Recognition and Approach Responses Toward Threatening Objects
Abstract
Previous research suggests that positive stimuli are often approached as well as recognized faster than negative stimuli. We argue that this effect does not hold if negative stimuli are associated with threat. Based on fear module theory (Öhman & Mineka, 2001, 2003), we argue that individuals recognize threatening stimuli faster than positive stimuli because of a constant monitoring of the environment for threatening objects. Moreover, based on the assumption of a motivational account underlying approach-avoidance responses (Krieglmeyer & Deutsch, 2010), we assume the recognition then directly evokes a careful and slow approach of threatening objects. Applying a response time task that measures approach movement and recognition times within the same task, we found that individuals recognize threatening pictures faster than positive pictures, but approach the threatening pictures slower than the positive pictures.
References
(1994). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning. In , Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 303–348). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
(2008). Predispositions to approach and avoid are contextually sensitive and goal dependent. Emotion, 8, 174–183.
(1992). The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 893–912.
(2006). Snakes, spiders, guns, and syringes: How specific are evolutionary constraints on the detection of threatening stimuli? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1484–1504.
(2005). Indirectly measuring evaluations of several attitude objects in relation to a neutral reference point. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 346–368.
(2005). The role of fear-relevant stimuli in visual search: A comparison of phylogenetic and ontogenetic stimuli. Emotion, 5, 360–364.
(1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 215–224.
(2001). On the generality of the affective Simon effect. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 189–206.
(2008). When do motor behaviors (mis)match affective stimuli? An evaluative coding view of approach and avoidance reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 262–281.
(2006). Unresolved problems with the “I,” the “A,” and the “T”: A logical and psychometric critique of the Implicit Association Test (IAT). European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 74–147.
(1996). Gender and age differences in the prevalence of specific fears and phobias. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 33–39.
(2013). Reaching for the (product) stars: Measuring recognition and approach speed to get insights into consumer choice. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35, 298–315.
(2010). Comparing measures of approach-avoidance behaviour: The manikin task vs. two versions of the joystick task. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 810–828.
(2007). Affect and action: Towards an event-coding account. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 1270–1296.
(2007). When danger lurks in the background: Attentional capture by animal fear-relevant distractors is specific and selectively enhanced by animal fear. Emotion, 7, 192–200.
(2008). Detecting the snake in the grass attention to fear-relevant stimuli by adults and young children. Psychological Science, 19, 284–289.
(2010). Superior detection of threat-relevant stimuli in infancy. Developmental Science, 13, 221–228.
(2002). Phobias and preparedness: The selective, automatic, and encapsulated nature of fear. Biological Psychiatry, 52, 927–937.
(1996). Lateralization of the approach movement and the prehension movement in infants from 4 to 7 months. Early Development and Parenting, 5, 81–92.
(2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 184–211.
(2001). The go/no-go association task. Social Cognition, 19, 625–666.
(2001). Emotion drives attention: Detecting the snake in the grass. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 466–478.
(2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108, 483–522.
(2003). The malicious serpent snakes as a prototypical stimulus for an evolved module of fear. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 5–9.
(2007). Approach and avoidance in fear of spiders. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 38, 105–120.
(2010). Attentional and behavioural responses of spider fearfuls to virtual spiders. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 1199–1206.
(2004). Underlying processes in the implicit association test: Dissociating salience from associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 139–165.
(2007). Event-related potentials and recognition memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 251–257.
(2008). Movement direction or change in distance? Self-and object-related approach-avoidance motions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 713–720.
(2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220–247.
(2002). Searching for threat. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 55, 1007–1026.
(2008). Why positive information is processed faster: The density hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 36–49.
(2010). Good things come easy: Subjective exposure frequency and the faster processing of positive information. Social Cognition, 28, 538–555.
(2008). Approach and avoidance as action effects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1298–1306.
(1988). Preparation for grasping an object: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 610–621.
(2008). Recognizing masked threat: Fear betrays, but disgust you can trust. Emotion, 8, 810–819.
(1988). Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
(2000). Intersection of disgust and fear: Normative and pathological views. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 7, 291–311.
(1984). On the primacy of affect. American Psychologist, 39, 117–123.
