Experimental Psychology

References

• American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Akiva-Kabiri, L. & Henik, A. (2014). Additional Insights. Experimental Psychology, 61, 75–77. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000208 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

• Erdfelder, E. (2010). Experimental Psychology: A note on statistical analysis. Experimental Psychology, 57, 1–4. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000001 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

• Gast, A. (2014). What is learned, and when? Experimental Psychology, 61, 71–74. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000206 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

• Gelman, A. & Loken, E. (2014). The statistical crisis in science. American Scientist, 102, 460–465. doi: 10.1511/2014.111.460 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Grégoire, L., Perruchet, P. & Poulin-Charronnat, B. (2014). Is the musical stroop effect able to keep its promises? Experimental Psychology, 61, 80–83. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000222 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

• Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 196–217. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

• Klauer, K. C. (2002). Tradition and change. Experimental Psychology, 49, 1. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.49.1.1 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

• Klauer, K. C., Becker, M. & Spruyt, A. (2016). Evaluative priming in the pronounciation task: A preregistered replication and extension. Experimental Psychology, 63, 70–78. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000286 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

• Kliegl, R. (2016). A vision of scientific communication. In P. WeingartN. TaubertEds., Wissenschaftliches Publizieren – Zwischen Digitalisierung, Leistungsmessung, Ökonomisierung und medialer Beobachtung (pp. 263–270). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Kriegeskorte, N., Walther, A. & Deca, D. (2012). An emerging consensus for open evaluation: 18 Visions for the future of scientific publishing. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 6, 1–5. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2012.00094 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

• Meiser, T. (2011). Experimental Psychology: A place for innovative research and methodological developments. Experimental Psychology, 58, 1–3. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000105 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

• Moeller, B. & Frings, C. (2014). How automatic is the musical stroop effect? Experimental Psychology, 61, 68–70. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000204 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

• Morey, R. D., Chambers, C. D., Etchells, P. J., Harris, C. R., Hoekstra, R., Lakens, D., … Zwaan, R. A. (2016). The peer reviewers’ openness initiative: Incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science, 3, 150547. doi: 10.1098/rsos.150547 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

• Schönbrodt, F., Gollwitzer, M. & Abele-Brehm, A. (2017). Der Umgang mit Forschungsdaten im Fach Psychologie: Konkretisierung der DFG-Leitlinien.[Data management in psychological science: Specification of the DFG guidelines] Psychologische Rundschau, 68, 20–35. doi: 10.1026/0033-3042/a000341 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

• Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D. & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366. doi: 10.1177/0956797611417632 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

• Zakay, D. (2014). Can the “Musical Stroop” task replace the classical stroop task? Experimental Psychology, 61, 78–79. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000211 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar