Skip to main content
Original Article

Personality and Skin Conductance Responses to Reward and Punishment

Influence on the Iowa Gambling Task Performance

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000057

For several years now, the somatic aspect of emotions has been regarded as a major factor in the decision-making process. A large body of literature has investigated this issue, within the somatic marker hypothesis perspective, using the classical Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). Many studies reported an influence of clinical and differential factors, including personality, on IGT performance. On the other hand, personality appears to modulate the emotional responses as a function of valence (i.e., responses to rewards vs. punishments). The present study investigated whether the influence of personality on the decision-making process might be mediated by differential emotional responsiveness. Skin conductance levels were recorded in 32 subjects while performing the IGT. The results showed that novelty seeking (NS) modulated the skin conductance responses to feedback, and both NS and harm avoidance (HA) influenced anticipative response development. We also found that NS tended to modulate the final score, beyond the influence of beneficial anticipative autonomic responses. The present data partially support the hypothesis that personality-related differential emotional responsiveness may modulate somatic marker development in a decision-making situation. On the other hand, personality influence on the performance was not entirely explained by these emotional differences.

References

  • Basiaux, P. , LeBon, O. , Dramaix, M. , Massat, I. , Souery, D. , Mendlewicz, J. , ... Verbanck, P. (2001). Temperament and character inventory (TCI) personality profile and subtyping in alcoholic patients: A controlled study. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 36, 584–587. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bechara, A. , Damasio, A. R. , Damasio, H. , Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50, 7–15. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bechara, A. , Damasio, H. (2002). Decision-making and addiction (part I): Impaired activation of somatic states in substance dependent individuals when pondering decisions with negative future consequences. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1675–1689. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bechara, A. , Damasio, H. , Damasio, A. R. , Lee, G. P. (1999). Different contributions of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision-making. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 5473–5481. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carter, S. , Smith-Pasqualini, M. C. (2004). Stronger autonomic response accompanies better learning: A test of Damasio’s somatic marker hypothesis. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 901–911. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cloninger, C. R. (1987). A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 573–588. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cloninger, C. R. (1999). The Temperament and Character Inventory-Revised. Center for psychobiology of personality. St. Louis, MO: Washington University. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cloninger, C. R. , Svrakic, D. M. , Przybeck, T. R. (1993). A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50, 975–990. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Corr, P. J. (2002). J. A. Gray’s reinforcement sensitivity theory: Tests of the joint subsystem hypothesis of anxiety and impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 511–532. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. New York: Grosset/Putman. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • De Pascalis, V. , Speranza, O. (2000). Personality effects on attentional shift to emotional charged cues: ERP, behavioral and HR data. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 217–238. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Demaree, H. A. , DeDonno, M. A. , Burns, K. J. , Everhart, D. E. (2008). You bet: How personality differences affect risk-taking preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1484–1494. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Desmeules, R. , Bechara, A. , Dubé, L. (2008). Subjective valuation and asymmetrical motivational systems: Implications of scope insensitivity for decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21, 211–224. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dunn, B. D. , Dalgleish, T. , Lawrence, A. D. (2006). The somatic marker hypothesis: A critical evaluation. Neurosciences and Biobehavioral Review, 30, 239–271. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Evans, C. E. Y. , Kemish, K. , Turnbull, O. H. (2004). Paradoxical effects of education on the Iowa Gambling Task. Brain and Cognition, 54, 240–244. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Franken, I. H. A. , Muris, P. (2005). Individual differences in decision-making. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 991–998. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Franken, I. H. , VanStrien, J. W. , Nijs, I. , Muris, P. (2008). Impulsivity is associated with behavioral decision-making deficits. Psychiatry Research, 158, 155–163. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gray, J. A. (1970). The psychophysiological basis of introversion-extraversion. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 8, 249–266. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gray, J. A. , McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An inquiry into the functions of the septohippocampal system (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gross, J. J. , Sutton, S. K. , Ketelaar, T. (1998). Relations between affect and personality: Support for the affect-level and affective-reactivity views. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 279–288. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hinson, J. M. , Jameson, T. L. , Whitney, P. (2002). Somatic markers, working memory, and decision making. Cognitive and Affective Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 341–353. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hooper, C. J. , Luciana, M. , Wahlstrom, D. , Conklin, H. M. , Yarger, R. S. (2008). Personality correlates of Iowa Gambling Task performance in healthy adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 598–609. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kim, D.-Y. , Lee, J. H. (2011). Effects of the BAS and BIS on decision-making in a gambling task. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1131–1135. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Maia, T. V. , McClelland, J. L. (2004). A reexamination of the evidence for the somatic marker hypothesis: What participants really know in the Iowa Gambling Task. Proceeds of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 101, 16075–16080. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mardaga, S. , Hansenne, M. (2009). Autonomic aspect of emotional response in depressed patients: Relationships with personality. Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology, 39, 209–216. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mardaga, S. , Laloyaux, O. , Hansenne, M. (2006). Personality traits modulate skin conductance response to emotional pictures: An investigation with Cloninger’s model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1603–1614. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miu, A. C. , Heilman, R. M. , Houser, D. (2008). Anxiety impairs decision-making: Psychophysiological evidence from an Iowa Gambling Task. Biological Psychology, 77, 353–358. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Norris, C. J. , Larsen, J. T. , Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). Neuroticism is associated with larger and more prolonged electrodermal responses to emotionally evocative pictures. Psychophysiology, 44, 823–826. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Richter, J. , Eisemann, M. , Richter, G. (2000). Temperament and character during the course of unipolar depression among inpatients. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 250, 40–47. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Suhr, J. A. , Tsanaris, J. (2007). Affect and personality correlates of the Iowa Gambling Task. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 27–36. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Suzuki, A. , Hirota, A. , Takasawa, N. , Shigemasu, K. (2003). Application of the somatic marker hypothesis to individual differences in decision making. Biological Psychology, 65, 81–88. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Van Honk, J. , Hermans, E. J. , Putman, P. , Montagne, B. , Schutter, D. J. (2002). Defective somatic markers in subclinical psychopathy. Neuroreport, 13, 1025–1027. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Watson, D. , Clark, L. , Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Werner, N. S. , Dushek, S. , Schandry, R. (2009). Relationships between affective states and decision-making. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 74, 259–265. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar