Skip to main content
Original Article

How News Type Matters

Indirect Effects of Media Use on Political Participation Through Knowledge and Efficacy

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000201

Abstract. Today, citizens have the possibility to use many different types of news media and participate politically in various ways. This study examines how use of different news types (hard and soft TV news as well as printed and online versions of broadsheet and tabloid newspapers) indirectly affects changes in offline and online political participation through current affairs knowledge and internal efficacy during nonelection and election time. We use a four-wave national panel survey from Denmark (N = 2,649) and show that use of hard TV news and broadsheets as well as online tabloids positively affects changes in both offline and online political participation through current affairs knowledge and internal efficacy. Use of soft TV news and printed tabloids has a negative indirect effect. These results are more pronounced for online political participation and during election time. However, use of soft TV news also has a positive direct effect on changes in political participation, which suggests a positive impact via other processes.

References

  • Albæk, E., van Dalen, A., De Vreese, C. H. & Jebril, N. (2014). Political journalism in comparative perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Andersen, K., De Vreese, C. H. & Albæk, E. (2016). Measuring media diet in a high-choice environment–testing the list-frequency technique. Communication Methods and Measures, 10(2–3), 81–98. doi: 10.1080/19312458.2016.1150973 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bakker, T. P. & De Vreese, C. H. (2011). Good news for the future? Young people, Internet use, and political participation. Communication Research, 38(4), 451–470. doi: 10.1177/0093650210381738 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barabas, J. & Jerit, J. (2009). Estimating the causal effects of media coverage on policy-specific knowledge. American Journal of Political Science, 53(1), 73–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00358.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barabas, J., Jerit, J., Pollock, W. & Rainey, C. (2014). The question(s) of political knowledge. American Political Science Review, 108(04), 840–855. doi: 10.1017/S0003055414000392 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baum, M. A. (2002). Sex, lies, and war: How soft news brings foreign policy to the inattentive public. American Political Science Review, 96(01), 91–109. doi: 10.1017/S0003055402004252 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baum, M. A. (2003). Soft news and political knowledge: Evidence of absence or absence of evidence? Political Communication, 20(2), 173–190. doi: 10.1080/10584600390211181 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baum, M. A. & Jamison, A. S. (2006). The Oprah effect: How soft news helps inattentive citizens vote consistently. Journal of Politics, 68(4), 946–959. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00480.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Berry, J. M., Portney, K. E. & Thomson, K. (1993). The rebirth of urban democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bimber, B. (1999). The Internet and citizen communication with government: Does the medium matter? Political Communication, 16, 409–428. doi: 10.1080/105846099198569 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brants, K. (1998). Who’s afraid of infotainment? European Journal of Communication, 13(3), 315–335. doi: 10.1177/0267323198013003002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brants, K. & Neijens, P. (1998). The infotainment of politics. Political Communication, 15(2), 149–164. doi: 10.1080/10584609809342363 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cho, J., Shah, D. V., McLeod, J. M., McLeod, D. M., Scholl, R. M. & Gotlieb, M. R. (2009). Campaigns, reflection, and deliberation: Advancing an O-S-R-O-R model of communication effects. Communication Theory, 19(1), 66–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.01333.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Corrigall-Brown, C. & Wilkes, R. (2014). Media exposure and the engaged citizen: How the media shape political participation. The Social Science Journal, 51(3), 408–421. doi: 10.1016/j.soscij.2014.03.009 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Delli Carpini, M. X. & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans Know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • De Vreese, C. H. & Boomgaarden, H. (2006). News, political knowledge and participation: The differential effects of news media exposure on political knowledge and participation. Acta Politica, 41(4), 317–341. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500164 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Drew, D. & Weaver, D. (2006). Voter learning in the 2004 presidential Election: Did the media matter? Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(1), 25–42. doi: 10.1177/107769900608300103 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ekman, J. & Amnå, E. (2012). Political participation and civic engagement: Towards a new typology. Human Affairs, 22(3), 283–300. doi: 10.2478/s13374-012-0024-1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Elenbaas, M., De Vreese, C., Schuck, A. & Boomgaarden, H. (2014). Reconciling passive and motivated learning: The saturation-conditional impact of media coverage and motivation on political information. Communication Research, 41(4), 481–504. doi: 10.1177/0093650212467032 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Esser, F. (1999). ‘Tabloidization’ of news: A comparative analysis of Anglo-American and German press journalism. European Journal of Communication, 14(3), 291–324. doi: 10.1177/0267323199014003001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Finkel, S. E. (1985). Reciprocal effects of participation and political efficacy: A panel analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 29(4), 891–913. doi: 10.2307/2111186 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gibson, R. & Cantijoch, M. (2013). Conceptualizing and Measuring participation in the age of the Internet: Is online political engagement really different to offline? The Journal of Politics, 75(3), 701–716. doi: 10.1017/S0022381613000431 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hallin, D. C. & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three Models of media and politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hansen, K. M. & Pedersen, R. T. (2014). Campaigns matter: How voters become knowledgeable and efficacious during election campaigns. Political Communication, 31(2), 303–324. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2013.815296 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hosch-Dayican, B. (2014). Online political activities as emerging forms of political participation: How do they fit in the conceptual map? Acta Politica, 49(3), 342–346. doi: 10.1057/ap.2014.7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jebril, N., De Vreese, C. H., van Dalen, A. & Albæk, E. (2013). The effects of human interest and conflict news frames on the dynamics of political knowledge gains: Evidence from a cross-national study. Scandinavian Political Studies, 36(3), 201–226. doi: 10.1111/1467-9477.12003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jung, N., Kim, Y. & de Zúñiga, H. G. (2011). The mediating role of knowledge and efficacy in the effects of communication on political participation. Mass Communication and Society, 14(4), 407–430. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2010.496135 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kinder, D. R. (2003). Communication and politics in the age of information. In D. O. SearsL. HuddyR. JervisEds., Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 357–393). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kenski, K. & Stroud, N. J. (2006). Connections between Internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(2), 173–192. doi: 10.1207/s15506878jobem5002_1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Markus, G. B. (1979). Analyzing Panel Data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A. & Moy, P. (1999). Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political Communication, 16(3), 315–336. doi: 10.1080/105846099198659 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, A. H., Goldenberg, E. N. & Erbring, L. (1979). Type-set politics: Impact of newspapers on public confidence. American Political Science Review, 73(1), 67–84. doi: 10.2307/1954731 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moeller, J., De Vreese, C., Esser, F. & Kunz, R. (2014). Pathway to political participation: The influence of online and offline news media on internal efficacy and turnout of first-time voters. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(5), 689–700. doi: 10.1177/0002764213515220 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moy, P., Xenos, M. A. & Hess, V. K. (2005). Communication and citizenship: Mapping the Political effects of infotainment. Mass Communication and Society, 8(2), 111–131. doi: 10.1207/s15327825mcs0802_3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Norris, P. (2000). A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies. Cambridge; UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Prior, M. (2007). Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reinemann, C., Stanyer, J., Scherr, S. & Legnante, G. (2012). Hard and soft news: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 221–239. doi: 10.1177/1464884911427803 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schuck, A. R. T., Vliegenthart, R. & De Vreese, C. H. (2016a). Who’s afraid of conflict? The mobilizing effect of conflict framing in campaign news. British Journal of Political Science, 46(01), 177–194. doi: 10.1017/S0007123413000525 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schuck, A. R. T., Vliegenthart, R. & De Vreese, C. H. (2016b). Matching theory and data: Why combining media content with survey data matters. British Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 205–213. doi: 10.1017/S0007123415000228 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Strömbäck, J. (2005). In search of a standard: Four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism. Journalism Studies, 6(3), 331–345. doi: 10.1080/14616700500131950 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Togeby, L. (2004). Man har et standpunkt… om stabilitet og forandring i befolkningens holdninger [One has a stand…: about stability and change in public attitudes]. Aarhus, Denmark: Universitetsforlag. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Van Aelst, P. & de Swert, K. (2009). Politics in the news: Do campaigns matter? Communications, 34(1), 149–68. doi: 10.1515/COMM.2009.011 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Williams, B. A. & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2011). After broadcast news: Media regimes, democracy, and the new information environment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zaller, J. (2003). A new standard of news quality: Burglar alarms for the monitorial citizen. Political Communication, 20(2), 109–130. doi: 10.1080/10584600390211136 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zukin, C., Keeter, S., Andolina, M., Jenkins, K. & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2006). A new engagement? Political participation, civic life, and the changing American citizen. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar