Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

On the Relative Importance of Personal Values

Validating Schwartz’s Theory of Value Structures by Computerized Paired Comparisons

Published Online:January 01, 2015https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000162

Abstract

The relative importance of values is a central feature in Schwartz’s value theory. However, instruments used for validating his theory did not assess relative importance directly. Rather, values were independently rated and scores then statistically centered, person-by-person. Whether these scores match those that result from explicitly comparing values has not been tested. We study this here using the Computerized Paired Comparison of Values (CPCV). This instrument was applied to samples from Germany, Brazil, Spain, and Israel, together with Schwartz’s Portrait Values Questionnaire (PVQ). CPCV- and PVQ-data were analyzed by separate and joint multidimensional scaling, generalized procrustes, and response time analyses. Results support the validity of Schwartz’s structural theory, independently of the assessment instrument used.

References

  • Allport, G. W., & Vernon, P. E. (1931). A study of values. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bergert, F. B., & Nosofsky, R. M. (2007). A response-time approach to comparing generalized rational and take-the-best models of decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 107–129. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.107 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bilsky, W., Janik, M., & Schwartz, S. H. (2011). The structural organization of human values: Evidence from three rounds of the European Social Survey (ESS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 759–776. doi: 10.1177/0022022110362757 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Borg, I., & Groenen, P. (1997). Multitrait-multimethod by multidimensional scaling. In W. BandillaF. FaulbaumEds., SoftStat ‘97, Advances in Statistical Software 6 (pp. 59–65). Stuttgart, Germany: Lucius & Lucius. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Borg, I., & Groenen, P. (2005). Modern multidimensional scaling. Berlin, Germany: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brocke, M., & Bilsky, W. (2005, July). The measurement of value preferences by paired comparisons. Paper presented at the First ESRA Conference, July 18–22, 2005, Barcelona, Spain. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Dancer, L. S. (1990). Introduction to facet theory and its applications. Applied Psychology, 39, 365–377. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1990.tb01061.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dawis, R. V. (1987). Scale construction. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 481–489. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.34.4.481 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kluckhohn, C. (1951). Values and value-orientations in the theory of action: An exploration in definition and classification. In T. ParsonsE. ShilsEds., Toward a general theory of action (pp. 388–433). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Knafo, A., Roccas, S., & Sagiv, L. (2011). The value of values in cross-cultural research: A special issue in honor of Shalom Schwartz. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 178–185. doi: 10.1177/0022022110396863 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Brown, A. (2010). Item response modelling of paired comparison and ranking data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 935–974. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2010.531231 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Oishi, S., Diener, E., Suh, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Value as a moderator in subjective well-being. Journal of Personality, 67, 157–184. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00051 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Oishi, S., Hahn, J., Schimmack, U., Radhakrishan, P., Dzokoto, V., & Ahadi, S. (2005). The measurement of values across cultures: A pairwise comparison approach. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 299–305. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2004.08.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Oishi, S., Schimmack, U., Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (1998). The measurement of values and individualism-collectivism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1177–1189. doi: 10.1177/01461672982411005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pakizeh, A., Gebauer, J. E., & Maio, G. R. (2007). Basic human values: Inter-value structure in memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 458–465. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.04.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York, NY: The Free Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. ZannaEd., Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). New York, NY: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schwartz, S. H. (2005). Human values. European Social Survey Education Net Retrieved from http://essedunet.nsd.uib.no/cms/topics/1/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550–562. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.550 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., & Owen, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 519–542. doi: 10.1177/0022022101032005001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schwartz, S. H., & Sagiv, L. (1995). Identifying culture-specifics in the content and structure of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 92–116. doi: 10.1177/0022022195261007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Thurstone, L. L. (1927). The method of paired comparisons for social values. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 21, 384–400. doi: 10.1037/h0065439 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Toyoda, H., Kawahashi, I., & Matsushita, N. (2005). Improvement of Emotional Intelligence Quotient (EQ) Test used for employment. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 53, 456–466. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Toyoda, H., Kawahashi, I., Watanabe, R., & Hidaka, M. (2007). A paired comparison test model using structural equation modelling resistant to response bias. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 325–334. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • VanLeeuwen, D. M., & Mandabach, K. H. (2002). A note on the reliability of ranked items. Sociological Methods & Research, 31, 87–105. doi: 10.1177/0049124102031001004 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar