Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Original Article

Is the General Factor of Personality Really Related to Frequency of Agreeable, Conscientious, Emotionally Stable, Extraverted, and Open Behavior?

An Experience Sampling Study

Published Online:February 25, 2021https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000341

Abstract

Abstract. Proponents of the general factor of personality have suggested that it is related to more instances of agreeable, conscientious, emotionally stable, extraverted, and open behavior. We tested this frequency hypothesis by relating the GFP from personality self-ratings to the number of instances of typical Big Five behaviors in real life. For a period of 18 consecutive days, 108 students provided responses to experience sampling items on their mobile phones. The items described concrete behaviors that were rated by experts of the Big Five as typical of either of the five traits and were phrased in a way that made them easy to interpret and respond to. The items were then validated in study 1 and it was found that the behavior correlated with Big Five ratings. In a second study, we tested the hypothesis that GFP is related to a higher frequency of GFP related behavior. The results provided little support for the frequency hypothesis and are more compatible with an interpretation of the GFP in terms of style rather than substance.

References

  • Anusic, I., Schimmack, U., Pinkus, R. T., & Lockwood, P. (2009). The nature and structure of correlations among Big Five ratings: The halo-alpha-beta model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1142–1156. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017159 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Goldberg, L. R., & de Vries, R. E. (2009). Higher order factors of personality: Do they exist? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309338467 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bäckström, M., & Björklund, F. (2014). Social desirability in personality inventories: The nature of the evaluative factor. Journal of Individual Differences, 35, 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000138 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Bäckström, M., & Björklund, F. (2020a). The properties and utility of less evaluative personality scales: Reduction of social desirability; increase of construct and discriminant validity. Frontiers in Psychology: Quantitative Psychology and Measurement, 11, Article 560271. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.560271 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bäckström, M., & Björklund, F. (2020b). Two Five-Factor Inventories (English and Swedish) with evaluatively neutralized items. Department of Psychology, Lund University. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bäckström, M., Björklund, F., & Larsson, M. R. (2009). Five-factor inventories have a major higher order factor related to social desirability which can be reduced by framing items neutrally. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.013 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bäckström, M., Björklund, F., & Larsson, M. R. (2014). Criterion validity is maintained when items are evaluatively neutralized: Evidence from a Full‐Scale Five‐Factor Model Inventory. European Journal of Personality, 28, 620–633. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1960 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Buss, D. M., & Craik, K. H. (1983). The act frequency approach to personality. Psychological Review, 90, 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.90.2.105 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Chapman, B. P., & Goldberg, L. R. (2017). Act-frequency signatures of the Big Five. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 201–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.049 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Comensoli, A., & MacCann, C. (2013). Misconstruing methods and meaning in the General Factor of Personality. International Journal of Psychology, 48, 625–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.688134 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Danay, E., & Ziegler, M. (2011). Is there really a single factor of personality? A multirater approach to the apex of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 560–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.07.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fleeson, W., & Gallagher, P. (2009). The implications of Big Five standing for the distribution of trait manifestation in behavior: Fifteen experience-sampling studies and a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1097–1114. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016786 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. G. (2006). The International Personality Item Pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hopwood, C. J., Wright, A. G. C., & Donnellan, M. B. (2011). Evaluating the evidence for the general factor of personality across multiple inventories. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 468–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.06.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Irwing, P. (2013). The general factor of personality: Substance or artefact? Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 234–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.03.002 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Musek, J. (2017). The general factor of personality, Elsevier Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pelt, D. H. M., van der Linden, D., Dunkel, C. S., & Born, M. P. (2020). The General Factor of Personality and daily social experiences: Evidence for the social effectiveness hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 155, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109738 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pettersson, E., Turkheimer, E., Horn, E. E., & Menatti, A. R. (2012). The general factor of personality and evaluation. European Journal of Personality, 26, 292–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.839 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Revelle, W., & Wilt, J. (2013). The general factor of personality: A general critique. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 493–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.04.012 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Riemann, R., & Kandler, C. (2010). Construct validation using multitrait-multimethod-twin data: The case of a general factor of personality. European Journal of Personality, 24, 258–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.760 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Rushton, P., & Irwing, P. (2011). The general factor of personality: Normal and abnormal. In T. Chamorro-PremuzicS. von StummA. FurnhamEds., The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of individual differences (pp. 132–161). Wiley-Blackwell. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Van der Linden, D., te Nijenhuis, J., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). The general factor of personality: A meta-analysis of Big Five intercorrelations and a criterion-related validity study. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.03.003 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar