Cyberbullying and Cyber Victimization as Online Risks for Children and Adolescents
Abstract
Abstract. Cyberbullying is one example of a psychosocial developmental phenomenon caused by mediatization, a meta-process that increasingly shapes everyday practices and social relationships via mediating technologies and media organizations. Research on cyberbullying started less than two decades ago and has grown exponentially during the last few years. Despite the large body of evidence, the research field still is in its “forming” phase, and there are still major topics of debate. The main goal of this paper is to discuss some of the major challenges, identify major research gaps, and give some directions for future research. Summarizing the main findings from meta-analyses and systematic reviews, topics like definition and measurement, theoretical perspectives, risk and protective factors, developmental patterns, as well as prevention and intervention of cyberbullying and cyber victimization are discussed, and promising avenues for future research are outlined.
References
2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27–51. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135231
(2015). “Am I at risk of cyberbullying”? A narrative review and conceptual framework for research on risk of cyberbullying and cybervictimization: The risk and needs assessment approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.05.014
(2013). Cyberbullying assessment instruments: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.11.022
(2019). Cyberhate: A review and content analysis of intervention strategies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.05.006
(1979). Ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
(1994).
(Ecological models of human development . In T. HusenT. N. PostlethwaitheEds., International encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., pp. 1643–1647). Elsevier Sciences.2020). Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among children and adolescents: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. Telematics and Informatics, 49, Article 101362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101362
(2016). Effects of the cyberbullying prevention program media heroes (Medienhelden) on traditional bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 42, 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21637
(2020). An international systematic review of cyberbullying measurements. Computers in Human Behavior, 113, Article 106485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106485
(2012). The ConRed program: An evidence-based practice. Communicar, 23, 129–138. https://doi.org/10.3916/c39-2012-03-03
(2015). Structural validation and cross-cultural robustness of the European Cyberbullying Intervention Project Questionnaire. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.065
(2016). Impact of the ConRed program on different cyberbullying roles. Aggressive Behavior, 42, 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21608
(2009). Cyberbullying versus face-to-face bullying – A theoretical and conceptual review. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217, 182–188. https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.182
(2007). Poly-victimization: A neglected component in child victimization. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31, 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.06.008
(2019). Are cyberbullying intervention and prevention programs effective? A systematic and meta-analytical review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 134–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.07.002
(2021). What works in anti-bullying programs? Analysis of effective intervention components. Journal of School Psychology, 85, 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2020.12.002
(2009). Traditional bullying and cyberbullying: Identification of risk groups for adjustment problems. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217, 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.205
(2010). Definition and measurement of cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 4, Article 1.
(2012).
(Motives for bullying others in cyberspace: A study on bullies and bully-victims in Austria . In Q. LiD. CrossP. K. SmithEds., Cyberbullying in the global playground: Research from international perspectives (pp. 263–284). Wiley-Blackwell.2015). Prevention of cyberbullying and cybervictimization: Evaluation of the ViSC Social Competence Program. Journal of School Violence, 14(1), 87–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.963231
(2016). Effectiveness and sustainability of the ViSC Social Competence Program to prevent cyberbullying and cyber-victimization: Class and individual level moderators. Aggressive Behavior, 42, 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21631
(2020). A tool for investigating the differential functions of aggressive behavior in the face-to-face and cyber context: Extending the Cyber-Aggression Typology Questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior, 46(5), 380–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21894
(2017). Exposure to online hate in four nations: A cross-national consideration. Deviant Behavior, 38, 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2016.1196985
(2012). A review of research on bullying and peer victimization in school: An ecological system analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 26, 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.03.003
(2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1073–1137. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618
(2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.017
(2019). A developmental approach to cyberbullying: Prevalence and protective factors. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.02.009
(2009). On the mediation of everything. ICA presidential address 2008. Journal of Communication, 59, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01401.x
(2019). Translating knowledge into interventions: An “individual by context” approach to bullying. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16(3), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2018.1564273
(2009). Cyberbullying definition and measurement – Some critical considerations. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217, 230–232. https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.230
(2011). The measurement of cyberbullying: Dimensional structure and relative item severity and discrimination. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14, 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0002
(2012). Empowering students against bullying and cyberbullying: Evaluation of an Italian peer-led model. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 6, 314–321.
(2012). Introduction: Cyberbullying: Development, consequences, risk, and protective factors. The European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 163–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2011.652833
(2012). Cyberbullying: An overrated phenomenon? European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 520–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.682358
(2018). Some problems with cyberbullying research. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 19, 139–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.04.012
(2012). Knowing, building and living together on Internet and social networks: The ConRed cyberbullying prevention program. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 6, 303–313.
(2016). Evidence-based intervention against bullying and cyberbullying: Evaluation of the NoTrap! Program in two independent trials. Aggressive Behavior, 42, 194–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21636
(2019). Social inequality, childhood and the media. A longitudinal study of the mediatization of socialization. Palgrave Macmillian/Springer Nature.
(2013). Toward a conceptual model of motive and self-control in cyber-aggression: Rage, revenge, reward, and recreation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(5), 751–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9936-2
(2017). Disentangling functions of online aggression: The Cyber-Aggression Typology Questionnaire (CATQ): Cyber-Aggression Typology Questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior, 43(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21663
(2013). Electronic victimization: Correlates, antecedents, and consequences among elementary and middle school students. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 42, 442–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2012.759228
(2018). Cyberbullying and cyber victimization within a cross-cultural context: A study of Canadian and Tanzanian adolescents. Child Development, 89(1), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12829
(2012). The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.024
(2013).
(Definitions of bullying and cyberbullying: How useful are the terms? . In S. BaumanD. CrossJ. WalkerEds., Routledge monographs in mental health. Principles of cyberbullying research: Definitions, measures, and methodology (pp. 26–40). Routledge/Taylor Francis Group.2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact on secondary school pupils. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 376–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x
(2018). Implementing intervention research into public policy – The “I3-Approach”. Prevention Science, 19, 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0638-3
(2021). The role of intrapersonal, interpersonal, family and school level variables in predicting bias-based cybervictimization. Journal of Early Adolescence. Advance online article. https://doi.org/10.1177/02724316211010335
(2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 7(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295
(2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.014
(2019). The moderation of online disinhibition and sex on the relationship between online hate victimization and perpetration. Cyberpsychology, Behaviour, and Social Networking, 22, 300–306. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0551
(2020). How do adolescents cope with cyberhate? Psychometric properties and socio-demographic differences of a coping with cyberhate Scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106167
(2019). Understanding the overlap between cyberbullying and cyberhate perpetration: Moderating effects of toxic online disinhibition. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 29, 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.2116
(2003). Off-campus, harmful online student speech. Journal of School Violence, 2, 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1300/J202v02n01_04
(2019). Validation of a cyberbullying and victimization measure among elementary school-aged children. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 36, 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-018-0583-z
(2013). Effects of the KiVa antibullying program on cyberbullying and cybervictimization frequency among Finish youth. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 42, 820–833. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2013.787623
(2014). Prevention 2.0: Targeting cyberbullying @ school. Prevention Science, 15, 879–887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-013-0438-y
(2016). Cross-national prevalence of traditional bullying, traditional victimization, cyberbullying and cyber-victimization: Comparing single-item and multiple-item approaches of measurement. International Journal of Developmental Science, 10, 21–32. https://doi.org/0.3233/DEV-150173
(2015). Declines in efficacy of anti-bullying programs among older adolescents: Theory and a three-level meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 37, 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.005
(