Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Next article
Original Article

Everybody Follows the Crowd?

Effects of Opinion Polls and Past Election Results on Electoral Preferences

Published Online:October 28, 2015https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000160

Abstract

Abstract. Opinion polls are a well-established part of political news coverage, especially during election campaigns. At the same time, there has been controversial debate over the possible influences of such polls on voters’ electoral choices. The most prominent influence discussed is the bandwagon effect: It states that voters tend to support the expected winner of an upcoming election, and use polls to determine who the likely winner will be. This study investigated the mechanisms underlying the effect. In addition, we inquired into the role of past electoral performances of a candidate and analyzed how these (as well as polls) are used as heuristic cues for the assessment of a candidate’s personal characteristics. Using an experimental design, we found that both polls and past election results influence participants’ expectations regarding which candidate will succeed. Moreover, higher competence was attributed to a candidate, if recipients believe that the majority of voters favor that candidate. Through this attribution of competence, both information about prior elections and current polls shaped voters’ electoral preferences.

References

  • Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Anderson, C. J. & Brettschneider, F. (2003). The likeable winner versus the competent loser. Candidate images and the German Election of 2002. German Politics and Society, 66, 95–118. doi: 10.3167/104503003782353538 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ansolabehere, S. & Iyengar, S. (1994). Of horseshoes and horse races: Experimental studies of the impact of poll results on electoral behavior. Political Communication, 11, 413–430. doi: 10.1080/10584609.1994.9963048 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70, 1–70. doi: 10.1037/h0093718 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bartels, L. M. (2002). The impact of candidate traits in American presidential elections. In A. KingEd., Leaders’ personalities and the outcomes of democratic elections (pp. 44–70). New York: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Brettschneider, F. (2008). The news media’s use of public opinion polls. In W. DonsbachM. W. TraugottEds., The SAGE handbook of public opinion research (pp. 479–486). Los Angeles, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bruckmüller, S. & Abele, A. E. (2013). The density of the Big Two. How are agency and communion structurally represented? Social Psychology, 44, 63–74. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000145 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Ceci, S. J. & Kain, E. L. (1982). Jumping on the bandwagon with the underdog: The impact of attitude polls and polling behavior. Public Opinion Quarterly, 46, 228–242. doi: 10.1086/268715 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cialdini, R. B. (2009). Influence: Science and practice. New York: William Morrow. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cialdini, R. B. & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Deutsch, M. & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informative social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 51, 629–636. doi: 10.1037/h0046408 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Faas, T. & Schmitt-Beck, R. (2007). Wahrnehmung und Wirkungen politischer Meinungsumfragen. Eine Exploration zur Bundestagswahl 2005 [Perceptions and effects of political opinion polls: An exploration on the Federal election 2005]. In F. BrettschneiderO. NiedermayerB. WeßelsEds., Die Bundestagswahl 2005. Analysen des Wahlkampfes und der Wahlergebnisse [The Federal Election 2005. Analyses of the electoral campaign and the election results] (pp. 233–267). Wiesbaden: VS. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C. & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social perception: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11, 77–83. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fleitas, D. W. (1971). Bandwagon and underdog effects in minimal-information elections. The American Political Science Review, 65, 434–438. doi: 10.2307/1954459 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Fridkin, K. L. & Kenney, P. J. (2011). The role of candidate traits in campaigns. The Journal of Politics, 73, 61–73. doi: 10.1017/S0022381610000861 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Funk, C. L. (1997). Implications of political expertise in candidate trait evaluations. Political Research Quarterly, 50, 675–697. doi: 10.2307/448922 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Goldschmied, N. & Vandello, J. A. (2009). The advantage of disadvantage: Underdogs in the political arena. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 31, 24–31. doi: 10.1080/01973530802659810 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gunther, A. C., Christen, C. T., Liebhart, J. L. & Chia, S. C.-Y. (2001). Congenial public, contrary press, and biased estimates of the climate of opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65, 295–320. doi: 10.1086/322846 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hardmeier, S. (2008). The effect of published polls on citizens. In W. DonsbachM. W. TraugottEds., The SAGE handbook of public opinion research (pp. 504–513). Los Angeles, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Holtz-Bacha, C. (2012). Opinion polls and the media in Germany: A productive but critical relationship. In C. Holtz-BachaJ. StrömbäckEds., Opinion polls and the media: Reflecting and shaping public opinion (pp. 93–112). Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hopmann, D. N. (2010). Vom emotionalen Underdog zur bewussten Strategie: Wie Meinungsumfragen die Parteipräferenzen der Wähler beeinflussen [From an emotional underdog to an intentional strategy: How opinion polls influence voter’s party preferences]. In T. FaasK. ArzheimerS. RoßteutscherEds., Information–Wahrnehmung–Emotion. Politische Psychologie in der Wahl- und Einstellungsforschung [Information-perception-emotion. Political psychology in research on elections and attitudes] (pp. 51–69. Wiesbaden: VS. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L.-T. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, (6, pp. 1–55). doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Irwin, G. A. & van Holsteyn, J. J. M. (2002). According to the polls: The influence of opinion polls on expectations. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 92–104. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Joslyn, M. R. (1997). The public nature of personal opinion: The impact of collective sentiment on individual appraisal. Political Behavior, 19, 337–363. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Judd, C. M., James-Hawkins, L., Yzerbyt, V. & Kashima, Y. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899–913. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.899 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kahn, K. F. (1993). Incumbency and the news media in the U.S. Senate elections: An experimental investigation. Political Research Quarterly, 46, 715–740. doi: 10.2307/448927 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Koch, T. & Obermaier, M. (2014). With heart and (no) mind? How recipients negatively infer missing information about politicians and how this affects the assessment of the speaker. Communication Research. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0093650214565005 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Krizan, Z., Miller, J. C. & Johar, O. (2010). Wishful thinking in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election. Psychological Science, 21, 140–146. doi: 10.1177/0956797609356421 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lang, K. & Lang, G. E. (1984). The impact of polls on public opinion. Annuals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 472, 129–142. doi: 10.1177/0002716284472001012 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36, 343–356. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.36.4.343 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Latané, B. & Wolf, S. (1981). The social impact of majorities and minorities. Psychological Review, 88, 438–453. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.438 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lau, R. R. & Redlawsk, D. P. (2001). Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 951–971. doi: 10.2307/2669334 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lavrakas, P. J., Holley, J. K. & Miller, P. V. (1991). Public reactions to polling news during the 1988 presidential election campaign. In P. J. LavrakasJ. K. HolleyEds., Polling and presidential election coverage (pp. 151–183). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, C. (1984). Back on the bandwagon: The effect of opinion polls on public opinion. British Journal of Political Science, 15, 51–74. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400004063 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McAllister, I. & Studlar, D. T. (1991). Bandwagon, underdog, or projection? Opinion polls and electoral choice in Britain, 1979–1987. Journal of Politics, 53, 720–741. doi: 10.2307/2131577 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McDermott, M. L. (2005). Candidate occupations and voter information shortcuts. The Journal of Politics, 67, 201–219. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00314.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mehrabian, A. (1998). Effects of poll reports on voter preferences. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 2119–2130. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01363.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Miler, K. C. (2009). The limitations of heuristics for political elites. Political Psychology, 30, 863–894. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00731.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Miller, A. H. (1990). Public judgments of Senate and House candidates. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 15, 525–542. doi: 10.2307/439895 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Moy, P. & Rinke, E. M. (2012). Attitudinal and behavioral consequences of published opinion polls. In C. Holtz-BachaJ. StrömbäckEds., Opinion polls and the media: Reflecting and shaping public opinion (pp. 225–245). Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mutz, D. C. (1992). Impersonal influence: Effects of representations of public opinion on political attitudes. Political Behavior, 14, 89–122. doi: 10.1007/BF00992237 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mutz, D. C. (1997). Mechanisms of momentum: Does thinking make it so? The Journal of Politics, 59, 104–125. doi: 10.2307/2998217 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mutz, D. C. (1998). Impersonal influence. How perceptions of mass collectives affect political attitudes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Nadeau, R., Niemi, R. & Amato, T. (1994). Expectations and preferences in British General Elections. American Political Science Review, 88, 371–381. doi: 10.2307/2944710 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Navazio, R. (1977). An experimental approach to bandwagon research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 41, 217–225. doi: 10.1086/268376 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24, 43–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Popkin, S. L. (1991). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rosenberg, S., Nelson, C. & Vivekananthan, P. S. (1968). A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 283–294. doi: 10.1037/h0026086 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schmitt-Beck, R. (1996). Mass media, the electorate, and the bandwagon. A study of communication effects on vote choice in Germany. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8, 266–291. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/8.3.266 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schoen, H. (2002). Wirkung von Wahlprognosen auf Wahlen [Effects of opinion polls on elections]. In T. BergEd., Moderner Wahlkampf: Blick hinter die Kulissen [Modern election campaigns: A look behind the scenes] (pp. 171–191). Opladen: Leske + Budrich. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Simon, H. (1954). Bandwagon and underdog effects and the possibility of election predictions. Public Opinion Quarterly (pp. 245–253). 18. doi: 10.1086/266513 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Sonck, N. & Loosveldt, G. (2010). Impact of poll results on personal opinions and perceptions of collective opinion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22, 230–254. doi: 10.1093/ijpor/edp045 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Thompson, M., Gilkerson, N., Carver, D., Shelton, A. & Merea, S. (2009). Mind the gap: The bandwagon effect and the trailing candidate. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association. IL: Chicago. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zerback, T., Koch, T. & Krämer, B. (2015). Thinking of others: Effects of implicit and explicit media cues on climate of opinion perceptions. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1077699015574481 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar