Abstract
Why do people use spatial language to describe social relationships? In particular, to what extent do they anchor their thoughts about friendship in terms of space? Three experiments used drawing and estimation tasks to further explore the conceptual structure of social distance using friendship as a manipulation. In all three experiments, participants read short narratives and then drew what they imagined happened during the narrative and estimated passing time. Overall, the results of these exploratory studies suggest that the conceptual structure of friendship is linked to thought about space in terms of path drawing. Results are discussed in light of social distance and intercharacter interaction.
References
(1997). Social distance and social decisions. Econometrica, 65, 1005–1027.
(2007). Automatic processing of psychological distance: Evidence from a Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 610–622.
(1933). A social distance scale. Sociology and Social Research, 17, 265–271.
(2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75, 1–28.
(1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In , Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press.
(1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.
(1997). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 351–367.
(2001). Spatial metaphors in temporal reasoning. In , Spatial schemas in abstract thought (pp. 203–222). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
(1994). The poetics of the mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
(1966). The hidden dimension. New York: Doubleday.
(1995). Social distance evaluations in white and African-American students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 80, 478.
(2004). Social attitudes predict biases in geographic knowledge. The Professional Geographer, 26, 258–269.
(1995). American friendship and the scope of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics, 6, 315–346.
(1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
(1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
(2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.
(2002). Social distance and trait attribution among four Southeast Asian ethnic groups in the United States. Psychological Reports, 91, 326–330.
(2002). The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 523–534.
(1999). The conceptual structure of information space. In , Social navigation of information space (pp. 155–173). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
(2005). The experiential link between spatial and temporal language. Cognitive Science, 29, 655–664.
(2005). Even the most abstract motion influences temporal understanding. In , Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 2527). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2007). How spatial is social distance? In , Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 1813). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
(2008). Effects of social information on distance estimation. In , Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 2028). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
(2008). Construal level and procrastination. Psychological Science, 19, 1308–1314.
(1998). Back (or forward?) to the future: The role of perspective in temporal language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1211–1223.
(2006). Time after time: The psychological reality of the ego- and time reference-point distinction in metaphorical construals of time. Metaphor and Symbol, 21, 133–146.
(1997). The language and politics of exclusion: Others in discourse. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
(1976). Social distance as a factor in second language acquisition. Language learning, 26, 135–143.
(2001). Communication accommodation theory. In , The new handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 33–56). New York: Wiley.
(2010). Politeness and psychological distance: A construal level perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 268–280.
(2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440–463.
(2008). Representations of the self in the near and distant future. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 757–773.
