Skip to main content
Original Article

Self-Perceived Competence and Test Anxiety

The Role of Academic Self-Concept and Self-Efficacy

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000202

Abstract. Extrapolating from social-cognitive theory, this research examined whether academic self-efficacy mediates the association between academic self-concept and the four facets of test anxiety (worry, interference, lack of confidence, emotionality) in a large sample of adolescent students (N = 845; Mage = 15.32; SD = 0.49) from Brandenburg, Germany. Quantitative data structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed to analyze these associations. Results showed that there are negative relations between academic self-concept and three facets of test anxiety (namely interference, lack of confidence, emotionality), which are mitigated through academic self-efficacy. All three identified indirect effects revealed full mediation. Overall, the current study extends the literature on test anxiety in education settings by highlighting the importance of academic self-efficacy for prevention and intervention strategies that aim to reduce adolescents’ feelings of test anxiety, as academic self-efficacy fully mediates the association between academic self-concept and three facets of test anxiety, except for worry.

References

  • Arens, A. K., Yeung, A. S., Nagengast, B. & Hasselhorn, M. (2013). Relations between self-esteem and academic self-concept for German elementary and secondary school students. Educational Psychology, 33, 443–464. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2013.772772 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Asparouhov, T. (2005). Sampling weights in latent variable modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 411–434. doi: 10.1207/s15328007sem1203_4 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bandalos, D. L., Yates, K. & Thorndike-Christ, T. (1995). Effects of math self-concept, perceived self-efficacy, and attributions for failure and success on test anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 611–623. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.87.4.611 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Boekaerts, M. (1995). Self-regulated learning: Bridging the gap between metacognitive and metamotivation theories. Educational Psychologist, 30, 195–200. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3004_4 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bonaccio, S. & Reeve, C. L. (2010). The nature and relative importance of students’ perceptions of the sources of test anxiety. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 617–625. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.09.007 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bong, M. & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15, 1–40. doi: 10.1023/A:1021302408382 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bryan, A., Schmiege, S. J. & Broaddus, M. R. (2007). Mediational analysis in HIV/AIDS research: Estimating multivariate path analytic models in a structural equation modeling framework. AIDS and Behavior, 11, 365–383. doi: 10.1007/s10461-006-9150-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chan, D. (2009). So why ask me? Are self-report data really that bad?. In C. E. LanceR. J. VandenbergEds., Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends (pp. 309–336). New York, NY: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Christ, O. & Schlüter, E. (2012). Strukturgleichungsmodelle mit Mplus. Eine praktische Einführung [Structural equation modeling. A practical introduction]. München, Germany: Oldenbourg. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Corr, P. J. & Gray, J. A. (1995). Attributional style, socialization and cognitive ability as predictors of sales success: A predictive validity study. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 241–252. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(94)00153-J First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ergene, T. (2003). Effective interventions on test anxiety reduction: A meta-analysis. School Psychology International, 24, 313–328. doi: 10.1177/01430343030243004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ferla, J., Valcke, M. & Cai, Y. (2009). Academic self-efficacy and academic self-concept: Reconsidering structural relationships. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 499–505. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2009.05.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Harpell, J. V. & Andrews, J. J. W. (2012). Multi-informant test anxiety assessment of adolescents. Psychology, 3, 518–524. doi: 10.4236/psych.2012.37075 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hodapp, V., Rohrmann, S. & Ringeisen, T. (2011). Prüfungsangstfragebogen (PAF) [German test anxiety questionnaire]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L. T. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structural analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jansen, M., Scherer, R. & Schroeders, U. (2015). Students’ self-concept and self-efficacy in the sciences: Differential relations to antecedents and educational outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 13–24. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.11.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jerusalem, M. & Satow, L. (1999). Schulbezogene Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung [School-related self-efficacy expectations]. In R. SchwarzerM. JerusalemEds., Skalen zur Erfassung von Lehrer- und Schülermerkmalen (pp. 15–16). Berlin, Germany: Freie Universität Berlin. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lang, J. W. B. & Lang, J. (2010). Priming competence diminishes the link between cognitive test anxiety and test performance: Implications for the interpretation of test scores. Psychological Science, (21, 811–819). doi: 10.1177/0956797610369492 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G. & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question and weighting the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacKinnon, D. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York, NY: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Margolis, H. & McCabe, P. (2006). Improving self-efficacy and motivation: What to do, what to say. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41, 218–227. doi: 10.1177/10534512060410040401 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McDonald, A. T. (2001). The prevalence and effects of test anxiety in school children. Educational Psychology, 21, 89–101. doi: 10.1080/01443410020019867 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meece, J. L., Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J. S. (1990). Predictors of math anxiety and its consequences for young adolescents’ course enrolment intentions and performances in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 60–70. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.60 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mills, N., Pajares, F. & Herron, C. (2006). A reevaluation of the role of anxiety: Self-efficacy, anxiety, and their relation to reading and listening proficiency. Foreign Language Annals, 39, 276–295. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2006.tb02266.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Möller, J. & Marsh, H. W. (2013). Dimensional comparison theory. Psychological Review, 120, 544–560. doi: 10.1037/a0032459 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mowbray, T., Jacobs, K. & Boyle, C. (2014). Validity of the German Test Anxiety Inventory in an Australian sample. Australian Journal of Psychology, 67, 121–129. doi: 10.1111/ajpy.12058 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2013). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543–578. doi: 10.3102/00346543066004543 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pajares, F. & Graham, L. (1999). Self-efficacy, motivation constructs, and mathematics performance of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 124–139. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1998.0991 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pajares, F. & Kranzler, J. (1995). Self-efficacy beliefs and general mental ability in mathematical problem-solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 426–443. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1995.1029 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pajares, F. & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self-concept, and school achievement. In R. RidingS. RaynerEds., Self-perception (pp. 239–266). London, UK: Ablex Publishing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Perkins, A. M. & Corr, P. J. (2005). Can worriers be winners? The association between worrying and job performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 25–31. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2004.03.008 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Preacher, K. J. & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi: 10.3758/ BRM.40.3.879 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Putwain, D. W. & Daniels, R. A. (2010). Is the relationship between competence beliefs and test anxiety influenced by goal orientation? Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 8–13. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2009.10.006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ringeisen, T., Buchwald, P. & Hodapp, V. (2010). Capturing the multidimensionality of test anxiety in cross-cultural research: An English adaptation of the German Test Anxiety Inventory. Cognition, Brain, Behaviour, 14, 347–364. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Satorra, A. & Bentler, P. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514. doi: 10.1007/BF02296192 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schoene, C., Dickhaeuser, O., Spinath, B. & Stiensmeier-Pelster, J. (2002). Skalen zur Erfassung des schulischen Selbstkonzepts. Manual [Scales to assess academic self-concept. Manual]. Goettingen, Germany: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schunk, D. H. & Ertmer, P. A. (2000). Self-regulation and academic learning: Self-efficacy enhancing interventions. In M. BoekaertsP. R. PintrichM. ZeidnerEds., Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 631–649). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schunk, D. H. & Swartz, C. W. (1993). Goals and progress feedback: Effects on self-efficacy and writing achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 337–354. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1993.1024 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schnell, K., Ringeisen, T., Raufelder, D. & Rohrmann, S. (2015). The impact of adolescents’ self-efficacy and self-regulated goal attainment processes on school performance – Do gender and test anxiety matter? Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 90–98. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2014.12.008 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shrout, P. E. & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spielberger, C. D. & Vagg, P. R. (1995). Test anxiety: A transactional process model. In C. D. SpielbergerP. R. VaggEds., Test anxiety: Theory, assessment, and treatment (pp. 1–14). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Usher, E. L. & Pajares, F. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy in mathematics: A validation study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 89–101. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.09.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • von der Embse, N., Barterian, J. & Segool, N. (2013). Test Anxiety Interventions for children and adolescents: A systematic review of treatment studies from 2000–2010. Psychology in the Schools, 50, 57–71. doi: 10.1002/pits.21660 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • West, S. G., Finch, J. F. & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables. Problems and remedies. In R. H. HoyleEd., Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 56–75). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wine, J. (1982). Evaluation anxiety: A cognitive-attentional construct. In H. W. KrohneL. LauxEds., Achievement, stress, and anxiety (pp. 207–219). Washington, DC: Hemisphere. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Yuan, K.-H. & Bentler, P. M. (2004). On chi-square difference and z-tests in mean and covariance structure analysis when the base model is misspecified. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 737–757. doi: 10.1177/0013164404264853 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zeidner, M. (2007). Test anxiety in educational contexts: Concepts, findings, and future directions. In P. A. SchutzR. PekrunEds., Emotion in education (pp. 165–184). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zeidner, M. & Schleyer, E. J. (1999). The effects of educational context on individual differences variables, self-perceptions of giftedness, and school attitudes in gifted adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 28, 687–703. doi: 10.1023/A:1021687500828 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zimmerman, B. J. & Cleary, T. J. (2006). Too much confidence? The self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents with learning disabilities. In F. PajaresT. UrdanEds., Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 45–69). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar