Skip to main content
Research Report

Does Elevation Reduce Viewers’ Enjoyment of Media Violence?

Testing the Intervention Potential of Inspiring Media

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000214

Abstract. Media violence is often accompanied by moral disengagement cues that allow viewers to minimize the moral concerns that violence in real life typically evokes. What happens, however, when preceding media activate viewers’ moral emotions? Can the affective states associated with elevation decrease subsequent enjoyment of media violence? The current study examined these questions with a one-factor, between-subjects experiment that tested how prior exposure to eudaimonic media affects viewers’ violence enjoyment and prosocial attitudes. Feelings of meaningful affect elicited by eudaimonic media decreased viewers’ enjoyment of violent media and increased prosocial attitudes. Evidence for a boomerang effect through mixed affect and transportation was also found. The implications of these findings for media violence interventions and theory on enjoyment are discussed.

References

  • Bailey, E. & Wojdynski, B. W. (2015). Effects of “meaningful” entertainment on altruistic behavior: Investigating potential mediators. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(4), 603–619. doi: 10.1080/08838151.2015.1093484 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bentler, P. & Chou, C. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods and Research, 16(1), 78–117. doi: 10.1177/0049124187016001004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cantor, J. & Wilson, B. J. (2003). Media and violence: Intervention strategies for reducing aggression. Media Psychology, 5(4), 363–403. doi: 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0504_03 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dill, J. C. & Anderson, C. A. (1995). Effects of frustration justification on hostile aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 21, 359–369. doi: 10.1002/1098-2337(1995)21:5<359::AID-AB2480210505>3.0.CO;2-6 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Green, M. C., Brock, T. C. & Kaufman, G. F. (2004). Understanding media enjoyment: The role of transportation into narrative worlds. Communication Theory, 14(4), 311–327. doi: 10.1093/ct/14.4.311 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Haidt, J. (2000). The positive emotion of elevation. Prevention and Treatment, 3(1), 1–5. doi: 10.1037/1522-3736.3.1.33c First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hartmann, T., Krakowiak, K. M. & Tsay-Vogel, M. (2014). How violent video games communicate violence: A literature review and content analysis of moral disengagement factors. Communication Monographs, 81(3), 310–332. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2014.922206 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krakowiak, K. M. & Oliver, M. B. (2012). When good characters do bad things: Examining the effect of moral ambiguity on enjoyment. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 117–135. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01618.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Krämer, N., Eimler, S. C., Neubaum, G., Winter, S., Rösner, L. & Oliver, M. B. (2016). Broadcasting one world: How watching online videos can elicit elevation and reduce stereotypes. New Media and Society, Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1461444816639963 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oliver, M. B. (2003). Mood management and selective exposure. In J. BryantD. Roskos-EwoldsenJ. CantorEds., Communication and emotion: Essays in honor of Dolf Zillman (pp. 85–106). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Oliver, M. B. (2008). Tender affective states as predictors of entertainment preference. Journal of Communication, 58, 40–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00373.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oliver, M. B., Hartmann, T. & Woolley, J. K. (2012). Elevation in response to entertainment portrayals of moral virtue. Human Communication Research, 38, 360–378. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01427.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Oliver, M. B. & Raney, A. A. (2011). Entertainment as pleasurable and meaningful: Identifying hedonic and eudaimonic motivations for entertainment consumption. Journal of Communication, 61(5), 984–1004. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01585.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schnall, S. & Roper, J. (2012). Elevation puts moral values into action. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(3), 373–378. doi: 10.1177/1948550611423595 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shrum, L. J., Lee, J., Burroughs, J. E. & Rindfleisch, A. (2011). An online process model of second-order cultivation effects: How television cultivates materialism and its consequences for life satisfaction. Human Communication Research, 37, 34–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01392.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tsay-Vogel, M. & Krakowiak, K. M. (2016). Effects of hedonic and eudaimonic motivations on film enjoyment through moral disengagement. Communication Research Reports, 33(1), 54–60. doi: 10.1080/08824096.2015.1117443 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wissmath, B., Weibel, D. & Groner, R. (2009). Dubbing or subtitling: Effects on spatial presence, transportation, flow, and enjoyment. Journal of Media Psychology, 21, 114–125. doi: 10.1027/1864-1105.21.3.114 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Zillmann, D. (1988). Mood management: Using entertainment to full advantage. In L. DonohewH. E. SypherE. T. HigginsEds., Communication, social cognition, and affect (pp. 147–171). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar