Are Liberals Agreeable or Not?
Politeness and Compassion Differentially Predict Political Conservatism Via Distinct Ideologies
Abstract
Documenting the relationship between Agreeableness and political conservatism has proven elusive. We address this anomaly by showing that two aspects of Agreeableness – politeness and compassion – have countervailing relationships with political conservatism through right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO). To test this, we analyzed data from a nationally representative sample of New Zealanders (N = 4,553). Politeness was positively, but compassion was negatively, correlated with political conservatism. Consistent with the differential mediation hypothesis derived from the dual process model of ideology and prejudice, these opposing relationships were differentially mediated by RWA and SDO. This attenuated the bivariate relationship between the higher-order trait of Agreeableness and political conservatism. These results demonstrate the complex relationship between personality and political orientation.
References
1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
(2006). Nursery school personality and political orientation two decades later. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 734–749.
(1999). Personality profiles and political parties. Political Psychology, 20, 175–197.
(2009). Mediational role of values in linking personality traits to political orientation. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 82–94.
(2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives: Personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29, 807–840.
(1988). From catalog to classification: Murray’s needs and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 258–265.
(2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880–896.
(2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In , Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41–113). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
(2007). Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21, 113–130.
(2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78, 1861–1894.
(2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528.
(2010). Compassionate liberals and polite conservatives: Associations of agreeableness with political ideology and moral values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 655–664.
(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6, 1–55.
(1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In , Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford.
(2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61, 651–670.
(2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337.
(2003a). Exceptions that prove the rule – Using a theory of motivated social cognition to account for ideological incongruities and political anomalies: Reply to Greenberg and Jonas (2003). Psychological Bulletin, 129, 383–393.
(2003b). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.
(1999). Personality and current political beliefs: A comparative study of Polish and Belgian samples. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 30, 115–128.
(1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.
(1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.
(2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248–279.
(2012). Personality geneses of authoritarianism: The form and function of Openness to Experience. In , Perspectives on authoritarianism (pp. 169–199). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS-Verlag.
(2010). Personality and prejudice: Extension to the HEXACO personality model. European Journal of Personality, 24, 515–534.
(2010). Social dominance orientation: Testing a global individual difference perspective. Political Psychology, 31, 175–207.
(in press ). Personality and political orientation: Meta-analysis and test of threat-constraint model. Journal of Research in Personality.1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
(2004). The relationship between maladaptive personality and right wing ideology. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 405–417.
(2012). Correlation not causation: The relationship between personality traits and political ideologies. American Journal of Political Science, 56, 34–51.
(in press ). Social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism: Additive and interactive effects on political conservatism. Political Psychology.