Skip to main content
Original Article

Effects of Power on Social Perception

All Your Boss Can See is Agency

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000139

Three studies explored the relationship between power and the perception of others in terms of agency and communion. In Study 1, participants taking a manager perspective were more interested in the agency of their future employee than those asked to take a subordinate perspective were in the agency of their future employer. Moreover, they showed more interest in the agency than in the communion of their future employee. Study 2 extended these findings to perceptions of others unrelated to the context of work. In Study 3, participants taking the manager perspective favored agency traits in their employee more than those taking the subordinate perspective favored agency in their employer. This effect was mediated by an increased task orientation among those in positions of greater relative power. Using two manipulations and three dependent measures, power was found to enhance the focus on the agency dimension across the three studies, mediated by increases in orientation to tasks versus relationships.

References

  • Abele, A. E. , Bruckmüller, S. (2011). The bigger one of the “Big Two”? Preferential processing of communal information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 935–948. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Abele, A. E. , Uchronski, M. , Suitner, C. , Wojciszke, B. (2008). Toward an operationalization of the fundamental dimensions of agency and communion: Trait content ratings in five countries considering valence and frequency of word occurrence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1202–1217. doi 10.1002/ejsp.575 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Abele, A. E. , Wojciszke, B. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751–763. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.93. 5.751 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Anderson, C. , Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511–536. doi 10.1002/ejsp.324 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. doi 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carver, C. S. , & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fast, N. J. , Gruenfeld, D. H. , Sivanathan, N. , Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Illusory control. A generative force behind power’s far-reaching effects. Psychological Science, 20, 502–508. doi 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02311.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621–628. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fiske, S. T. , Cuddy, A. J. C. , Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11, 77–83. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fitzsimons, G. M. , & Shah, J. Y. (2008). How goal instrumentality shapes relationship evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 319–337. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.95.2.319 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • French, J. R. P. , & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright, (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Galinsky, A. D. , Gruenfeld, D. H. , Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453–466. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Galinsky, A. D. , Magee, J. C. , Inesi, M. E. , Gruenfeld, D. H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17, 1068–1074. doi 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01824.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Georgesen, J. C. , & Harris, M. J. (1998). Why’s my boss always holding me down? A meta-analysis of power effects on performance evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 184–195. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goodwin, S. A. , Gubin, A. , Fiske, S. T. , Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2000). Power can bias impression processes: Stereotyping subordinates by default and by design. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 3, 227–256. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gruenfeld, D. H. , Inesi, M. E. , Magee, J. C. , Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Power and the objectification of social targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 111–127. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.111 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Judd, C. , James-Hawkins, L. , Yzerbyt, V. Y. , Kashima, Y. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899–913. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Keltner, D. J. , Gruenfeld, D. H. , Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284. doi 10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.265 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kipnis, D. , Castell, P. J. , Gergen, M. , Mauch, D. (1976). Metamorphic effects of power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 127–135. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacKinnon, D. P. , Lockwood, C. M. , Hoffman, J. M. , West, S. G. , Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variables effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Magee, J. C. , Galinsky, A. D. , Gruenfeld, D. H. (2007). Power, propensity to negotiate, and moving first in competitive interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 200–212. doi 10.1177/0146167206294413 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Overbeck, J. R. , & Park, B. (2001). When power does not corrupt: Superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 549–565. doi 10.1037//0022-3514.81.4.549 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Peeters, G. (1992). Evaluative meanings of adjectives in vitro and in context: Some theoretical implications and practical consequences of positive negative asymmetry and behavioral-adaptive concepts of evaluation. Psychologia Belgica, 32, 211–231. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Preacher, K. J. , & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717–731. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Preacher, K. J. , Zyphur, M. J. , Zhang, Z. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15, 209–233. doi 10.1037/a0020141 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, P. K. , Bargh, J. A. (2008). Nonconscious effects of power on basic approach and avoidance tendencies. Social Cognition, 26, 1–24. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, P. K. , Jostmann, N. B. , Galinsky, A. D. , van Dijk, W. W. (2008). Lacking power impairs executive functions. Psychological Science, 19, 441–447. doi 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02107.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, P. K. , Trope, Y. (2006). You focus on the forest when you’re in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 578–596. doi 10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.578 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180. doi 10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Winter, L. , Uleman, J. S. (1984). When are social judgments made? Evidence for the spontaneousness of trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 237–252. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Winter, L. , Uleman, J. S. , Cunniff, C. (1985). How automatic are social judgments? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 904–917. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wojciszke, B. (1994). Multiple meanings of behavior: Construing actions in terms of competence or morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 222–232. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wojciszke, B. (2010). Sprawczoś i wspólnotowoś. Podstawowe wymiary spostrzegania spojecznego [Agency and Communion. The primary dimensions of social perceptions]. Sopot: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wojciszke, B. , & Abele, A. E. (2008). The primacy of communion over agency and its reversals in evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1139–1147. doi 10.1002/ejsp.549 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wojciszke, B. , Baryla, W. , Parzuchowski, M. , Szymkow-Sudziarska, A. , Abele, A. E. (in press). Self-esteem is dominated by agentic over communal information. European Journal of Social Psychology. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wojciszke, B. , & Struzynska-Kujalowicz, A. (2007). Power influences self-esteem. Social Cognition, 25, 510–532. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar