Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Short Research Article

Moral Judgment in Old Age

Evidence for an Intent-to-Outcome Shift

Published Online:April 10, 2018https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000395

Abstract

Abstract. Younger (21–39 years) and older (63–90 years) adults were presented with scenarios illustrating either harmful or helpful actions. Each scenario provided information about the agent’s intention, either neutral or valenced (harmful/helpful), and the outcome of his or her action, either neutral or valenced. Participants were asked to rate how morally good or bad the agent’s action was. In judging harmful actions, older participants relied less on intentions and more on outcomes compared to younger participants. This age-related difference was associated with a decline in older adults’ theory of mind abilities. However, we did not find evidence of any significant age-related difference in the evaluations of helpful actions. We argue that the selective association of aging with changes in the evaluation of harmful but not helpful actions may be due also to motivational factors and highlight some implications of the present findings for judicial systems.

References

  • Anwar, S., Bayer, P. & Hjalmarsson, R. (2014). The role of age in jury selection and trial outcome. Journal of Law and Economics, 57, 1001–1030. https://doi.org/10.1086/675257 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Armon, C. & Dawson, T. L. (1997). Developmental trajectories in moral reasoning across the life span. Journal of Moral Education, 26, 433–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724970260404 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Arutyunova, K. R., Alexandrov, Y. I. & Hauser, M. D. (2016). Sociocultural influences on moral judgments: East-West, male-female, and young-old. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1334. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01334 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Jolliffe, T., Mortimore, C. & Robertson, M. (1997). Another advanced test of theory of mind: Evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 813–822. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01599.x First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Bruine de Bruin, W., McNair, S. J., Taylor, A. L., Summers, B. & Strough, J. (2015). “Thinking about numbers is not my idea of fun”: need for cognition mediates age differences in numeracy performance. Medical Decision Making, 35, 22–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x14542485 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Buon, M., Jacob, P., Loissel, E. & Dupoux, E. (2013). A non-mentalistic cause-based heuristic in human social evaluations. Cognition, 126, 149–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.006 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Buon, M., Seara-Cardoso, A. & Viding, E. (2016). Why (and how) should we study the interplay between emotional arousal, Theory of Mind, and inhibitory control to understand moral cognition? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1660–1680. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1042-5 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Carstensen, L. L. (1992). Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: Support for socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and Aging, 7, 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.7.3.331 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Carstensen, L. L. (2006). The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science, 312, 1913–1915. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127488 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Chap, J. B. (1986). Moral judgment in middle and late adulthood: The effects of age-appropriate moral dilemmas and spontaneous role taking. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 22, 161–171. https://doi.org/10.2190/a34t-a3q3-umef-39eb First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Charles, S. T., Mather, M. & Carstensen, L. L. (2003). Aging and emotional memory: The forgettable nature of negative images for older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 310–324. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.310 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Chen, Y. & Blanchard-Fields, F. (2000). Unwanted thought: Age differences in the correction of social judgments. Psychology of Aging, 15, 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.15.3.475 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Cushman, F., Sheketoff, R., Wharton, S. & Carey, S. (2013). The development of intent-based moral judgment. Cognition, 127, 6–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.008 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Folstein, M., Folstein, S. E. & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/t07757-000 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Gan, T., Lu, X., Li, W., Gui, D., Tang, H., Mai, X., … Luo, Y.-J. (2016). Temporal dynamics of the integration of intention and outcome in harmful and helpful moral judgment. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02022 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Geipel, J., Hadjichristidis, C. & Surian, L. (2016). Foreign language affects the contribution of intentions and outcomes to moral judgment. Cognition, 154, 34–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.05.010 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Gleichgerrcht, E. & Young, L. (2013). Low levels of empathic concern predict utilitarian moral judgment. PLoS One, 8, e60418. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060418 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Hamlin, J. K. (2013). Failed attempts to help and harm: Intention versus outcome in preverbal infants’ social evaluations. Cognition, 128, 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.04.004 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Hannikainen, I. R., Machery, E. & Cushman, F. A. (2018). Is utilitarian sacrifice becoming more morally permissible? Cognition, 170, 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.09.013 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Heaton, R. K. (1995). Wisconsin card sorting manual. Odessa, FL: Psychology Assessment Resources. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Henry, J. D., Phillips, L. H., Ruffman, T. & Bailey, P. E. (2013). A meta-analytic review of age differences in theory of mind. Psychology and Aging, 28, 826–839. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030677 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Killen, M., Mulvey, K. L., Richardson, C., Jampol, N. & Woodward, A. (2011). The accidental transgressor: Morally-relevant theory of mind. Cognition, 119, 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.01.006 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. GoshEd., Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ligneau-Herve, C. & Mullet, E. (2005). Perspective-taking judgments among young adults, middle-aged, and elderly people. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898x.11.1.53 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Margoni, F. & Surian, L. (2016a). Explaining the U-shaped development of intent-based moral judgments. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 219. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00219 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Margoni, F. & Surian, L. (2016b). Mental state understanding and moral judgment in children with autistic spectrum disorder. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1478. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01478 First citation in articleMedline, Google Scholar

  • Margoni, F. & Surian, L. (2017). Children’s intention-based moral judgments of helping agents. Cognitive Development, 41, 46–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2016.12.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Moran, J. M., Jolly, E. & Mitchell, J. P. (2012). Social-cognitive deficits in normal aging. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 5553–5561. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.5511-11.2012 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Narvaez, D., Radvansky, G. A., Lynchard, N. A. & Copeland, D. E. (2011). Are older adults more attuned to morally charged information? Experimental Aging Research, 37, 398–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073x.2011.590756 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Nobes, G., Panagiotaki, G. & Bartholomew, K. J. (2016). The influence of intention, outcome and question-wording on children’s and adults’ moral judgments. Cognition, 157, 190–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.019 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Oakley, B. F., Brewer, R., Bird, G. & Catmur, C. (2016). Theory of mind is not theory of emotion: A cautionary note on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125, 818–823. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000182 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Osman, M. & Wiegmann, A. (2017). Explaining moral behavior: A minimal moral model. Experimental Psychology, 64, 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000336 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Patil, I., Calò, M., Fornasier, F., Cushman, F. & Silani, G. (2017). The behavioral and neural basis of empathic blame. Scientific Reports, 7, 5200. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05299-9 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Patil, I. & Silani, G. (2014). Alexithymia increases moral acceptability of accidental harms. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26, 597–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2014.929137 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pizarro, D. A., Uhlmann, E. & Salovey, P. (2003). Asymmetry in judgments of moral blame and praise: The role of perceived metadesires. Psychological Science, 14, 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.03433 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Pratt, M. W., Diessner, R., Hunsberger, B., Pancer, S. M. & Savoy, K. (1991). Four pathways in the analysis of adult development and aging: Comparing analyses of reasoning about personal-life dilemmas. Psychology and Aging, 6, 666–675. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.6.4.666 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Pratt, M. W., Diessner, R., Pratt, A., Hunsberger, B. & Pancer, S. M. (1996). Moral and social reasoning and perspective taking in later life: A longitudinal study. Psychology and Aging, 11, 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.11.1.66 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Preacher, K. J. & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.40.3.879 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Reuter-Lorenz, P. A. & Sylvester, C. Y. (2005). The cognitive neuroscience of aging and working memory. In R. CabezaL. NybergD. ParkEds., The cognitive neuroscience of aging (pp. 186–217). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Salthouse, T. A. (2004). What and when of cognitive aging. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 140–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00293.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Serafin, M. & Surian, L. (2004). Il Test degli Occhi: uno strumento per valutare la “teoria della mente” [The Eyes Test: A tool for assessing Theory of Mind]. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 31, 213–236. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sze, J., Gyurak, A., Goodkind, M. S. & Levenson, R. W. (2012). Greater prosocial and empathic responding in late life. Emotion, 12, 1129–1140. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025011 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Vicaria, I. M. & Isaacowitz, D. M. (2016). Age-related changes in motivation: Do they influence emotional experience across adulthood and old age?. In T. S. BraverEd., Motivation and cognitive control (pp. 361–380). New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wechsler, D. (1981). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – Revised. New York, NY: Psychological Corporation. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Woo, B. M., Steckler, C. M., Le, D. T. & Hamlin, J. K. (2017). Social evaluation of intentional, truly accidental, and negligently accidental helpers and harmers by 10-month-old infants. Cognition, 168, 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.029 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Young, L., Cushman, F., Hauser, M. & Saxe, R. (2007). The neural basis of the interaction between theory of mind and moral judgment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 8235–8240. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701408104 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Young, L., Scholz, J. & Saxe, R. (2011). Neural evidence for “intuitive prosecution”: The use of mental state information for negative moral verdicts. Social Neuroscience, 6, 302–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2010.529712 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google Scholar

  • Young, L. & Tsoi, L. (2013). When mental states matter, when they don’t, and what that means for morality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 585–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12044 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Yuill, N. (1984). Young chidren’s coordination of motive and outcome in judgments of satisfaction and morality. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2, 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835x.1984.tb00536.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Yuill, N. & Perner, J. (1988). Intentionality and knowledge in children’s judgments of actors responsibility and recipients emotional reaction. Developmental Psychology, 24, 358–365. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.24.3.358 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar