Interactive Narratives Affecting Social Change
A Closer Look at the Relationship Between Interactivity and Prosocial Behavior
Abstract
Abstract. Interactive narratives offer interesting opportunities for the study of the impact of media on behavior. A growing amount of research on games advocating social change, including those focusing on interactive narratives, has highlighted their potential for attitudinal and behavioral impact. In this study, we examine the relationship between interactivity and prosocial behavior, as well as potential underlying processes. A yoked study design with 634 participants compared an interactive with a noninteractive narrative. Structural equation modeling revealed no significant differences in prosocial behavior between the interactive and noninteractive condition. However, support for the importance of appreciation for and engagement with a narrative on subsequent prosocial behavior was observed. In summary, while results shed light on processes underlying the relationship between both noninteractive and interactive narratives and prosocial behavior, they also highlight interactivity as a multifaceted concept worth examining in further detail.
References
(1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364.
(2014). Moved to think: The role of emotional media experiences in stimulating reflective thoughts. Journal of Media Psychology, 26(3), 125.
(2006). When choosing is not deciding: The effect of perceived responsibility on satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(2), 211–219.
(2007). The mediated moderation model of interactivity. Media Psychology, 9(3), 647–672.
(2009). Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12(4), 321–347.
(2013). Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(5), 365–376.
(2009). What do I care? Perceived ingroup responsibility and dehumanization as predictors of empathy felt for the victim group. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(6), 715–729.
(2002). House money effects in public good experiments. Experimental Economics, 5(3), 223–231.
(2014). What makes good games go viral? The role of technology use, efficacy, emotion and enjoyment in players’ decision to share a prosocial digital game. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 321–329.
(2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication & Society, 4(3), 245–264.
(2012). Interactivity and reward-related neural activation during a serious videogame. PLoS One, 7(3), e33909. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033909
(1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113.
(1987). The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 101(1), 91.
(2015). Elevation (sometimes) increases altruism: Choice and number of outcomes in elevating media effects. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 4(3), 236.
(2014). More than stories with buttons: Narrative, mechanics, and context as determinants of player experience in digital games. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 521–542.
(2013). Discovering statistics using r. London, UK: Sage.
(2014). Interactive narratives: Processes and outcomes in user-directed stories. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 479–500.
(2015). Entertainment-oriented gratifications of sports media: Contributors to suspense, hedonic enjoyment, and appreciation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(2), 259–277.
(2003). Measuring the acquisition of media-literacy skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(3), 330–355.
(2003). Social identity. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
(2014). Choose your own adventure: Interactive narratives and attitude change. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
(2015). Computerized simulation of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, knowledge gap, and news media use. InformationCommunication & Society, 18(6), 644–658.
(2008).
The effects of individualized feedback in digital educational games . In T. ConollyM. StansfieldEds., Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Games Based Learning (pp. 227–236). Barcelona, Spain: Academic Publishing.(2009).
Serious games and social change: Why they (should) work . In U. RitterfeldM. CodyP. VordererEds., Serious games: Mechanisms and effects (pp. 248–270). New York, NY: Routledge.(2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
(2014, December). How I became homeless. Retrieved from http://www.salon.com/2014/12/25/how_i_became_homeless
(2009). The power of narratives: The effect of entertainment television organ donation storylines on the attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors of donors and nondonors. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 135–151.
(2015). Laughing and crying: Mixed emotions, compassion, and the effectiveness of a YouTube PSA about skin cancer. Health Communication, 30(8), 820–829.
(2010). Appreciation as audience response: Exploring entertainment gratifications beyond hedonism. Human Communication Research, 36(1), 53–81.
(2015). Video games as meaningful entertainment experiences. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1–16. doi: 10.1037/ppm0000066. Advance online publication
(2010). The effects of a serious game on role-taking and willingness to help. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 723–742.
. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software manual]. Vienna, Austria: Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
(2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. Retrieved from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/
(2015). The effect of a persuasive social impact game on affective learning and attitude. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 213–221.
(2015). Games you can’t win. The Computer Games Journal, 4(3–4), 169–186.
(2008). Friends of victims: Personal experience and prosocial behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 532–542.
(2015). Increasing donating behavior through a game for change: The role of interactivity and appreciation. Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. New York, NY: ACM, 319–329.
(2009).
Media effects 2.0: Social and psychological effects of communication technologies . In R. L. NabiM. B. OlivesEds., The Sage handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 545–560). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.(2014). The social contagion of generosity. PloS one, 9(2).
(2001). Does entertainment suffer from interactivity? the impact of watching an interactive TV movie on viewers’ experience of entertainment. Media Psychology, 3(4), 343–363.
(2012).
Interactive stories and motivation to read in the raft dyslexia fluency tutor . In Y. NakanoM. NeffA. PaivaM. WalkerEds., International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (pp. 260–267). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
