Non-Graphical Solutions for Cattell’s Scree Test
Abstract
Most of the strategies that have been proposed to determine the number of components that account for the most variation in a principal components analysis of a correlation matrix rely on the analysis of the eigenvalues and on numerical solutions. The Cattell’s scree test is a graphical strategy with a nonnumerical solution to determine the number of components to retain. Like Kaiser’s rule, this test is one of the most frequently used strategies for determining the number of components to retain. However, the graphical nature of the scree test does not definitively establish the number of components to retain. To circumvent this issue, some numerical solutions are proposed, one in the spirit of Cattell’s work and dealing with the scree part of the eigenvalues plot, and one focusing on the elbow part of this plot. A simulation study compares the efficiency of these solutions to those of other previously proposed methods. Extensions to factor analysis are possible and may be particularly useful with many low-dimensional components.
References
1965). An asymptotic expansion for the distribution of the latent roots of the estimated covariance matrix. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 36, 1153–1173.
(1950). Tests of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 77–85.
(2001). Problems with parallel analysis in data sets with oblique simple structure. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 6, 69–96.
(1992). Remarks on parallel analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 509–540.
(1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276.
(2009). Accuracy of the parallel analysis procedure with polychoric correlations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 748–759.
(2010). Evaluation of parallel analysis methods for determining the number of factors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 885–901.
(1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1981). Cng scree test: An objective procedure for determining the number of factors.. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Multivariate Experimental Psychology.
(1954). Some necessary conditions for common factor analysis. Psychometrika, 19, 149–162.
(2003 ). Factor analytic methods useful for rotational and dimensional indeterminacies. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.2006). Bootstrap scree tests: A Monte Carlo simulation and applications to published data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 59, 35–57.
(1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185.
(2004). Determining the number of factors in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In , The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 301–315). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(1960). The applications of electronic computer to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151.
(1956). Tests of significance for the latent roots of covariance and correlation matrix. Biometrika, 43, 128–136.
(1963). Factor analysis as a statistical method. London, UK: Butterworths.
(2007). Determining the number of factors to retain in EFA: An easy-to-use computer program for carrying out parallel analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(2). Retrieved from pareonline.net/pdf/v12n2.pdf
(2006). FACTOR: A computer program to fit the exploratory factor analysis model. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 38, 88–91.
(2005). Some observations on the scree test, and on coefficient alpha. Thai Journal of Educational Research and Measurement, 3, 1–17.
(2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 32, 396–402.
(2010). nFactors: Parallel analysis and non graphical solutions to the Cattell’s scree test. [R package Version 2.3.1.]. Retrieved from cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nFactors/index.html
(2009). Performance of parallel analysis in retrieving unidimensionality in the presence of binary data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 50–61.
(1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321–327.
(2000). Construct explication through factor or component analysis: A review and evaluation of alternative procedures for determining the number of factors or components. In , Problems and solutions in human assessment: Honoring Douglas N. Jackson at seventy (pp. 41–71). Kluwer: Boston.
(2005). Parallel analysis with unidimensional binary data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 697–716.
(1986). An introduction to numerical computation. New York, NJ: Macmillan.
(2007). Assessing unidimensionality: A comparison of Rasch modeling, parallel analysis, and TETRAD. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 12(14). Retrieved from pareonline.net/pdf/v12n14.pdf
(1993). Using multiple regression to determine the number of factors to retain in factor analysis. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoint, 20, 5–9.
(1996). An objective counterpart to the visual scree test for factor analysis: The standard error scree. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 443–451.
(1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432–442.
(