Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.52.1.1

References

  • Berner, M., Maier, M.(2004). The direction of affective priming as a function of trait anxiety in the naming of target words with regular and irregular pronunciation. Experimental Psychology, 51, 180– 190 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Bornkessel, I. D., Fiebach, C. J., Friederici, A. D., Schlesewsky, M.(2004). “Capacity” reconsidered: Interindividual differences in language comprehension and individual alpha frequency. Experimental Psychology, 51, 279– 289 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Brandstädter, J., Voss, A., Rothermund, K.(2004). Perception of danger signals: The role of control. Experimental Psychology, 51, 24– 32 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Campos, A., Amor, A., González, M. A.(2004). The importance of the keyword- generation method in keyword mnmonics. Experimental Psychology, 51, 125– 131 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Demestre, J., García-Albea, J. E.(2004). The on-line resolution of the sentence complement/relative clause ambiguity: Evidence from Spanish. Experimental Psychology, 51, 59– 71 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Dinkel, A., Berth, H., Borkenhagen, A., Brähler, E.(2004). On raising the international dissemination of German research: Does changing publication language to English attract foreign authors to publish in a German basic psychology research journal?. Experimental Psychology, 51, 319– 330 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Duyck, W., Diependaele, K., Drieghe, D., Brysbaert, M.(2004). The size of the cross-lingual masked phonological priming effect does not depend on second language proficiency. Experimental Psychology, 51, 116– 124 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Fischer, M. H., Warlop, N., Hill, R. L., Fias, W.(2004). Oculomotor bias induced by number perception. Experimental Psychology, 51, 91– 97 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Guy, S., Buckolz, E., Pratt, J.(2004). The influence of distractor-only prime trials on the location negative priming mechanism. Experimental Psychology, 51, 4– 14 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Jacobsen, T., Schröger, E.(2004). Input to verbal working memory: Preattentive construction of the central speech representation. Experimental Psychology, 51, 231– 239 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Jiang, Y.(2004). Time window from visual images to visual short-term memory: Consolidation or integration?. Experimental Psychology, 51, 45– 51 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Kleinsorge, T.(2004). Hierarchical switching with two types of judgement and two stimulus dimensions. Experimental Psychology, 51, 145– 149 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Koch, I., Gade, M., Philipp, A. M.(2004). Inhibition of response mode in task switching. Experimental Psychology, 51, 52– 58 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Mecklinger, A., Pollmann, S., Schröger, E.(2004). Special issue: Working memory and cognition. Experimental Psychology, 51, 229– 230 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Müller, B.(2004). A multinomial model to access central characteristics of mental operators. Experimental Psychology, 51, 201– 213 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Müller, B., Gehrke, J.(2004). Acquisition and use of mental operators: The influence of natural order of events. Experimental Psychology, 51, 33– 44 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Narciss, S.(2004). The impact of informative tutoring feedback and self-efficacy on motivation and achievement in concept learning. Experimental Psychology, 51, 214– 228 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Newell, B. R., Andrews, S.(2004). Levels of processing effects on implicit and explicit memory tasks: Using question position to investigate the lexical-processing hypothesis. Experimental Psychology, 51, 132– 144 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Nuerk, H.-C., Weger, U., Willmes, K.(2004). On the perceptual generality of the unit-decade compatibility effect. Experimental Psychology, 51, 72– 79 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Ramponi, C., Richardson-Klavehn, A., Gardiner, J.(2004). Level of processing and age affect involuntary conceptual priming of weak but not strong associates. Experimental Psychology, 51, 159– 164 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Reynvoet, B., Brysbaert, M.(2004). Cross-notation number priming investigated at different stimulus onset asynchronies in parity and naming tasks. Experimental Psychology, 51, 81– 90 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Roßnagel, C. S.(2004). Lost in thought: Cognitive load and the processing of addressees’ feedback in verbal communication. Experimental Psychology, 51, 191– 200 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Rummer, R.(2004). Immediate and delayed recall of visually presented sentences: Evidence for the involvement of phonological information. Experimental Psychology, 51, 15– 23 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Spruyt, A., Hermans, D., Pandelaere, M., De Houwer, J., Eelen, P.(2004). On the replicability of the affective priming effect in the pronunciation task. Experimental Psychology, 51, 109– 115 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Steffens, M. C.(2004). Is the implicit association test immune to faking?. Experimental Psychology, 51, 165– 179 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Wagner, S., Gunter, T. C.(2004). Determining inhibition: Individual differences in the “lexicon context” trade-off during lexical ambiguity resolution in working memory. Experimental Psychology, 51, 290– 299 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Wühr, P.(2004). Sequential modulations of logical-recoding operations in the Simon Task. Experimental Psychology, 51, 98– 108 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Zakay, D., Ellis, S., Shevalsky, M.(2004). Outcome value and early warning indications as determinants of willingness to learn from experience. Experimental Psychology, 51, 150– 157 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar