Personality and Skin Conductance Responses to Reward and Punishment
Influence on the Iowa Gambling Task Performance
Abstract
For several years now, the somatic aspect of emotions has been regarded as a major factor in the decision-making process. A large body of literature has investigated this issue, within the somatic marker hypothesis perspective, using the classical Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). Many studies reported an influence of clinical and differential factors, including personality, on IGT performance. On the other hand, personality appears to modulate the emotional responses as a function of valence (i.e., responses to rewards vs. punishments). The present study investigated whether the influence of personality on the decision-making process might be mediated by differential emotional responsiveness. Skin conductance levels were recorded in 32 subjects while performing the IGT. The results showed that novelty seeking (NS) modulated the skin conductance responses to feedback, and both NS and harm avoidance (HA) influenced anticipative response development. We also found that NS tended to modulate the final score, beyond the influence of beneficial anticipative autonomic responses. The present data partially support the hypothesis that personality-related differential emotional responsiveness may modulate somatic marker development in a decision-making situation. On the other hand, personality influence on the performance was not entirely explained by these emotional differences.
References
2001). Temperament and character inventory (TCI) personality profile and subtyping in alcoholic patients: A controlled study. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 36, 584–587.
(1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50, 7–15.
(2002). Decision-making and addiction (part I): Impaired activation of somatic states in substance dependent individuals when pondering decisions with negative future consequences. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1675–1689.
(1999). Different contributions of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision-making. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 5473–5481.
(2004). Stronger autonomic response accompanies better learning: A test of Damasio’s somatic marker hypothesis. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 901–911.
(1987). A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 573–588.
(1999). The Temperament and Character Inventory-Revised. Center for psychobiology of personality. St. Louis, MO: Washington University.
(1993). A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50, 975–990.
(2002). J. A. Gray’s reinforcement sensitivity theory: Tests of the joint subsystem hypothesis of anxiety and impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 511–532.
(1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. New York: Grosset/Putman.
(2000). Personality effects on attentional shift to emotional charged cues: ERP, behavioral and HR data. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 217–238.
(2008). You bet: How personality differences affect risk-taking preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1484–1494.
(2008). Subjective valuation and asymmetrical motivational systems: Implications of scope insensitivity for decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21, 211–224.
(2006). The somatic marker hypothesis: A critical evaluation. Neurosciences and Biobehavioral Review, 30, 239–271.
(2004). Paradoxical effects of education on the Iowa Gambling Task. Brain and Cognition, 54, 240–244.
(2005). Individual differences in decision-making. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 991–998.
(2008). Impulsivity is associated with behavioral decision-making deficits. Psychiatry Research, 158, 155–163.
(1970). The psychophysiological basis of introversion-extraversion. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 8, 249–266.
(2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An inquiry into the functions of the septohippocampal system (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(1998). Relations between affect and personality: Support for the affect-level and affective-reactivity views. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 279–288.
(2002). Somatic markers, working memory, and decision making. Cognitive and Affective Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 341–353.
(2008). Personality correlates of Iowa Gambling Task performance in healthy adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 598–609.
(2011). Effects of the BAS and BIS on decision-making in a gambling task. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1131–1135.
(2004). A reexamination of the evidence for the somatic marker hypothesis: What participants really know in the Iowa Gambling Task. Proceeds of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 101, 16075–16080.
(2009). Autonomic aspect of emotional response in depressed patients: Relationships with personality. Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology, 39, 209–216.
(2006). Personality traits modulate skin conductance response to emotional pictures: An investigation with Cloninger’s model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1603–1614.
(2008). Anxiety impairs decision-making: Psychophysiological evidence from an Iowa Gambling Task. Biological Psychology, 77, 353–358.
(2007). Neuroticism is associated with larger and more prolonged electrodermal responses to emotionally evocative pictures. Psychophysiology, 44, 823–826.
(2000). Temperament and character during the course of unipolar depression among inpatients. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 250, 40–47.
(2007). Affect and personality correlates of the Iowa Gambling Task. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 27–36.
(2003). Application of the somatic marker hypothesis to individual differences in decision making. Biological Psychology, 65, 81–88.
(2002). Defective somatic markers in subclinical psychopathy. Neuroreport, 13, 1025–1027.
(1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.
(2009). Relationships between affective states and decision-making. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 74, 259–265.
(