Measuring Task-Switching Ability in the Implicit Association Test
Abstract
Abstract. Recently, the role of method-specific variance in the Implicit Association Test (IAT) was examined (McFarland & Crouch, 2002; Mierke & Klauer, 2003). This article presents a new content-unspecific control task for the assessment of task-switching ability within the IAT methodology. Study 1 showed that this task exhibited good internal consistency and stability. Studies 2-4 examined method-specific variance in the IAT and showed that the control task is significantly associated with conventionally scored IAT effects of the IAT-Anxiety. Using the D measures proposed by Greenwald, Nosek, and Banaji (2003), the amount of method-specific variance in the IAT-Anxiety could be reduced. Possible directions for future research are outlined.
References
(2002). Double dissociation between implicit and explicit personality self-concept: The case of shy behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 380– 393
(2001). Implicit attitudes towards homosexuality: Reliability, validity, and controllability of the IAT. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 145– 160
(2000). Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: The blind men and the elephant revisited?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 631– 643
(2001). How do indirect measures of evaluation work? Evaluating the inference of prejudice in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 81, 760– 773
The Implicit Association Test’s D measure can minimize a cognitive skill confound. Comment on McFarland and Crouch (2002) Social Cognition,
in press(2000). Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the implicit association of concepts and attributes. NeuroReport, 11, 135– 140
(2001). A structural and a process analysis of the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 443– 451
(2001). Inquisit. (Version 1.31) [Computer software]. Seattle, WA: Millisecond Software.
(2002). Predictive validity of an Implicit Association Test for assessing anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1441– 1455
(2003). Does social desirability moderate the relationship between implicit and explicit anxiety measures?. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1697– 1706
Temporal stability of the Implicit Association Test-Anxiety. Journal of Personality Assessment,
in press(2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297– 327
(2002). What does the Implicit Association Test measure? A test of the convergent and discriminant validity of prejudice-related IATs. Experimental Psychology, 49, 171– 180
(2000). Using the Implicit Association Test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 1022– 1038
(1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464– 1480
(2001). Health of the Implicit Association Test at age 3. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 85– 93
(2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197– 216
(1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis.. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
(2002). Using the Implicit Association Test to measure age differences in implicit social cognitions. Psychology and Aging, 17, 482– 495
(2001). Attitudes and the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 774– 788
Task-set inertia, attitude accessibility, and compatibility-order effects: New evidence for a task-set switching account of the IAT effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
(in press)(2001). Relations among the Implicit Association Test, discriminatory behavior, and explicit measures of racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 435– 442
(2002). A cognitive skills confound on the Implicit Association Test. Social Cognition, 20, 481– 506
(1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423– 1442
(2001). Implicit association measurement with then IAT: Evidence for effects of executive control processes. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 107– 122
(2003). Method-specific variance in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1180– 1192
(2000). Reconfiguration of task-set: Is it easier to switch to the weaker task?. Psychological Research, 63, 250– 264
(1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207– 231
(2001). Figure-ground-asymmetries in the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 94– 106
(2004). Underlying processes in the Implicit Association Test: Dissociating salience from associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 139– 165
(2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 763– 797
A latent state-trait analysis of explicit and implicit personality measures. European Journal of Psychological Assessment,
in press(2003). Implicit Association Test: Separating transsituationally stable and variable components of attitudes toward gay men. Experimental Psychology, 50, 33– 48
(1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245– 251
(2000). Task switching and the measurement of “switch costs”. Psychological Research, 63, 212– 233