Skip to main content
Original Article

Agreeableness, Conflict Resolution Tactics, and School Behavior in Second Graders

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000199

Abstract. This study examined the association between Agreeableness and children’s selection of conflict resolution tactics and their overt behaviors at school. A total of 157 second graders responded to a series of conflict resolution vignettes and were observed three times during physical education classes at school. We hypothesized that Agreeableness would be inversely related to the endorsement of power assertion tactics and to displays of problem behaviors, and positively related to the endorsement of negotiation tactics and to displays of adaptive behaviors. Consistent with hypotheses, Agreeableness was inversely related to power assertion tactics and to displays of off-task, disruptive, and verbally aggressive behaviors. There was no evidence that Agreeableness was related to more socially sophisticated responses to conflict, such as negotiation, with our sample of second grade students; however, it was related to displays of adaptive behaviors, specifically on-task behaviors. Limitations, including potential reactivity effects and the restriction of observational data collection to one school-based setting, are discussed. Future researchers are encouraged to collect data from multiple sources in more than one setting over time.

References

  • Abe, J. A. (2005). The predictive validity of the five-factor model of personality with preschool age children: A nine year follow-up study. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 423–442. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2004.05.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Abe, J. A. & Izard, C. E. (1999). A longitudinal study of emotion expression and personality relations in early development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 566–577. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.566 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ahadi, S. A. & Rothbart, M. K. (1994). Temperament, development, and the Big Five. In C. F. Halverson Jr.G. A. KohnstammR. P. MartinEds., The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood (pp. 189–207). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Aiken, L. & West, S. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bartko, J. & Carpenter, W. T. (1976). On the methods and theory of reliability. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 163, 307–317. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bowers, K. S. (1973). Situationism in psychology: An analysis and a critique. Psychological Review, 80, 307–336. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Digman, J. M. & Takemoto-Chock, N. K. (1981). Factors in the natural language of personality: Re-analysis, comparison, and interpretation of six major studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16, 149–170. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1602_2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Field, R. D., Tobin, R. M. & Reese-Weber, M. (2014). Agreeableness, social self-efficacy, and conflict resolution strategies. Journal of Individual Differences, 35, 95–102. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000131 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Gioia, K. A., Tobin, R. M. & Schneider, W. J. (2009, August). Individual differences in children’s responsiveness to a social skills intervention. Poster presented at the annual American Psychological Association convention, Toronto, ON. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Graziano, W. G. & Eisenberg, N. (1997). Agreeableness: A dimension of personality. In R. HoganJ. JohnsonS. BriggsEds., Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 795–824). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978-012134645-4/50031-7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Graziano, W. G., Habashi, M., Sheese, B. & Tobin, R. M. (2007). Agreeableness, empathy, and helping: A person X situation perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 582–599. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Graziano, W. G., Jensen-Campbell, L. A. & Hair, E. C. (1996). Perceiving interpersonal conflict and reacting to it: The case for Agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 820–835. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.820 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Graziano, W. G. & Tobin, R. M. (2009). Agreeableness. In M. R. LearyR. H. HoyleEds., Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 46–61). New York: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Graziano, W. G. & Tobin, R. M. (2013). Agreeableness as an integrated process of cognition and emotion. In M. D. RobinsonE. WatkinsE. Harmon-JonesEds., Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 347–364). New York, NY: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Harter, S. & Pike, R. (1984). The pictorial scale of perceived competence and social acceptance for young children. Child Development, 55, 1969–1982. doi: 10.2307/1129772 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jensen-Campbell, L. A., Gleason, K. A., Adams, R. & Malcolm, K. T. (2003). Interpersonal conflict, Agreeableness, and personality development. Journal of Personality, 71, 1059–1086. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.7106007 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jensen-Campbell, L. A. & Graziano, W. G. (2001). Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality, 69, 323–362. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.00148 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • John, O. P. & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. PervinO. P. JohnEds., Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Laursen, B. (1993). Conflict management among close peers. Close Friendships in Adolescence, 60, 39–54. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Laursen, B., Finkelstein, B. D. & Betts, N. T. (2001). A developmental meta-analysis of peer conflict resolution. Developmental Review, 21, 423–449. doi: 10.1006/drev.2000.0531 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sackin, S. & Thelen, E. (1984). An ethological study of peaceful associative outcomes to conflict in preschool children. Child Development, 55, 1098–1102. doi: 10.2307/1130162 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar