Cross-Cutting Exposure on Facebook and Political Participation

References

• Bakshy, E., Messing, S. & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa1160 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Barthel, M., Shearer, E., Gottfried, J. & Mitchell, A. (2015). News habits on Facebook and Twitter. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2015/07/14/news-habits-on-facebook-and-twitter/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Bode, L., Vrage, E. K., Borah, P. & Shah, D. V. (2014). A new space for political behavior: Political social networking and its democratic consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 414–425. doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12048 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Borah, P. (2013). Interactions of news frames and incivility in the political blogosphere: Examining perceptual outcomes. Political Communication, 30(3), 456–473. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2012.737426 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Borah, P. (2014). Does it matter where you read the news story? Interaction of incivility and news frames in the political blogosphere. Communication Research, 41(6), 809–827. doi: 10.1177/0093650212449353 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Brader, T. (2005). Striking a responsive chord: How political ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions. American Journal of Political Science, 49(2), 388–405. doi: 10.2307/3647684 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Brady, H. E., Verba, S. & Schlozman, K. L. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 271–294. doi: 10.2307/2082425 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Brooks, D. J. & Geer, J. G. (2007). Beyond negativity: The effects of incivility on the electorate. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00233.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Carver, C. S. & Harmon-Jones, E. (2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 183–204. doi: 10.1037/a0013965 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Chang, C. (2001). The impacts of emotion elicited by print political advertising on candidate evaluation. Media Psychology, 3(2), 91–118. doi: 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0302_01 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Coe, K., Kenski, K. & Rains, S. A. (2014). Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of incivility in newspaper website comments. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 658–679. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12104 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Dillard, J. P. & Shen, L. (2007). Self-report measures of discrete emotions. In R. A. ReynoldsR. WoodsJ. D. BakerEds., Handbook of Research on Electronic Surveys and Measurement (pp. 330–333). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Dilliplane, D. (2011). All the news you want to hear: The impact of partisan news exposure on political participation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(2), 287–316. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfr006 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Eveland, W. P. & Hively, M. H. (2009). Political discussion frequency, network size, and “heterogeneity” of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 205–224. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01412.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Gruen, R. J. & DeLongis, A. (1986). Appraisal, coping, health status, and psychological symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 571–579. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.571 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Fraser, B. (1990). Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), 219–236. doi: 10.1016/0378-2166(90)90081-N First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions: Studies in emotion & social interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P. & Terschure, E. (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(2), 212–228.Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=buy.optionToBuy&id=1989-38947-001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Gervais, B. T. (2015). Incivility online: Affective and behavioral reactions to uncivil political posts in a web-based experiment. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 12(2), 167–185. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2014.997416 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N. & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319–336. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Hayes, A. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2014.962683 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Held, D. (2006). Models of democracy (3rd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Herbst, S. (2010). Rude democracy: Civility and incivility in American politics. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Hodson, G., Maio, G. R. & Esses, V. M. (2001). The role of attitudinal ambivalence in susceptibility to consensus information. Basis and Applied Social Psychology, 23(3), 197–205. doi: 10.1207/S15324834BASP2303_6 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Jung, N., Kim, Y. & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2011). The mediating role of knowledge and efficacy in the effects of communication on political participation. Mass Communication and Society, 14(4), 407–430. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2010.496135 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Keltner, D., Ellsworth, P. C. & Edwards, K. (1993). Beyond simple pessimism: Effects of sadness and anger on social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 740–752. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.740 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Kim, N. (2016). Beyond rationality: The role of anger and information in deliberation. Communication Research, 43(1), 3–24. doi: 10.1177/0093650213510943 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Kim, Y. (2011). The contribution of social network sites to exposure to political difference: The relationships among SNSs, online political messaging, and exposure to cross-cutting perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 971–977. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Kwak, N., Williams, A. E., Wang, X. & Lee, H. (2005). Talking politics and engaging politics: An examination of the interactive relationships between structural features of political talk and discussion engagement. Communication Research, 32(1), 87–111. doi: 10.1177/0093650204271400 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Lee, F. (2012). Does discussion with disagreement discourage all types of political participation? Survey evidence from Hong Kong. Communication Research, 39(4), 543–562. doi: 10.1177/0093650211398356 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Lee, J. K., Choi, J., Kim, C. & Kim, Y. (2014). Social media, network heterogeneity, and opinion polarization. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 702–722. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12077 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Lerner, J. S. & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 146–59. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.146 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R. & MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Matthes, J. & Marquart, F. (2015). A new look at campaign advertising and political engagement: Exploring the effects of opinion-congruent and -incongruent political advertisements. Communication Research, 42(1), 134–155. doi: 10.1177/0093650213514600 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Meffert, M. F., Guge, M. & Lodge, M. (2004). Good, bad, and ambivalent: The consequences of multidimensional political attitudes. In W. E. SarisP. M. SnidermanEds., Studies in public opinion: Attitudes, nonattitudes, measurement error, and change (pp. 63–92). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Mitchell, A., Gottfried, J. & Matsa, K. E. (2015). Millennials and political news. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2015/06/01/millennials-political-news/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Moehler, D. C. & Conroy-Krutz, J. (2015). Partisan media and engagement: A field experiment in a newly liberalized system. Political Communication, Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2015.1069768 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Mutz, D. C. (2002a). Cross-cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in practice. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 111–126. doi: 10.1017/S0003055402004264 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Mutz, D. C. (2002b). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 838–855. doi: 10.2307/3088437 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Nabi, R. L. (2010). The case for emphasizing discrete emotions in communication research. Communication Monographs, 77(2), 153–159. doi: 10.1080/03637751003790444 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Namkoong, K., Fung, T. & Scheufele, D. A. (2012). The politics of emotion: News media attention, emotional responses, and participation during the 2004 U.S. presidential election. Mass Communication and Society, 15(1), 25–45. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2011.563894 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• O’Sullivan, P. B. & Flanagin, A. J. (2003). Reconceptualizing ‘flaming’ and other problematic messages. New Media & Society, 5(1), 69–94. doi: 10.1177/1461444803005001908 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Pattie, C. J. & Johnston, R. J. (2009). Conversation, disagreement and political participation. Political Behavior, 31(2), 261–285. doi: 10.1007/s11109-008-9071-z First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Pew Research Center. (2010a). Portrait of the millennials. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/2010/03/11/portrait-of-the-millennials/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Pew Research Center. (2010b). Politically apathetic millennials. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/daily-number/politically-apathetic-millennials/ First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Preacher, K. J. & Hayes, A. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, 36(4), 717–731. doi: 10.3758/BF03206553 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Price, V., Cappella, J. N. & Nir, L. (2002). Does disagreement contribute to more deliberative opinion? Political Communication, 19(1), 95–112. doi: 10.1080/105846002317246506 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Scheufele, D. A., Hardy, B. W., Brossard, D., Waismel-Manor, I. S. & Nisbet, E. (2006). Democracy based on difference: Examining the links between structural heterogeneity, heterogeneity of discussion networks, and democratic citizenship. Journal of Communication, 56(4), 728–753. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00317.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Scott, J. P. (1980). The function of emotions in behavioral systems: A systems theory analysis. In R. PlutchikH. KellermanEds., Emotions: Theory, research, experience. New York, NY: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

• Smith, C. A. & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4), 813–38). Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3886875 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Sobieraj, S. & Berry, J. M. (2011). From incivility to outrage: Political discourse in blogs, talk radio, and cable news. Political Communication, 28(1), 19–41. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2010.542360 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Stroud, N. J., Muddiman, A. & Lee, J. K. (2014). Seeing media as group members: An evaluation of partisan bias perception. Journal of Communication, 64(5), 874–894. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12110 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Taber, C. S. & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Thompson, D. F. (2008). Deliberative democratic theory and empirical political science. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 497–520. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.081306.070555 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Valentino, N. A., Brader, T., Groenendyk, E. W., Gregorowicz, K. & Hutchings, V. L. (2011). Election night's alright for fighting: The role of emotions in political participation. Journal of Politics, 73(1), 156–170. doi: 10.1017/S0022381610000939 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Valkenburg, P. M. & Peter, J. (2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication, 63(2), 221–243. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12024 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Vallone, R. P., Ross, L. & Lepper, M. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 577–585. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.577 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Wojcieszak, M., Bimber, B., Feldman, L. & Stroud, N. J. (2015). Partisan news and political participation: Exploring mediated relationships. Political Communication. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2015.1051608 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

• Zhang, W. & Chang, L. (2014). Perceived speech conditions and disagreement of everyday talk: A proceduralist perspective of citizen deliberation. Communication Theory, 24(2), 124–145. doi: 10.1111/comt.12034 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar