Hostile Attribution Biases in Vulnerable Narcissists Depends on the Socio-Relational Context
Abstract
Abstract. Narcissism, especially the vulnerable kind, is associated with anger and hostility. In a sample of outpatients, group psychotherapy (N = 74) and community members (N = 153), we replicated and extended previous work linking vulnerable, but not grandiose, narcissism to hostile attributions across different socio-relational contexts. We also examined if the level of ambiguity of social situations, assessed from the other-referent position, influences the relationship between vulnerable narcissism and attributing hostile intentionality, and whether narcissistic individuals distinguish hostile interpretations, depending on the level of ambiguity of the scene. In ambiguous vignettes, assessed from the self-referent position, higher levels of vulnerable narcissism were associated with a greater tendency to infer more attributions of hostile intentions with people with whom there was no close relationship (except for authority in the patient group). In the case of visual scenes, the positive relationship between vulnerable narcissism and attributed hostile intentionality appeared in accidental scenes, but not in hostile and ambiguous ones. In addition, the higher the vulnerable narcissism the lower the ability to differentiate between contextual nuances (e.g., the level of ambiguity). We replicated previous research indicating a relationship between vulnerable narcissism and hostile attribution bias, but shed new light on the phenomenon of this bias in that it appears to depend on the socio-relational context and the level of ambiguity of the situation.
References
2000). Struktura narcyzmu w polskiej adaptacji kwestionariusza NPI Ruskina i Halla
([Structure of narcissism in the polish adaptation of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory] . Czasopismo Psychologiczne, 6(3–4), 171–188.2004). Aggression-related hostility bias and social problem-solving deficits in adult males with mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 109(3), 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(2004)109<255:AHBASP>2.0.CO;2
(2007). The Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire (AIHQ): A new measure for evaluating hostile social-cognitive biases in paranoia. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 12(2), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546800600787854
(1984). Cross-situational consistency in causal attributions: Does attributional style exist? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(5), 1043–1058. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.5.1043
(2011). Narcyz w sieci społecznej, czyli co analiza sieci mówi o funkcjonowaniu osób narcystycznych.
([A narcissist in the social network: What does network analysis tell us about functioning of narcissistic individuals?] Psychologia Społeczna: Social Psychology, 6(17), 129–145.2014). The effects of vulnerable and grandiose narcissism on liking-based and disliking-based centrality in social networks. Journal of Research in Personality, 50, 42–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.02.004
(2019). The relationship of narcissism with tendency to react with anger and hostility: The roles of neuroticism and emotion regulation ability. Current Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00504-6
(2003). Interpersonal analysis of grandiose and vulnerable narcissism. Journal of Personality Disorders, 17(3), 188–207. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.17.3.188.22146
(2011). Statistik und Forschungsmethoden
([Statistics and research methods] . Beltz.2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069
(2021). Assuming the worst: Hostile attribution bias in vulnerable narcissists. Self and Identity, 20(2), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2019.1609574
(1997). Assessing hypersensitive narcissism: A reexamination of Murray’s Narcissism Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(4), 588–599. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1997.2204
(2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
(2014). Narcissism and empathy in young offenders and non-offenders. European Journal of Personality, 28(2), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1939
(2006). Frequent aggression and attribution of hostile intent in people with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities: An empirical investigation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 111(2), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[90:FAAAOH]2.0.CO;2
(2020). Personality and the perception of situations: The Big Five and Dark Triad traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 163, Article 110081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110081
(2020). Clinical correlates of vulnerable and grandiose narcissism: A personality perspective. Journal of Personality Disorders, 34(1), 107–130. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2018_32_384
(1975). Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism. Jason Aronson.
(1972). Thoughts on narcissism and narcissistic rage. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 27(1), 360–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/00797308.1972.11822721
(2018). The narcissism spectrum model: A synthetic view of narcissistic personality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868316685018
(2015). Narcissistic rage revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(5), 784–801. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000013
(2010). Searching for a vulnerable dark triad: Comparing factor 2 psychopathy, vulnerable narcissism, and borderline personality disorder. Journal of Personality, 78(5), 1529–1564. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00660.x
(2013). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism and the DSM-5 pathological personality trait model. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(3), 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.685907
(2011). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: A nomological network analysis. Journal of Personality, 79(5), 1013–1042. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00711.x
(2018). Vulnerable narcissism is (mostly) a disorder of neuroticism. Journal of Personality, 86(2), 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12303
(2019). Moderation analysis in two-instance repeated measures designs: Probing methods and multiple moderator models. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1088-6
(2010). Pathological narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 421–446. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131215
(1979). A Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Psychological Reports, 45(2), 590. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1979.45.2.590
(1988). A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 890–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.890
(2016). Entitled vengeance: A meta-analysis relating narcissism to provoked aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 42(4), 362–379. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21632
(2016). Measuring the situational eight DIAMONDS characteristics of situations: An optimization of the RSQ-8 to the S8*. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 32(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000246
(1987).
(The shame-rage spiral: A case study of an interminable quarrel . In H. B. LewisEd., The role of shame in symptom formation (pp. 109–149). Erlbaum.2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize? Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 609–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009
(2004). Are normal narcissists psychologically healthy? Self-esteem matters. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(3), 400–416. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.400
(1996). Relation of shame and guilt to constructive versus destructive responses to anger across the lifespan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 797–809. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.797
(2010). Personality and psychopathology of university students. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 23(1), 48–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0b013e328333d625
(2019). Using dominance analysis to decompose narcissism and its relation to aggression and externalizing outcomes. Assessment, 26(2), 260–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116685811
(1988). Social attributional biases of peer-rejected and aggressive children. Child Development, 59(4), 969–975. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130263
(2007). Tracking the evil eye: Trait anger and selective attention within ambiguously hostile scenes. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(3), 650–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.07.003
(1991). Two faces of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(4), 590–597. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.4.590
(2018). Issues resolved and unresolved in pathological narcissism. Current Opinion in Psychology, 21, 74–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.10.001
(2018). What does the ambiguous intentions hostility questionnaire really measure? The importance of context in evaluating hostility bias. Journal of Personality Assessment, 102(2), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1525389
(2020). How sensitivity to provocation shapes encoding and interpretation of ambiguous scenes in an eye tracking study. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 32(2), 180–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2020.1717498
(2019). Cognitive-behavioral (CBT) and psychodynamic (PDT) group psychotherapy and their impact on depressive symptoms and hostile attributions. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 69(4), 383–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207284.2019.1653189
(2020). Who complies with the restrictions to reduce the spread of COVID-19? Personality and perceptions of the COVID-19 situation. Personality and Individual Differences, 166, Article 110199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110199
(