Skip to main content
Original Article

Are Liberals Agreeable or Not?

Politeness and Compassion Differentially Predict Political Conservatism Via Distinct Ideologies

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000132

Documenting the relationship between Agreeableness and political conservatism has proven elusive. We address this anomaly by showing that two aspects of Agreeableness – politeness and compassion – have countervailing relationships with political conservatism through right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO). To test this, we analyzed data from a nationally representative sample of New Zealanders (N = 4,553). Politeness was positively, but compassion was negatively, correlated with political conservatism. Consistent with the differential mediation hypothesis derived from the dual process model of ideology and prejudice, these opposing relationships were differentially mediated by RWA and SDO. This attenuated the bivariate relationship between the higher-order trait of Agreeableness and political conservatism. These results demonstrate the complex relationship between personality and political orientation.

References

  • Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Block, J. , Block, J. H. (2006). Nursery school personality and political orientation two decades later. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 734–749. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Caprara, G. V. , Barbaranelli, C. , Zimbardo, P. G. (1999). Personality profiles and political parties. Political Psychology, 20, 175–197. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Caprara, G. V. , Vecchione, M. , Schwartz, S. H. (2009). Mediational role of values in linking personality traits to political orientation. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 82–94. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carney, D. R. , Jost, J. T. , Gosling, S. D. , Potter, J. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29, 807–840. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P. T., Jr. , McCrae, R. R. (1988). From catalog to classification: Murray’s needs and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 258–265. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • DeYoung, C. G. , Quilty, L. C. , Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880–896. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In M. P. Zanna, (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41–113). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Duckitt, J. , Sibley, C. G. (2007). Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21, 113–130. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Duckitt, J. , Sibley, C. G. (2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78, 1861–1894. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gosling, S. D. , Rentfrow, P. J. , Swann, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hirsh, J. B. , DeYoung, C. G. , Xu, X. , Peterson, J. B. (2010). Compassionate liberals and polite conservatives: Associations of agreeableness with political ideology and moral values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 655–664. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L.-T. , Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6, 1–55. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • John, O. P. , Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin, O. P. John, (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jost, J. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61, 651–670. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jost, J. T. , Federico, C. M. , Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jost, J. T. , Glaser, J. , Kruglanski, A. W. , Sulloway, F. J. (2003a). Exceptions that prove the rule – Using a theory of motivated social cognition to account for ideological incongruities and political anomalies: Reply to Greenberg and Jonas (2003). Psychological Bulletin, 129, 383–393. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jost, J. T. , Glaser, J. , Kruglanski, A. W. , Sulloway, F. J. (2003b). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kossowska, M. , & van Hiel, A. (1999). Personality and current political beliefs: A comparative study of Polish and Belgian samples. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 30, 115–128. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McCrae, R. R. , & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pratto, F. , Sidanius, J. , Stallworth, L. M. , Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sibley, C. G. , & Duckitt, J. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248–279. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sibley, C. G. , & Duckitt, J. (2012). Personality geneses of authoritarianism: The form and function of Openness to Experience. In F. Funke, T. Petzel, J. C. Cohrs, J. Duckitt, (Eds.), Perspectives on authoritarianism (pp. 169–199). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS-Verlag. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sibley, C. G. , Harding, J. F. , Perry, R. , Asbrock, F. , & Duckitt, J. (2010). Personality and prejudice: Extension to the HEXACO personality model. European Journal of Personality, 24, 515–534. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sibley, C. G. , & Liu, J. H. (2010). Social dominance orientation: Testing a global individual difference perspective. Political Psychology, 31, 175–207. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sibley, C. G. , Osborne, D. , Duckitt, J. (in press). Personality and political orientation: Meta-analysis and test of threat-constraint model. Journal of Research in Personality. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Sidanius, J. , Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van Hiel, A. , Mervielde, I. , de Fruyt, F. (2004). The relationship between maladaptive personality and right wing ideology. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 405–417. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Verhulst, B. , Eaves, L. J. , Hatemi, P. K. (2012). Correlation not causation: The relationship between personality traits and political ideologies. American Journal of Political Science, 56, 34–51. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wilson, M. S. , & Sibley, C. G. (in press). Social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism: Additive and interactive effects on political conservatism. Political Psychology. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar