Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Social Desirability in Personality Inventories

The Nature of the Evaluative Factor

Published Online:January 01, 2014https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000138

Abstract

The difference between evaluatively loaded and evaluatively neutralized five-factor inventory items was used to create new variables, one for each factor in the five-factor model. Study 1 showed that these variables can be represented in terms of a general evaluative factor which is related to social desirability measures and indicated that the factor may equally well be represented as separate from the Big Five as superordinate to them. Study 2 revealed an evaluative factor in self-ratings and peer ratings of the Big Five, but the evaluative factor in self-reports did not correlate with such a factor in ratings by peers. In Study 3 the evaluative factor contributed above the Big Five in predicting work performance, indicating a substance component. The results are discussed in relation to measurement issues and self-serving biases.

References

  • Anusic, I. , Schimmack, U., Pinkus, R. T. , Lockwood, P. (2009). The nature and structure of correlations among Big Five ratings: The halo-alpha-beta model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1142–1156. doi: 10.1037/a0017159 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ashton, M. C., Lee, K. (2005). Honesty-humility, the Big Five, and the Five Factor Model. Journal of Personality, 73, 1321–1354. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00351.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bäckström, M. (2007). Higher-order factors in a five-factor personality inventory and its relation to social desirability. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 63–70. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.23.2.63 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Bäckström, M. (2009). Self-ratings on the IPIP versus Paulhus version of self-deception and impression management scales. Unpublished raw data First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bäckström, M. , Björklund, F. (2013). Social desirability in personality inventories: Symptoms, diagnosis and prescribed cure. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 54, 152–159. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12015 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bäckström, M. , Björklund, F. , Larsson, M. R. (2009). Five-factor inventories have a major higher order factor related to social desirability which can be reduced by framing items neutrally. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 335–344. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.013 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bäckström, M. , Björklund, F. , Larsson, M. R. (2012). Social desirability in personality assessment: Outline of a model to explain individual differences. In M. Ziegler C. MacCann R. D. RobertsEds., New perspectives on faking in personality assessment (pp. 201–213). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Block, J. (1965). The challenge of response sets: Unconfounding meaning, acquiescence, and social desirability in the MMPI. New York, NY: Appelton-Century-Crofts. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Borkenau, P. , Ostendorf, F. (1989). Descriptive consistency and social desirability in self- and peer reports. European Journal of Personality, 3, 31–45. doi: 10.1002/per.2410030105 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Campbell, D. T., Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105. doi: 10.1037/h0046016 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Conway, J. M. (1999). Distinguishing contextual performance from task performance for managerial jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 3–13. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246–1256. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1246 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Edwards, A. L. (1957). The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. New York, NY: Dryden Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W. , Hogan, R. , Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R. , Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • John, O. P., Robins, R. W. (1993). Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: The Big Five domains, observability, evaluativeness and the unique perspective of the self. Journal of Personality, 61, 521–551. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00781.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jöreskog, K. G. , Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL 8 (Version 8.8). Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Konstabel, K., Aavik, T. , Allik, J. (2006). Social desirability and consensual validity of personality traits. European Journal of Personality, 20, 549–566. doi: 10.1002/per.593 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kwan, V. S. Y., John, O. P., Robins, R. W. , Kuang, L. L. (2008). Conceptualizing and assessing self-enhancement bias: A componential approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 1062–1077. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.1062 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lönnqvist, J.-E. , Paunonen, S., Nissinen, V., Ortju, K. , Verkasalo, M. (2011). Self-enhancement in military leaders: Its relevance to officer selection and performance. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 60, 670–695. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00452.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Musek, J. (2007). A general factor of personality: Evidence for the big one in the five factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1213–1233. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2007.02.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598–609. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Paulhus, D. L., John, O. P. (1998). Egoistic and moralistic biases in self-perception: The interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives. Journal of Personality, 66, 1025–1060. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00041 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Paulhus, D. L., Vazire, S. (2007). The self-report method. In R. W. Robins R. C. Fraley R. F. KruegerEds., Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 224–237). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Peabody, D. (1967). Trait inferences: Evaluative and descriptive aspects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 1–18. doi: 10.1037/h0025230 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pettersson, E., Turkheimer, E., Horn, E. E. , Menatti, A. R. (2012). The general factor of personality and evaluation. European Journal of Personality, 26, 292–302. doi: 10.1002/per.839 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Revelle, W., Wilt, J. (2013). The general factor of personality: A general critique. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 493–504. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2013.04.012 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rushton, J. P., Bons, T. A., Hur, Y.-M. (2008). The genetics and evolution of the general factor of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1173–1185. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2008.03.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Saucier, G. (2002). Orthogonal markers for orthogonal factors: The case of the Big Five. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 1–31. doi: 0.1006/jrpe.2001.2335 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schriber, R. A., Robins, R. W. (2012). Self-knowledge: An individual differences perspective. In S. Vazire T. WilsonEds., Handbook of self-knowledge (pp. 105–127). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar