References
2016). Communication descending. International Communication Gazette, 78(7), 612–620. doi: 10.1177/1748048516655708
(2013). Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(5), 365–376. doi: 10.1038/nrn3475
(2017). “Drive the lane; together, hard!” An examination of the effects of supportive co-playing, and task difficulty on prosocial behavior. Journal of Media Psychology, 29, 31–41. doi: 10.1027/1864-1105/a000209
(2016). The GRIM Test: A simple technique detects numerous anomalies in the reporting of results in psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science. doi: 10.1177/1948550616673876
(2016). pwr: Basic functions for power analysis. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/package=pwr
(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(2016). Media and young minds. Pediatrics, 138(5), e20162591. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2591
(2015). Technology and human behavior: A preregistered special issue of the Journal of Media Psychology. Journal of Media Psychology, 27(4), 203–204. doi: 10.1027/1864-1105/a000170
(2015). statcheck: Extract statistics from articles and recompute p values. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/package=statcheck
(2014). The N-pact factor: Evaluating the quality of empirical journals with respect to sample size and statistical power. PLoS One, 9(10), e109019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109019
(2016). OpenTrials: Towards a collaborative open database of all available information on all clinical trials. Trials, 17(1), 164. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1290-8
(2017). Video game use as risk exposure, protective incapacitation, or inconsequential activity among university students: Comparing approaches in a unique risk environment. Journal of Media Psychology, 29, 42–53. doi: 10.1027/1864-1105/a000210
(2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), e1002456. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456
(2014). Observed power, and what to do if your editor asks for post-hoc power analyses. The 20% Statistician. Retrieved from http://daniellakens.blogspot.de/2014/12/observed-power-and-what-to-do-if-your.html
(2015). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behavior Research Methods. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0664-2
(2012). Is the replicability crisis overblown? Three arguments examined. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 531–536. doi: 10.1177/1745691612463401
(2016). How we see electronic games. PeerJ, 4, e1931. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1931
(2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org
. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7(4), 331–363. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331
(2016). waffle: Create waffle chart visualizations in R.
(2012). The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles. Psychological Methods, 17(4), 551–566. doi: 10.1037/a0029487
(2017). The impact of immersive technology on nature relatedness and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Media Psychology, 29, 8–17. doi: 10.1027/1864-1105/a000213
(2017). Interactive narratives affecting social change: A closer look at the relationship between interactivity and prosocial behavior. Journal of Media Psychology, 29, 54–66. doi: 10.1027/1864-1105/a000211
(2017). Effects of subtitles, complexity, and language proficiency on learning from online education videos. Journal of Media Psychology, 29, 18–30. doi: 10.1027/1864-1105/a000208
(2015). Blinded by the light: How a focus on statistical “significance” may cause p-value misreporting and an excess of p-values just below .05 in communication science. Communication Methods and Measures, 9(4), 253–279. doi: 10.1080/19312458.2015.1096333
(2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. doi: 10.1177/1745691612463078
(2006). The poor availability of psychological research data for reanalysis. American Psychologist, 61(7), 726–728. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.726
(