Does Recalling Moral Behavior Change the Perception of Brightness?
A Replication and Meta-Analysis of Banerjee, Chatterjee, and Sinha (2012)
Abstract
Banerjee, Chatterjee, and Sinha (2012) recently reported that recalling unethical behavior led participants to see the room as darker and to desire more light-emitting products (e.g., a flashlight) compared to recalling ethical behavior. We replicated the methods of these two original studies with four high-powered replication studies (two online and two in the laboratory). Our results did not differ significantly from zero, 9 out of 10 of the effects were significantly smaller than the originally reported effects, and the effects were not consistently moderated by individual difference measures of potential discrepancies between the original and the replication samples. A meta-analysis that includes both the original and replication effects of moral recall on perceptions of brightness find a small, marginally significant effect (d = 0.14 CL95 −0.002 to 0.28). A meta-analysis that includes both the original and replication effects of moral recall on preferences for light-emitting products finds a small effect that did not differ from zero (d = 0.13 CL95 −0.04 to 0.29).
References
* 2012). Is it light or dark? Recalling moral behavior changes perception of brightness. Psychological Science, 23, 407–409.
(1999). Perceptual symbols system. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.
(* 2013). Replication of Banerjee, Chatterjee, and Sinha (2012). Unpublished replication report and data. https://osf.io/jpfsi/
(2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224.
(2014). Priming, replication, and the hardest science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 40–48.
(2014). “Top-down” effects where none should be found: The El Greco fallacy in perception research. Psychological Science, 25, 38–46.
(1988). The dark side of self-and social perception: Black uniforms and aggression in professional sports. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 74–85.
(2007). Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature, 450, 557–559.
(2010). From perceptual rags to metaphoric riches – Bodily, social, and cultural constraints on sociocognitive metaphors: Comment on Landau, Meier, and Keefer (2010). Psychological Bulletin, 137, 355–361.
(2010). Temperature perceptions as a ground for social proximity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 867–873.
(2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45, 142–152.
(2012). But for the bad, there would not be good: Grounding valence in brightness through shared relational structures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 584–594.
(1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York, NY: Basic Books.
(2012). Bidirectionality, mediation, and moderation of metaphorical effects: The embodiment of social suspicion and fishy smells. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 737–749.
(2009). The color of sin: White and black are perceptual symbols of moral purity and pollution. Psychological Science, 20, 1019–1025.
(2014). Simulating sensorimotor metaphors: Novel metaphors influence embodied cognition. Cognition, 130, 309–314.
(2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36, 1–48.
(2012). Can uniform color color aggression? Quasi-experimental evidence from professional ice hockey. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 274–281.
(2010). Good lamps are the best police: Darkness increases dishonesty and self-interested behavior. Psychological Science, 21, 311–314.
(