The Effects of Activating Gender-Related Social Roles on Financial Risk-Taking
Abstract
Abstract: Previous studies observed differences between men and women in terms of their financial risk-taking. However, these differences may stem not only from the gender of the decision-maker but also from other factors, such as stereotypical gender social roles. Media content exposes both men and women to stereotypical portrayals of their gender, and this might temporarily activate thoughts related to their social roles. A question arises whether such activation might impact the way people make risky financial decisions. The present experimental study investigated whether temporarily activated gender-related social roles influence the risk-taking propensities of men and women (N = 319) in the context of gambling and investment choices. The results show that activating a stereotypically male social role (professional employee) made both men and women more prone to take financial risks relative to a control condition. Furthermore, activating a stereotypically female social role (homemaker) lowered the propensity to take financial risks in both genders for the investment domain and in women only for the gambling domain. This study contributes to the literature on gender differences in economic behavior by showing that researchers should not overlook sociocultural factors.
References
(2006). A domain-specific risk-taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgment and Decision Making, 1(1), 33–47.
(2020). Gender differences in gambling exposure and at-risk gambling behavior. Journal of Gambling Studies, 36(2), 445–457. 10.1007/s10899-019-09884-7
(2010). Stereotype threat affects financial decision making. Psychological Science, 21(10), 1411–1416. 10.1177/0956797610384146
(2017). Hazardziści [The gamblers]. https://cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2017/K_068_17.PDF
(2013). Experimental methods: Eliciting risk preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 87, 43–51. 10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.023
(2015). Men as cultural ideals: Cultural values moderate gender stereotype content. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(4), 622–635. 10.1037/pspi0000027
(2017). Raport: Kobiety w ‘męskich’ zawodach [Report: Women in ‘male’ professions]. https://www.delab.uw.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Kobiety-w-meskich-zawodach_raport-1.pdf
(2009). The influence of social anchorage on the gender difference in the use of mental health services. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 36(3), 372–384. 10.1007/s11414-009-9168-0
(1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Erlbaum.
(2012). Social role theory. In P. Van LangeA. W. KruglanskiE. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories in social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 458–476). SAGE Publications.
(2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. EckesH. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social Psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
(2010). A meta-analysis of gender roles in advertising. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(4), 418–440. 10.1007/s11747-009-0181-x
(2021). Gender Equality Index. https://eige.europa.eu/publications/gender-equality-index-2021-report
(2007). G*Power 3.1 manual. Behavioral Research Methods.
(2015). Does stereotype threat influence performance of girls in stereotyped domains? A meta-analysis. Journal of School Psychology, 53(1), 25–44. 10.1016/j.jsp.2014.10.002
(2009). Relationships between individualism–collectivism, gender, and direct or indirect aggression: A study in China, Poland, and the US. Aggressive behavior. Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 35(1), 24–30. 10.1002/ab.20292
(2019). The universality of the portrayal of gender in television advertisements: A review of the studies this century. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8(2), 109–124. 10.1037/ppm0000161
(2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644–1655. 10.1257/000282802762024700
(1998). Are women more risk-averse? Economic Inquiry, 36(4), 620–630. 10.1111/j.1465-7295.1998.tb01740.x
(2002). Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 77(2), 129–146. 10.1901/jeab.2002.77-129
(2018). Asymmetry of risk perception in various social roles. National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald, 3, 329–337. 10.32461/2226-3209.3.2018.170951
(2005). State lotteries and consumer behavior. Journal of Public Economics, 89(11-12), 2269–2299. 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.07.004
(2020). Gender differences in risk behavior and the link to household effects and individual wealth. Journal of Economic Psychology, 80, 102266. 10.1016/j.joep.2020.102266
(2011). Real and hypothetical rewards in self-control and social discounting. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(6), 552–564. 10.1017/S1930297500002515
(2014). An empirical study of gender differences in online gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30(1), 71–88. 10.1007/s10899-012-9341-x
(2014). The power of stereotyping and confirmation bias to overwhelm accurate assessment: The case of economics, gender, and risk aversion. Journal of Economic Methodology, 21(3), 211–231. 10.1080/1350178X.2014.939691
(2019). When thinking back can hold us back: How being a follower can affect women’s loss-aversion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(2), 400–406. 10.1037/xge0000491
(2022). Gender stereotypes and self-characterizations in Germany and Nigeria: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 52(8), 764–780. 10.1111/jasp.12801
(2013). Role of gender difference in financial investment decisions: A quantitative analysis with special reference to risk aversion and overconfidence approach amongst management graduates in Lucknow city of Uttar Pradesh. International Journal of Research in Commerce & Management, 4(11), 28–33.
(2010). The effect of priming gender roles on women’s implicit gender beliefs and career aspirations. Social Psychology, 41(3), 192–202. 10.1027/1864-9335/a000027
Sekścińska, K., Jaworska, D., Rudzinska-Wojciechowska, J., & Kusev, P. (2023). The effects of activating gender-related social roles on gambling risk-taking propensity. https://osf.io/xe6p4(2016). The influence of different social roles activation on women's financial and consumer choices. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 365. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00365
(2019). A feminist review of behavioral economic research on gender differences. Feminist Economics, 25(2), 1–35. 10.1080/13545701.2018.1532595
(2021). Gender differences in financial literacy: The role of stereotype threat. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 192, 405–416. 10.1016/j.jebo.2021.10.015
(1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458. 10.1126/science.7455683
(2002). A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15(4), 263–290. 10.1002/bdm.414z
(1990). Measuring sex stereotypes: A multination study. Sage.
