Abstract
The primary objective of this study was to determine if academics’ personality traits contribute to their organizational commitment. Three hundred and fifty-six academics from mainland China responded to the Organizational Commitment Inventory (OCI) and the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Having ascertained the reliability and the validity of the relatively new OCI, the study showed that, as expected, extraversion and conscientiousness were the most conducive to adaptive organizational commitment, whereas neuroticism contributed to nonadaptive organizational commitment. Results further suggested that agreeableness was detrimental to almost all types of organizational commitment and that openness, unexpectedly, positively contributed to one type of nonadaptive organizational commitment. Implications of these findings are discussed in relation to academics and university senior managers.
References
1960). Note on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 66, 32–42.
(2007). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and religious commitment of full-time university employees. Journal of Research on Christian Education, 16, 211–241.
(2005). Personality development: stability and change. The Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453–484.
(1992). The NEO-PI-R: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
(2004). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment among teachers in Norway: A comparative study of selected schools from public and private educational systems. Berrien Springs, MI: Andrews University.
(2010). Assessing cross-national invariance of the three-component model of organizational commitment: A six-country study of European university faculty. Cross-Cultural Research, 44, 341–373.
(2012). The structural relationships between organizational commitment, global job satisfaction, developmental experiences, work values, organizational support, and person-organization fit among nursing faculty. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68, 1601–1614.
(2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Educational.
(2010). The relationship of personality traits to satisfaction with the team: A study of interdisciplinary teacher teams in Rhode Island middle schools. Teacher Education. paper 3. Paper presented at the Northeastern Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Rocky Hill, CT, October 20–23, 2010.
(2010 ). The impact of work stress and organizational commitment on university faculty’s task performance and effectiveness in Mainland China. Unpublished doctoral thesis, The University of Hong Kong.2002). Research on Chinese employees’ orgnaizational commitment. Social Sciences in China (Autumn), 59–67.
(2006). A study on the occupational commitment factor structure of telecommunication staff. Psychological Science, 29, 994–997.
(2007). Brief versions of the NEO-PI-3. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 116–128. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001.28.3.116
(1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61–98.
(2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20–52.
(2003). Job stress and job performance among employees in Hong Kong: The role of Chinese work values and organizational commitment. International Journal of Psychology, 38, 337–347.
(2010). An empirical study of the performance of university teachers based on organizational commitment, job stress, mental health, and achievement motivation. Canadian Social Science, 6, 127–140.
(2012). Personality traits and occupational stress among Chinese academics. Educational Psychology, 32, 807–820.
(2014). Organizational commitment and teaching styles among academics in mainland China. Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2014.955462
(