Skip to main content

Explicating the Emotion Spillover Effect

At the Intersection of Motivational Activation, Resource Allocation, and Consolidation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000164

Abstract. This study proposed and tested the idea that the processing of advertisements following emotionally arousing stimuli is a function of the interaction between motivational system activation and consolidation of the preceding message content in memory. To explain this phenomenon, two competing hypotheses were posed: the motivational decay hypothesis and the consolidation interference hypothesis. Physiological, behavioral, and self-reported data were used to test the predictions. The results demonstrated higher levels of physiological arousal and higher levels of physiological and self-reported positivity and negativity when processing advertisements preceded by arousing positive and negative movie clips. The heart rate data showed that the appetitive motivational system facilitated higher cognitive effort (slower heart rate), and the aversive motivational system facilitated lower cognitive effort (faster heart rate). The state of cognitive overload was reached during the first 10 s of the ads following negative arousing clips, while during ads following positive arousing clips, the cognitive system functioned at the maximum of its capacity. Overall, the results are more supportive of the consolidation interference hypothesis.

References

  • Abercrombie, H. C., Speck, N. S. & Monticelli, R. M. (2006). Endogenous cortisol elevations are related to memory facilitation only in individuals who are emotionally aroused. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 31(2), 187–196. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.06.008 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Andreano, J. M. & Cahill, L. (2006). Glucocorticoid release and memory consolidation in men and women. Psychological Science, 17(6), 466–470. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01729.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1982). Implications of neuropsychological evidence for theories of normal memory. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 298, 59–72. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1982.0072 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the False Discovery Rate-a new and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 57, 289–300. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., Cuthbert, B. N. & Lang, P. J. (2001). Emotion and motivation I: Defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. Emotion, 1(3), 276–298. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.1.3.276 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bradley, M. M. & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25(1), 49–59. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Buchanan, T. W. & Lovallo, W. R. (2001). Enhanced memory for emotional material following stress-level cortisol treatment in humans. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 26(3), 307–317. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4530(00)00058-5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bushman, B. J. (1998). Effects of television violence on memory for commercial messages. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4(4), 291–307. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.4.4.291 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bushman, B. J. (2002). Does venting anger feed or extinguish the flame? Catharsis, rumination, distraction, anger and aggressive responding. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(6), 724–731. doi: 10.1177/0146167202289002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bushman, B. J. & Phillips, C. M. (2001). If the television program bleeds, memory for the advertisement recedes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(2), 43–47. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00111 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cacioppo, J. T. & Berntson, G. G. (1994). Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin, 115(3), 401–423. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.115.3.401 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cacioppo, J. T. & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Emotion. Annual Reviews: Psychology, 50, 191–214. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.191 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L. & Berntson, G. G. (1999). The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(5), 839–855. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.839 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cacioppo, J. T. & Petty, R. E. (1989). The elaboration likelihood model: The role of affect and affect-laden information processing in persuasion. In P. CafferataA. M. TyboutEds., Cognitive and affective responses to advertising (pp. 69–89). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books/D. C. Heath & Com. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cahill, L., Gorski, L. & Le, K. (2003). Enhanced human memory consolidation with post-learning stress: Interaction with the degree of arousal at encoding. Learning & Memory, 10(4), 270–274. doi: 10.1101/lm.62403 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Duff, B. R. L. & Faber, R. J. (2011). Missing the mark: Advertising avoidance and distractor devaluation. Journal of Advertising, 40(2), 51–62. doi: 10.2753/JOA0091-3367400204 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gunter, B., Furnham, A. & Frost, C. (1994). Recall by young people of television advertisements as a function of programme type and audience evaluation. Psychological Reports, 75(3), 1107–1120. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1994.75.3.1107 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gunter, B., Furnham, A. & Pappa, E. (2005). Effects of television violence on memory for violent and nonviolent advertising. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(8), 1680–1697. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02190.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ito, T. A. & Cacioppo, J. T. (2000). Electrophysiological evidence of implicit explicit categorization processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(6), 660–676. doi: 10.1006/jesp.2000.1430 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ito, T. A., Larsen, J. T., Smith, N. K. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1998). Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4), 887–900. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.887 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jarvis, B. G. (2008). MediaLab [Computer software], New York: Empirisoft. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kleinsmith, L. J. & Kaplan, S. (1963). Paired-associate learning as a function of arousal and interpolated interval. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(2), 190–193. doi: 10.1037/h0040288 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Knight, M. & Mather, M. (2009). Reconciling findings of emotion-induced memory enhancement and impairment of preceding items. Emotion, 9(6), 763–781. doi: 10.1037/a0017281 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lang, A. (2006). Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing to design effective cancer communication messages. Journal of Communication, 56(s1), S57–S80. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00283.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lang, A. & Yegiyan, N. S. (2009). Motivated message processing: How media elicit motivation which influences how media are processed. In J. McCroskeyK. FloydM. BeattyEds., Biological dimensions of communication (pp. 135–159). New York: Hampton Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lang, A., Bradley, S. D., Park, B., Shin, M. & Chung, Y. (2006). Parsing the resource pie: Using STRTs to measure attention to mediated messages. Media Psychology, 8(4), 369–394. doi: 10.1207/s1532785xmep0804_3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lang, A., Park, B., Sanders-Jackson, A., Wilson, B. D. & Wang, Z. (2007). Cognition and emotion in TV message processing: How valence, arousing content, structural complexity, and information density affect the availability of cognitive resources. Media Psychology, 10(3), 317–338. doi: 10.1080/15213260701532880 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lang, P. J. & Bradley, M. M. (2010). Emotion and the motivational brain. Biological Psychology, 84(3), 437–450. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M. & Cuthbert, B. N. (1997). Motivated attention: Affect, activation, and action. In P. J. LangR. F. SimonsM. T. BalabanEds., Attention and orienting: Sensory and motivational processes (pp. 97–135). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Levonian, E. (1966). Attention and consolidation as factors in retention. Psychonomic Science, 6(6), 275–276. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Liu, D. L. J., Graham, S. & Zorawski, M. (2008). Enhanced selective memory consolidation following post-learning pleasant and aversive arousal. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 89(1), 36–46. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2007.09.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Müller, G. E. & Pilzecker, A. (1900). Experimentelle Beiträge zur Lehre vom Gedächtnis [Experimental contributions to memory sciences]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie. Ergänzungsband, 1, 1–300. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nielson, K. A. & Powless, M. (2007). Positive and negative sources of emotional arousal enhance long-term word-list retention when induced as long as 30 min after learning. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 88(1), 40–47. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2007.03.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nielson, K. A., Yee, D. & Erickson, K. I. (2005). Memory enhancement by a semantically unrelated emotional arousal source induced after learning. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 84(1), 49–56. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2005.04.001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T. & Kasmer, J. A. (1988). The role of affect in the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. DonohewH. E. SypherE. T. HigginsEds., Communication, social cognition, and affect (pp. 117–146). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Segal, S. K. & Cahill, L. (2009). Endogenous noradrenergic activation and memory for emotional material in men and women. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34(9), 1263–1271. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.04.020 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smeets, T., Otgaar, H., Candel, I. & Wolf, O. T. (2008). True or false? memory is differentially affected by stress-induced cortisol elevations and sympathetic activity at consolidation and retrieval. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 33(10), 1378–1386. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.07.009 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1973). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, Oxford: Oregon Research Inst Retrieved from http://www.becomeanex.org First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vasey, M. W. & Thayer, J. F. (1987). The continuing problem of false positives in repeated measures ANOVA in psychophysiology: A multivariate solution. psychophysiology, 24(4), 479–486. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Walker, E. L. & Tarte, R. D. (1963). Memory storage as a function of arousal and time with homogeneous and heterogeneous lists. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2, 113–119. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(63)80075-4 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wang, Z. & Lang, A. (2012). Reconceptualizing excitation transfer as motivational activation changes and a test of the television program context effects. Media Psychology, 15(1), 68–92. doi: 10.1080/15213269.2011.649604 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yegiyan, N. S. (2012). Gun focus effect revisited: Emotional tone modulates information processing strategy. Communication Research, 39(6), 724–737. doi: 10.1177/0093650211400900 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yegiyan, N. S. & Lang, A. (2010). Processing central and peripheral detail: How content arousal and emotional tone influence encoding. Media Psychology, 13, 77–99. doi: 10.1080/15213260903563014 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yegiyan, N. S. & Yonelinas, A. P. (2011). Encoding details: Positive emotion leads to memory broadening. Cognition and Emotion, 25(7), 1255–1262. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zillmann, D. (1971). Excitation transfer in communication-mediated aggressive behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7(4), 419–434. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(71)90075-8 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zillmann, D., Katcher, A. H. & Milavsky, B. (1972). Excitation transfer from physical exercise to subsequent aggressive behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 8(3), 247–259. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1031(72)80005-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar