Skip to main content
Original Article

The Extraverted Chameleon

Personality’s Effects on Mimicry of Verbal Behavior

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000159

Although mimicking behavior has been shown to relate to trait affiliation, there are no investigations of its relations to broader concepts of personality. In this study, personality was assessed in terms of the Big Five and mimicry was operationalized as adaptation in speech rates. In a within-subjects design, participants interacted with two confederates who differed in speech rate (slow, fast) and the participants’ speech rates in each condition were measured as words uttered per minute of speaking. Data were analyzed employing a multilevel modeling approach. Extraversion and openness significantly predicted participants’ adaptation in speech rate, whereas agreeableness did not. The role of affiliation and status, being building-blocks of extraversion and openness, as a sine qua non for the emergence of mimicry is discussed.

References

  • Avia, M. D., Sanchez-Bernardos, M. L., Sanz, J., Carrillo, J., & Rojo, N. (1998). Self-presentation strategies and the Five-Factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 108–114. doi: 10.1006/jrpe.1997.2205 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (2008). NEO-Fünf-Faktoren-Inventar [NEO Five-Factor Inventory]. (2nd ed.). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The Chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893–910. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chartrand, T. L., & Lakin, J. L. (2013). The antecedents and consequences of human behavioral mimicry. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 285–308. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143754 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cheng, C. M., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). Self-monitoring without awareness: Using mimicry as a nonconscious affiliation strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1170–1179. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.6.1170 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cook, R., Bird, G., Lünser, G., Huck, S., & Heyes, C. (2012). Automatic imitation in a strategic context: Players of rock-paper-scissors imitate opponents’ gestures. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279, 780–786. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1024 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (2010). The Five-Factor model, Five-Factor theory, and interpersonal psychology. In L. M. HorowitzS. StrackEds., Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment and therapeutic interventions (pp. 91–104). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dewaele, J.-M., & Furnham, A. (2000). Personality and speech production: A pilot study of second language learners. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 355–365. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00106-3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • DeYoung, C. G. (2006). Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1138–1151. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1138 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2002). Higher-order factors of the Big Five predict conformity: Are there neuroses of health? Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 533–552. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00171-4 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246–1256. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1246 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Furnham, A. (1989). Personality correlates of self-monitoring: The relationship between extraversion, neuroticism, type A behaviour and Snyder’s self-monitoring construct. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 35–42. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(89)90175-x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gallois, C., Giles, H., Jones, E., Cargile, A., & Ota, H. (1995). Accomodating intercultural encounters: Elaborations and extensions. In R. L. WisemanEd., Intercultural communication theory. International and intercultural communication annual, Vol. 19, (pp. 115–147). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ghaed, S. G., & Gallo, L. C. (2006). Distinctions among agency, communion, and unmitigated agency and communion according to the interpersonal circumplex, Five-Factor model, and social-emotional correlates. Journal of Personality Assessment, 86, 77–88. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8601_09 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Giles, H., Mulac, A., Bradac, J. J., & Johnson, P. (1987). Speech Accommodation Theory: The first decade and beyond. In M. L. McLaughlinEd., Communication yearbook, Vol. 10, (pp. 13–48). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26–34. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.48.1.26 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Guéguen, N., Jacob, C., & Martin, A. (2009). Mimicry in social interaction: Its effect on human judgment and behavior. European Journal of Social Sciences, 8, 253–259. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Helgeson, V. S., & Fritz, H. L. (2000). The implications of unmitigated agency and unmitigated communion for domains of problem behavior. Journal of Personality, 68, 1031–1057. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00125 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • John, O. P. (1990). The “Big Five” factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In L. A. PervinO. P. JohnEds., Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 66–100). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Karremans, J. C., & Verwijmeren, T. (2008). Mimicking attractive opposite-sex others: The role of romantic relationship status. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 939–950. doi: 10.1177/0146167208316693 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kiesler, D. J. (1996). Contemporary interpersonal theory and research – Personality, psychopathology and psychotherapy. New York, NY: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kilduff, M., & Day, D. V. (1994). Do chameleons get ahead? The effects of self-monitoring on managerial careers. The Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1047–1060. doi: 10.2307/256612 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kreft, I. G. G., & de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introduction to multilevel modeling. London, UK: Sage. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lakin, J. L., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport. Psychological Science, 14, 334–339. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.14481 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Leighton, J., Bird, G., Orsini, C., & Heyes, C. (2010). Social attitudes modulate automatic imitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 905–910. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.07.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Manson, J. H., Bryant, G. A., Gervais, M. M., & Kline, M. A. (2013). Convergence of speech rate in conversation predicts cooperation. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 419–426. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.08.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Martin, A., Guéguen, N., & Fischer-Lokou, J. (2010). The impact of guilt on mimicry behavior. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 38, 987–991. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2010.38.7.987 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1989). The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins’s circumplex and the Five-Factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 586–595. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.56.4.586 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the Five-Factor Model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mehra, A., Kilduff, M., & Brass, D. J. (2001). The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for workplace performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 121–146. doi: 10.2307/2667127 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Morrison, K. A. (1997). Personality correlates of the Five-Factor model for a sample of business owners/managers: Associations with scores on self-monitoring, type A behavior, locus of control, and subjective well-being. Psychological Reports, 80, 255–272. doi: 10.2466/pr0.80.1.255-272 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nezlek, J. B. (2001). Multilevel random coefficient analyses of event- and interval-contingent data in social and personality psychology research. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 771–785. doi: 10.1177/0146167201277001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oh, H., & Kilduff, M. (2008). The ripple effect of personality on social structure: self-monitoring origins of network brokerage. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1155–1164. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1155 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pincus, A. L., & Gurtman, M. B. (1995). The three faces of interpersonal dependency: Structural analyses of self-report dependency measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 744–758. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.744 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pincus, A. L., Gurtman, M. B., & Ruiz, M. A. (1998). Structural analysis of social behavior (SASB): Circumplex analyses and structural relations with the interpersonal circle and the Five-Factor model of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1629–1645. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1629 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526–537. doi: 10.1037/h0037039 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sonnby-Borgström, M. (2002). Automatic mimicry reactions as related to differences in emotional empathy. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 43, 433–443. doi: 10.1111/1467-9450.00312 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Street, R. L. (1984). Speech convergence and speech evaluation in fact-finding interviews. Human Communication Research, 11, 139–169. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1984.tb00043.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Baaren, R. B., Maddux, W. W., Chartrand, T. L., De Bouter, C., & Van Knippenberg, A. (2003). It takes two to mimic: Behavioral consequences of self-construals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1093–1102. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1093 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wiggins, J. S. (1991). Agency and communion as conceptual coordinates for the understanding and measurement of interpersonal behavior. In W. M. GroveD. CicchettiEds., Thinking clearly about psychology, Vol. 2, (pp. 89–113). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wiggins, J. S., & Pincus, A. L. (1994). Personality structure and the structure of personality disorders. In P. T. Costa Jr.T. A. WidigerEds., Personality disorders and the Five-Factor model of personality (pp. 73–93). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wolf, H., Spinath, F. M., Riemann, R., & Angleitner, A. (2009). Self-monitoring and personality: A behavioural-genetic study. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 25–29. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.01.040 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar