Skip to main content
Articles

Brief Versions of the NEO-PI-3

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.28.3.116

Abstract. Self-report (Form S) and observer rating (Form R) versions of two short forms of the NEO Personality Inventory-3 (NEO-PI-3) were evaluated. The NEO Five-Factor Inventory-3 is a 60-item instrument that assesses the five factors. The NEO-PI-3 First Half consists of the first 120 items of the NEO-PI-3, selected to optimally assess its 30 facet scales. Internal consistencies were systematically lower for the brief scales than for the parent scales, but both brief instruments replicated the factor structure and showed cross-observer validity. They appeared to work well in both adolescent and adult samples, and adequately in a middle school-age sample. Norms for the NEO-FFI-3 are provided and it was shown that NEO-PI-3 norms can be used for NEO-PI-3 First Half scores if they are simply doubled. Uses of the NEO-PI-3 First Half are discussed.

References

  • Becker, G. (2006). NEO-FFI scores in college men and women: A view from McDonald's unified treatment of test theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 911–941 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P.T., Jr., McCrae, R.R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P.T., Jr., McCrae, R.R. (1989). The NEO-PI/NEO-FFI manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P.T., Jr., McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P.T., Jr., McCrae, R.R., Martin, T.A. in press Incipient adult personality: The NEO-PI-3 in middle school-aged children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Digman, J.M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Egan, V., Deary, I., Austin, E. (2000). The NEO-FFI: Emerging British norms and an item-level analysis suggest N, A, and C are more reliable than O and E. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 907–920 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Frazier, T.W., Naugle, R.I., Haggerty, K.A. (2006). Psychometric adequacy and comparability of the short and full forms of the Personality Assessment Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 18, 324–333 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gosling, S.D., Rentfrow, P.J., Swann, W.B., Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haven, S., ten Berge, J.M.F. (1977). Tucker's coefficient of congruence as a measure of factorial invariance: An empirical study. (Heymans Bulletin No. 290 EX). University of Groningen First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Herzberg, P.Y., Brahler, E. (2006). Assessing the Big-Five personality domains via short forms: A cautionary note and a proposal. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 139–148 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • McCrae, R.R., Costa, P.T., Jr. (1989). Rotation to maximize the construct validity of factors in the NEO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 107–124 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCrae, R.R., Costa, P.T., Jr. (2004). A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 587–596 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCrae, R.R., Costa, P.T., Jr., Martin, T.A. (2005). The NEO-PI-3: A more readable Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84, 261–270 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCrae, R.R., Costa, P.T., Jr., Martin, T.A., Oryol, V.E., Rukavishnikov, A.A., Senin, I.G., et al., (2004). Consensual validation of personality traits across cultures. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 179–201 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCrae, R.R., Martin, T.A., Costa, P.T., Jr. (2005). Age trends and age norms for the NEO Personality Inventory-3 in adolescents and adults. Assessment, 12, 363–373 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCrae, R.R., Zonderman, A.B., Costa, P.T., Jr., Bond, M.H., Paunonen, S.V. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 552–566 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meyer, G.J., Finn, S.E., Eyde, L.D., Kay, G.G., Moreland, K.L., Dies, R.R., et al., (2001). Psychological testing and psychological assessment. American Psychologist, 56, 128–165 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Morey, L. (1991). Personality Assessment Inventory: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mullins-Sweatt, S.N., Jamerson, J.E., Samuel, D.B., Olson, D.R., Widiger, T.A. (2006). Psychometric properties of an abbreviated instrument of the five-factor model. Assessment, 13, 119–137 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Paunonen, S.V., Ashton, M.C. (2001). Big-Five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 524–539 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rammstedt, B., John, O.P. (2005). Kurzversion des Big Five Inventory (BFI-K): Entwicklung und Validierung eines ökonomischen Inventars zur Erfassung der fünf Faktoren der Persönlichkeit [Short version of the Big Five Inventory (BFI-K): Development and validation of an economic inventory for assessment of the five factors of personality]. Diagnostica, 51, 195–206 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Reise, S.P., Henson, J.M. (2000). Computerization and adaptive administration of the NEO-PI-R. Assessment, 7, 347–364 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Saucier, G. (1998). Replicable item-cluster subcomponents in the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70, 263–276 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shock, N.W., Greulich, R.C., Andres, R., Arenberg, D., Costa, P.T., Jr., Lakatta, E.G., et al., (1984). Normal human aging: The Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (NIH Publication No. 84-2450). Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, G.T., McCarthy, D.M., Anderson, K.G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12, 102–111 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Trobst, K.K., Wiggins, J.S., Costa, P.T., Jr., Herbst, J.H., McCrae, R.R., Masters, H.L., III. (2000). Personality psychology and problem behaviors: HIV risk and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 68, 1233–1252 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar