Effects of Light-Hearted and Serious Entertainment on Enjoyment of the First and Third Person
Abstract
Abstract. This was a study on the perceived enjoyment of different movie genres. In an online experiment, 176 students were randomly divided into two groups (n = 88) and asked to estimate how much they, their closest friends, and young people in general enjoyed either serious or light-hearted movies. These self–other differences in perceived enjoyment of serious or light-hearted movies were also assessed as a function of differing individual motivations underlying entertainment media consumption. The results showed a clear third-person effect for light-hearted movies and a first-person effect for serious movies. The third-person effect for light-hearted movies was moderated by level of hedonic motivation, as participants with high hedonic motivations did not perceive their own and others’ enjoyment of light-hearted films differently. However, eudaimonic motivations did not moderate first-person perceptions in the case of serious films.
References
2010). Mediated voyeurism and the guilty pleasure of consuming reality television. Media Psychology, 13, 201–221. doi: 10.1080/15213269.2010.502871
(1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47(1), 1–15. doi: 10.1086/268763
(1985). Hegemony and mass culture: A semiotic approach. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 979. doi: 10.1086/228173
(1993). Biased optimism and the third-person effect. Journalism Quarterly, 70, 58–67. doi: 10.1177/107769909307000107
(2007). The social implications of enjoyment of different types of music, movies, and television programming. Western Journal of Communication, 71, 259–271. doi: 10.1080/10570310701653794
(2001). The third-person effect in perceptions of the influence of television violence. Journal of Communication, 51, 283–299. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02881.x
(2012, May). Third-person perceptions and different movie genres, Paper presented at the International Communication Association, Boston, MA
(2005). Third-person effect and internet pornography: The influence of collectivism and internet self-efficacy. Journal of Communication, 55, 292–310. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02673.x
(2006). Reality television and third-person perception. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50, 253–269. doi: 10.1207/s15506878jobem5002_5
(1997). Support for censorship of violent and misogynic rap lyrics: An analysis of the third-person effect. Communication Research, 24, 153–174. doi: 10.1177/009365097024002003
(2005). Rethinking the target corollary: The effects of social distance, perceived exposure, and perceived predispositions on first-person and third-person perceptions. Communication Research, 32, 822–843. doi: 10.1177/0093650205281059
(2010). Appreciation as audience response: Exploring entertainment gratifications beyond hedonism. Human Communication Research, 36, 53–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01368.x
(2011). Appreciation of entertainment: The importance of meaningfulness via virtue and wisdom. Journal of Media Psychology, 23, 29–33. doi: 10.1027/1864-1105/a000029
(2012). Elevation in response to entertainment portrayals of moral virtue. Human Communication Research, 38, 360–378. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01427.x
(2011). Entertainment as pleasurable and meaningful: Identifying hedonic and eudaimonic motivations for entertainment consumption. Journal of Communication, 61, 984–1004. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01585.x
(2000). Third-person perception of television-viewing behavior. Journal of Communication, 50, 25–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02832.x
(2012). Characterizing mood management as need satisfaction: The effects of intrinsic needs on selective exposure and mood repair. Journal of Communication, 62, 437–453. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01649.x
(2001). Third-person perception of television violence: The role of self-perceived knowledge. Media Psychology, 3, 211–236. doi: 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_01
(2010). Third-person perception as an impression management tactic. Media Psychology, 13, 301–322. doi: 10.1080/15213269.2010.503516
(2009).
(The influence of presumed media influence: Origins and implications of the third-person perception . In R. L. NabiM. B. OliverEds., The Sage handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 99–112). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.2010). Defining media enjoyment as the satisfaction of intrinsic needs. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 758–777. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01513.x
(2012). Beyond pleasure: Exploring the eudaimonic entertainment experience. Human Communication Research, 38, 406–428. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01434.x
(1988). Mood management through communication choices. American Behavioral Scientist, 31, 327–340. doi: 10.1177/000276488031003005
(