Directional Verbal Probabilities
Inconsistencies Between Preferential Judgments and Numerical Meanings
Abstract
Verbal probability expressions (e.g., it is possible or doubtful) convey not only vague numerical meanings (i.e., probability) but also semantic functions, called directionality. We performed two experiments to examine whether preferential judgments are consistent with numerical meanings of verbal probabilities regardless of directionality. The results showed that because of the effects of directionality, perceived degrees of certainty for verbal probabilities differed between a binary choice and a numerical translation (Experiment 1), and decisions based on a verbal probability do not correspond to those based on a numerical translation for verbal probabilities (Experiment 2). These findings suggest that directionality of verbal probabilities is an independent feature from numerical meanings; hence numerical meanings of verbal probability alone remain insufficient to explain the effects of directionality on preferential judgments.
References
(1982). How probable is probable? Numerical translation of verbal probability expressions. Journal of Forecasting, 1, 257– 269
(2003). Predicting the directionality of probability words from their membership functions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16, 159– 180
(2002). Modeling certainty equivalents for imprecise gambles. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 88, 748– 768
(1995). Processing linguistic probabilities: General principles and empirical evidence. The Psychology of Learning & Motivation, 32, 275– 318
(1988). Decisions based on numerically and verbally expressed uncertainties. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 281– 294
(1990). Verbal versus numerical probabilities: Efficiency, biases, and the preference paradox. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 45, 1– 18
(1992). Effects of probability mode on preference reversal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 18, 855– 864
(2006). The vagueness and the directionality of verbal probability expressions: The properties of probability information and their effects on decision making. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 76, 519– 526 (in Japanese with English abstract).
(2004). You say “Probable” and I say “Likely”: Improving interpersonal communication with verbal probability phrases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10, 25– 41
(1993). Communicating quantities: A psychological perspective. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(2000). Communicating quantities: A review of psycholinguistic evidence of how expressions determine perspectives. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 237– 255
(2001). Denials as controllers of negative quantifier focus. Journal of Memory & Language, 44, 427– 442
(2003). New perspectives on the expression of quantity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 240– 243
(1995). Yes, but it is uncertain: Direction and communicative intention of verbal probabilistic terms. Acta Psychologica, 88, 233– 258
(1999). The directionality of verbal probability expressions: Effects on decisions, predictions, and probabilistic reasoning. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 80, 155– 190
(2003). Verbal expressions of uncertainty and probability. In L. Macci, D. Hardman (Eds.), Thinking: Psychological perspectives on reasoning and decision making (pp. 125-145). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
(1986). Measuring the vague meanings of probability terms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 348– 365
