness on lying about intentions. Acta Psychologica, 141, 178–183.
(1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of group mind. In , Theories of group behavior (pp. 185–208). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
(2010). Field training and testing of interview and elicitation methods. Fairborn, OH: Klein Associates Division of Applied Research Associates (Final Report prepared under Contract W91CRB-09-C-0082 for US ARMY REDCOM Acquisition Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD).
(1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In , Advances in experimental social psychology, 14, (pp. 1–57). New York, NY: Academic Press.
