Numerical Congruency Effect in the Sentence-Picture Verification Task
Abstract
Abstract. In two experiments, we showed that irrelevant numerical information influenced the speed of sentence-picture verification. Participants were asked to verify whether the concept mentioned in a sentence matched the object presented in a subsequent picture. Concurrently, the number word attached to the concept in the sentence and the quantity of objects presented in the picture were manipulated (numerical congruency). The number of objects varied from one to four. In Experiment 1, participants read statements such as three dogs. In Experiment 2, they read sentences such as three dogs were wandering in the street. In both experiments, the verification speed revealed the interaction between response and numerical congruency. The verification times for concept-object match were faster when there was also numerical congruence (compared with incongruence) between the number word and quantity. On the other hand, there was no difference between numerical congruence and incongruence when the concept and object mismatched. The results are interpreted as evidence for the symbol grounding of number words in perceptual representation of small quantities, that is, quantities falling in the subitization range.
References
(2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
(2005). Computation of semantic number from morphological information. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 342–358. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.05.002
(2012). The origins and structure of quantitative concepts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 29, 149–173. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2012.707122
(2004). Bootstrapping and the origins of concepts. Daedalus, 133, 59–68. doi: 10.1162/001152604772746701
(1993). Normal and amnesic learning, recognition, and memory by a neural model of cortico-hippocampal interactions. Trends in Neurosciences, 16, 131–137. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(93)90118-6
(2003).
Adaptive resonance theory . In M. A. ArbibEd., The handbook of brain theory and neural networks (2nd ed., pp. 87–90). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.(2008). Are numbers special? An overview of chronometric, neuroimaging, developmental and comparative studies of magnitude representation. Progress in Neurobiology, 84, 132–147. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2007.11.001
(2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1, 42–45. doi: 10.20982/tqmp.01.1.p042
(2009). Origins of mathematical intuitions: The case of arithmetic. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1156, 232–259. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04469.x
(1993). The mental representation of parity and numerical magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371–396. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.122.3.371
(1995). Toward an anatomical and functional model of number processing. Mathematical Cognition, 1, 83–120.
(2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 487–506. doi: 10.1080/02643290244000239
(2016). Resonant dynamics of grounded cognition: Explanation of behavioral and neuroimaging data using the ART neural network. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 139. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00139
(2004). Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 307–314. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.002
(2005).
Spatial representation of numbers . In J. I. D. CampbellEd., Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 43–54). New York, NY: Psychology Press.(2011). When digits help digits: Spatial-numerical associations point to finger counting as prime example of embodied cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 260. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00260
(2014). Spatial associations in numerical cognition: From single digits to arithmetic. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1461–1483. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.927515
(2013). Size before numbers: Conceptual size primes numerical value. Cognition, 129, 18–23. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.06.001
(2013). How are automatic processes elicited by intended actions? Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 851. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00851
(2013). Adaptive resonance theory: How a brain learns to consciously attend, learn, and recognize a changing world. Neural Networks, 37, 1–47. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2012.09.017
(1982). Is three greater than five: The relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks. Memory & Cognition, 10, 389–395. doi: 10.3758/bf03202431
(2005). Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 435–448. doi: 10.1038/nrn1684
(2011). Two systems of non-symbolic numerical cognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 150. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00150
(2008). Calibrating the mental number line. Cognition, 106, 1221–1247. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.004
(1999). Primed numbers: Exploring the modularity of numerical representations with masked and unmasked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1882–1905. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.6.1882
(2007). One, two, three, four, nothing more: An investigation of the conceptual sources of the verbal counting principles. Cognition, 105, 395–438. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.005
(2016). The symbol-grounding problem in numerical cognition: A review of theory, evidence and outstanding questions. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 12–23. doi: 10.1037/cep0000070
(2013). The importance of being relevant: Modulation of magnitude representation. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 369. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00369
(2015). Embodied numerical cognition. London, UK: Taylor & Francis. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2015.1032295
(2012). Symbolic estrangement: Evidence against a strong association between numerical symbols and the quantities they represent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 635–641. doi: 10.1037/a0027248
(2007). The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 25–45. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190143
(2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4, 61–64. doi: 10.20982/tqmp.04.2.p061
(1967). Time required for judgments of numerical inequality. Nature, 215, 1519–1520. doi: 10.1038/2151519a0
(1973). Determinants of reaction time for digit inequality judgments. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1, 167–168. doi: 10.3758/bf03334328
(2009). Representation of number in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 32, 185–208. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135550
(2004). Notational modulation of the SNARC and the MARC (linguistc markedness of response codes) effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A, 57, 835–863.
(1999). Stroop and Garner effects in comparative judgments of numerals: The role of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 39–58. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.25.1.39
(2002). Comparative judgment of numerosity and numerical magnitude: Attention preempts automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 259–274. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.28.2.259
(2007). Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 8, 976–987. doi: 10.1038/nrn2277
(1998). Symbolic distance between numerosity and identity modulates Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1535–1545. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.5.1535
(1999). Further evidence on the effects of symbolic distance on Stroop-like interference. Psychological Research, 62, 62–71. doi: 10.1007/s004260050040
(1995). On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: A suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 785–794. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.21.3.785
(2006). Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 416–442. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.416
(2008). Does subitizing reflect numerical estimation? Psychological Science, 19, 607–614. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02130.x
(2009). Processing of color words activates color representations. Cognition, 111, 383–389. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.011
(2008).
Computational models of semantic memory . In R. SunEd., The Cambridge handbook of computational psychology (pp. 226–266). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511816772.012(2004). Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart’s object databank: The role of surface detail in basic level object recognition. Perception, 33, 217–236. doi: 10.1068/p5117
(2011). The size congruity effect: Is bigger always more? Cognition, 118, 97–113. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.014
(2002). E-Prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
(1971). Symbol processing speed differences and symbol interference effects in a variety of concepts domain. Journal of General Psychology, 85, 187–205. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1971.9920672
(1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 6, 174–215. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.6.2.174
(2007). Automatic guidance of visual attention from verbal working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 730–737. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.730
(2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 153–156. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00326
(1994). Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review, 101, 80–102. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.101.1.80
(2005).
Automaticity in processing ordinal information . In J. I. D. CampbellEd., Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 55–66). New York, NY: Psychology Press. doi: 10.1037/e527352012-726(2016). Prior knowledge about objects determines neural color representation in human visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 26, 1401–1408. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu224
(1968). Reaction time for numerical coding and naming numerals. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 318–322. doi: 10.1037/h0026289
(2004).
The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension . In B. H. RossEd., The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 35–62). New York, NY: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/s0079-7421(03)44002-4(2002). Do language comprehenders routinely represent the shapes of objects? Psychological Science, 13, 168–171. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00430
