Cognitive Components of Ingroup Projection
Prototype Projection Contributes to Biased Prototypicality Judgments in Group Perception
Abstract
This research investigated whether relative ingroup prototypicality (i.e., the tendency to perceive one’s own ingroup as more prototypical of a superordinate category than the outgroup) can result from a prototype-based versus exemplar-based mental representation of social categories, rather than from ingroup membership per se as previously suggested by the ingroup projection model. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that a prototype-based group was perceived as more prototypical of a superordinate category than an exemplar-based group supporting the hypothesis that an intergroup context is not necessary for biased prototypicality judgments. Experiment 3 introduced an intergroup context in a minimal-group-like paradigm. The findings demonstrated that both the kind of cognitive representation and motivational processes contribute to biased prototypicality judgments in intergroup settings.
References
2009). Like me or like us: Is ingroup projection just social projection? Experimental Psychology, 56, 198–205.
(2010). What do you mean by “European”? Evidence of spontaneous ingroup projection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 960–974.
(1996). Seeing groups as entities: The role of perceiver motivation. In , The handbook of motivation and cognition, Vol.3: The interpersonal context (pp. 347–370). New York: Guilford.
(2004). Knowledge, expectations, and inductive reasoning within conceptual hierarchies. Cognition, 90, 217–253.
(2005). American = white? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 447–466.
(1992). The role of diagnosticity in stereotype formation: Perceiving group means and variance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 356–367.
(1995). Social categorization and group homogeneity: Changes in perceived applicability of stereotype content as a function of comparative context and trait favorableness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 139–160.
(2011). Facing Europe: Visualizing spontaneous ingroup projection. Psychological Science, 22, 1583–1590.
(1993). Intergroup attributions and affective consequences in majority and minority group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 936–950.
(1992). Use of exemplars and abstractions in trait judgment: A model of trait knowledge about the self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 739–753.
(1989). Language use in intergroup contexts: The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 981–993.
(2009). Ingroup projection as a means to define the superordinate category efficiently: Response time evidence. Social Cognition, 27, 57–75.
(2012 ). The two routes to relative ingroup prototypicality: Heuristic and motivated ingroup projection. Manuscript currently under revision.2009). On the crucial role of mental ingroup representation for ingroup bias and the ingroup prototypicality-ingroup bias link. Experimental Psychology, 56, 156–164.
(1994). Stereotypes as energy-saving devices: A peek inside the cognitive toolbox. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 37–47.
(1997). Similar and different: The differentiation of basic-level categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 54–70.
(1990). Designing experiments and analyzing data. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
(1984). Given versus induced category representation: Use of prototype and exemplar information in classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 333–352.
(1991). Group composition, salience, and cognitive representations: The phenomenology of being in a group. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 297–323.
(1993). Cognitive representation in ethnophaulisms as a function of group size: The phenomenology of being in a group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 296–304.
(1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 158–174.
(2000). Evidence for implicit evaluative ingroup bias: Affect-biased spontaneous trait inference in a minimal group paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 77–89.
(1987). Perception of variability in category development: Instance- versus abstraction-based stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 621–635.
(1979). The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport’s cognitive analysis of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 461–476.
(2012). Efficiency and defense motivated ingroup projection: Sources of prototypicality in intergroup relations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 669–681.
(1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382–439.
(2012). Current problems and resolutions: Group status is related to group prototypicality in the absence of social identity concerns. Journal of Social Psychology, 152, 386–389.
(1996). Development and mental representation of stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1126–1141.
(1998). Intergroup bias in group judgment processes: The role of behavioral memories. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 51–65.
(2000). Attention and stereotyping: Cognitive constraints on the construction of meaningful social impressions. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 145–175.
(1990). Exemplar and prototype use in social categorization. Social Cognition, 8, 243–262.
(1992). Exemplar-based model of social judgment. Psychological Review, 99, 3–21.
(1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In , The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brookes/Cole.
(2007). Effect sizes and F ratios < 1.0. Sense or nonsense? Methodology, 3, 35–46.
(2004). Inclusion in a superordinate category, ingroup prototypicality, and attitudes toward outgroups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 466–477.
(2005). When “different” means “worse”: Ingroup prototypicality in changing intergroup contexts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 76–83.
(2004). Of bikers, teachers and Germans: Groups’ diverging views about their prototypicality. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 385–400.
(2003). Toward tolerance: Representations of superordinate categories and perceived ingroup prototypicality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 31–47.
(2007). Superordinate identities and intergroup conflict: The ingroup projection model. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 331–372.
(2003). The ingroup as pars pro toto: Projection from the ingroup onto the inclusive category as a precursor to social discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 461–473.
(