Sex Differences in Distress From Infidelity in Early Adulthood and in Later Life
A Replication and Meta-Analysis of Shackelford et al. (2004)
Abstract
Shackelford and colleagues (2004) found that men, compared to women, are more distressed by sexual than emotional infidelity, and this sex difference continued into older age. We conducted four high-powered replications (total N = 1,952) of this effect and found different results. A meta-analysis of original and replication studies finds the sex difference in younger samples (though with a smaller effect size), and no effect among older samples. Furthermore, we found attitude toward uncommitted sex to be a mediator (although not consistently in the same direction) between participant sex and relative distress between sexual and emotional infidelity. We hypothesize that the discrepancies between the original and replication studies may be due to changing cultural attitudes about sex across time. Confirming this speculative interpretation requires further investigation.
References
(2013). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224.
(1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185–216.
(2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.
(1992). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolution, physiology, and psychology. Psychological Science, 3, 251–255.
(1999). Jealousy and the nature of beliefs about infidelity: Tests of competing hypotheses about sex differences in the United States, Korea, and Japan. Personal Relationships, 6, 125–150.
(1996). Sex differences in jealousy and evolutionary and cultural perspective: Tests from the Netherlands, Germany, and the United States. Psychological Science, 7, 359–363.
(1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
(1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 1–11.
(2013). Collaborative Replications and Education Project (CREP). Retrieved from Open Science Framework, osf.io/wfc6u
(2013). Introduction to mediation moderation, and conditional process analyses. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
(2013). Rejoice! In replication. European Journal of Personality, 127, 128–129.
(2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45, 142–152.
(2013). Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods. 1–9. Retrieved from papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2363822
(2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1113.
(2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
(2004). Romantic jealousy in early adulthood and in later life. Human Nature, 15, 283–300.
(2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36, 1–48.
(2012). Using SPSS to obtain a confidence interval for Cohen’s d. Retrieved from core.ecu.edu/psyc/wuenschk/SPSS/CI-d-SPSS.pdf
