Skip to main content
Original Article

Effects of Human vs. Computer-Controlled Characters and Social Identity Cues on Enjoyment

Mediation Effects of Presence, Similarity, and Group Identification

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000218

Abstract. This study explored how group identification, avatar similarity identification, and social presence mediated the effect of character type (avatars or agents) and social identity cues (presence or absence of avatars wearing participants’ school colors) on game enjoyment. Playing with teammate avatars increased enjoyment indirectly by enhancing group identification. In addition, the presence of social identity cues increased enjoyment indirectly by augmenting identification with one’s avatar. Unexpectedly, playing in multiplayer mode in the presence of social identity cues decreased enjoyment, whereas playing in multiplayer mode in the absence of social identity cues increased enjoyment. Social presence was not a reliable mediator. The findings supported media enjoyment and social identity theories, and highlighted how virtual character type and identification processes influence enjoyment.

References

  • Bargh, J. A. & Chartrand, T. L. (2000). The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In H. T. ReisC. M. JuddEds., Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 253–285). New York: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cialdini, R. B., Borden, R. J., Thorne, A., Walker, M. R., Freeman, S. & Sloan, L. R. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 366–375. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.34.3.366 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cyr, D., Hassanein, K., Head, M. & Ivanov, A. (2007). The role of social presence in establishing loyalty in e-Service environments. Interacting with Computers, 19, 43–56. doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2006.07.010 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eveleth, D. M. & Eveleth, A. B. (2010). Team identification, team performance and leader-member exchange relationships in virtual groups: Findings from massive multi-player online role play games. International Journal of Virtual Communities and Social Networking, 2, 52–66. doi: 10.4018/jvcsn.2010010104 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Guadagno, R. E., Blascovich, J., Bailenson, J. N. & McCall, C. (2007). Virtual humans and persuasion: The effects of agency and behavioral realism. Media Psychology, 10(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1080/15213260701300865 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Guegan, J., Moliner, P. & Buisine, S. (2015). Why are online games so self‐involving: A social identity analysis of massively multiplayer online role‐playing games. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 349–355. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2103 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Harms, C. & Biocca, F. (2004). Internal consistency and reliability of the networked minds social presence measure. In M. AlcanizB. ReyEds., Seventh annual international workshop: Presence (pp. 191–218). Valencia: Universidad Politécnica de Valencia. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Heeter, C. (1995). Communication research on consumer VR. In F. BioccaM. R. LevyEds., Communication in the age of virtual reality. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hartmann, T. & Klimmt, C. (2006). Gender and computer games: Exploring females’ dislikes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 910–931. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00301.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Johnson, D., Wyeth, P., Clark, M. & Watling, C. (2015, April). Cooperative game play with avatars and agents: Differences in brain activity and the experience of play. CHI ‘15 Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3721–3730). New York. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klimmt, C. & Hartmann, T. (2008). Mediated interpersonal communication in multiplayer videogames: Implications for entertainment and relationship management. In E. A. KonijnM. TanisS. UtzS. B. BarnesEds., Mediated interpersonal communication (pp. 309–330). London: Routledge. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A. & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Klimmt, C., Hefner, D. & Vorderer, P. (2009). The video game experience as “true” identification: A theory of enjoyable alterations of players’ self-perception. Communication Theory, 19, 351–373. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2009.01347.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lea, M. & Spears, R. (1992). Paralanguage and social perception in computer‐mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 2, 321–341. doi: 10.1080/10919399209540190 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14, 27–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00302.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lin, A., Gregor, S. & Ewing, M. (2008). Developing a scale to measure the enjoyment of Web experiences. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 22, 40–57. doi: 10.1002/dir.20120 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lim, S. & Reeves, B. (2009). Computer agents versus avatars: Responses to interactive game characters controlled by a computer or other player. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68, 57–68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.09.008 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lombard, M. & Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3. [Advance online publication]. doi: 10.1111/j.1083–6101.1997.tb00072.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marques, J. M. & Paez, D. (1994). The “black sheep effect”: Social categorization, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability. In W. StroebeM. HewstoneEds., European review of social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 37–68). Chichester, UK: Wiley. doi: 10.1080/14792779543000011 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McGee, K., Merritt, T. & Ong, C. (2013). Understanding differences in enjoyment: Playing games with human or AI team-mates. In Y. G. JiEd., Advances in affective and pleasurable design (pp. 446–451). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ratan, R. A., Chung, J. E., Shen, C., Williams, D. & Poole, M. S. (2010). Schmoozing and smiting: Trust, social institutions, and communication patterns in an MMOG. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16, 93–114. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01534.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ravaja, N., Saari, T., Turpeinen, M., Laarni, J., Salminen, M. & Kivikangas, M. (2006). Spatial presence and emotions during video game playing: Does it matter with whom you play? Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 15, 381–392. doi: 10.1162/pres.15.4.381 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sassenberg, K. (2002). Common bond and common identity groups on the Internet: Attachment and normative behavior in on-topic and off-topic chats. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 27–37. doi: 10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.27 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmierbach, M., Xu, Q., Oeldorf-Hirsch, A. & Dardis, F. E. (2012). Electronic friend or virtual foe: Exploring the role of competitive and cooperative multiplayer video game modes in fostering enjoyment. Media Psychology, 15, 356–371. doi: 10.1080/15213269.2012.702603 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spears, R. & Lea, M. (1994). Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 21, 427–459. doi: 10.1177/009365094021004001 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spears, R. & Postmes, T. (2015). Group identity, social influence, and collective action online: Extensions and applications of the SIDE model. In S. S. SundarEd., The handbook of psychology and communication technology (pp. 23–46). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. WorchelW. AustinEds., The psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tamborini, R., Bowman, N. D., Eden, A., Grizzard, M. & Organ, A. (2010). Defining media enjoyment as the satisfaction of intrinsic needs. Journal of Communication, 60, 758–777. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01513.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tanis, M. & Postmes, T. (2007). Two faces of anonymity: Paradoxical effects of cues to identity in CMC. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 955–970. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2005.08.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D. & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. New York: Basil Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Van Looy, J., Courtois, C., De Vocht, M. & De Marez, L. (2012). Player identification in online games: Validation of a scale for measuring identification in MMOGs. Media Psychology, 15, 197–221. doi: 10.1080/15213269.2012.674917 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T. & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: Quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504–535. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vorderer, P., Klimmt, C. & Ritterfeld, U. (2004). Enjoyment: At the heart of media entertainment. Communication Theory, 14, 388–408. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00321.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wang, Z., Walther, J. B. & Hancock, J. T. (2009). Social identification and interpersonal communication in computer-mediated communication: What you do versus who you are in virtual groups. Human Communication Research, 35, 59–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.01338.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weibel, D., Wissmath, B., Habegger, S., Steiner, Y. & Groner, R. (2008). Playing online games against computer- vs. human-controlled opponents: Effects on presence, flow, and enjoyment. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 2274–2291. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.11.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yilmaz, G. & Peña, J. (2014). The influence of social categories and interpersonal behaviors on future intentions and attitudes to form subgroups in virtual teams. Communication Research, 41, 333–352. doi: 10.1177/0093650212443696 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar