Abstract
Abstract. We conducted two studies involving two different age groups (elementary school children and adults) aimed at integrating imagined contact and common ingroup identity models. In the first study, Italian elementary school children were asked to imagine interacting with an unknown immigrant peer as members of a common group. Results revealed that common ingroup imagined contact, relative to a control condition, improved outgroup helping intentions assessed 1 week and 2 weeks after the intervention. In the second study, common ingroup imagined contact led Italian university students to display higher intentions to have contact with immigrants compared to control conditions. In conclusion, results from both studies demonstrate that imagining an intergroup interaction as members of the same group strengthens the effects of imagined contact. These findings point to the importance of combining the common ingroup identity model and the imagined contact theory in order to increase the potentiality of prejudice reduction interventions.
References
(2010). Reasons for skepticism about the efficacy of similated social contact interventions. American Psychologist, 65, 132–133.
(2006). Extended contact through story reading in school: Reducing children’s prejudice toward the disabled. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 469–488.
(2011). “Changing attitudes with a little imagination”: Imagined contact effects on young children’s intergroup bias. Anales de Psicologia, 27, 708–717.
(2013). Can contact improve humanity attributions?. International Journal of Psychology, 48, 527–541.
(2011). Attributional processes underlying imagined contact effects. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 14, 275–287.
(2010). From imagery to intention: A dual-route model of imagined contact effects. European Review of Social Psychology, 21, 188–236.
(2009). Can imagined contact interactions produce positive perceptions? Reducing prejudice through simulated social contact. American Psychologist, 64, 231–240.
(2012).
The imagined contact hypothesis . In J. OlsonM. P. ZannaEds., Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 46 pp. 125–182). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.(1989). Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 239–249.
(2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model, Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
(1994). The contact hypothesis: The role of a common ingroup identity on reducing intergroup bias. Small Group Research, 25, 224–249.
(Eds.). (2012). Lavorare insieme. Imprese cooperative, climi lavorativi e immigrazione
[Working together. Cooperative enterprises, working climates, and immigration] . Milano, Italy: Edizioni Guerini e Associati.(2003). Generalization of positive attitude as a function of subgroup and superordinate group identifications in intergroup contact. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 195–214.
(2010). How should intergroup contact be structured to reduce bias among majority and minority group children?. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 13, 445–460.
(Eds.). (2013). Advances in intergroup contact, New York, NY: Psychology Press.
(2004). Developing a more inclusive social identity: An elementary school intervention. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 35–55.
(2010). Elaboration enhances the imagined contact effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 943–950.
(2011). Enhancing the imagined contact effect. Journal of Social Psychology, 151, 113–116.
(2015). Perspective-taking mediates the imagined contact effect. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 44, 29–34.
(1989). Data analysis: A model comparison approach, San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovic.
(2013). Cooperation makes it happen: Imagined intergroup cooperation enhances the positive effects of imagined contact. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 16, 635–647.
(2009). Ethnic and university identities across the college years: A common in-group identity perspective. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 287–306.
(2013). The group discussion effect: Integrative processes and suggestions for implementation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 56–71.
(2014). A meta-analytic test of the imagined contact hypothesis. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 17, 3–26.
. (2013). Demography in numbers, Retrieved from http://demo.istat.it
(2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–881.
(1999). Effects of directed thinking on intentions to engage in beneficial activities: Actions versus reasons. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 994–1009.
(2010). Does a common identity reduce intergroup threat?. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 13, 403–423.
(2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
(2014). Imagined contact as a prejudice-reduction intervention in schools: The underlying role of similarity and attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44, 536–546.
(2008). Imagining intergroup contact promotes projection to outgroups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 943–957.
(2011). Imagining intergroup contact enables member-to-group generalization. Group Dynamics, 15, 275–284.
(2007). Imagining intergroup contact can improve intergroup attitudes. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 10, 427–441.
(2007). Reducing explicit and implicit outgroup prejudice via direct and extended contact: The mediating role of self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 369–388.
(2012). Behavioural consequences of imagining intergroup contact with stigmatized outgroups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 15, 193–202.
(1987). What do people think they are doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 3–15.
(2012). Feeling like a group after a natural disaster: Common ingroup identity and relations with outgroup victims among majority and minority young children. The British Journal of Social Psychology, in press
Improving explicit and implicit intergroup attitudes using imagined contact: An experimental intervention with elementary school children. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 15, 203–212.
(2012). Increasing outgroup trust, reducing infrahumanization, and enhancing future contact intentions via imagined intergroup contact. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 437–440.
(2015). Imagined intergroup contact facilitates intercultural communication for college students on academic exchange programs. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 18, 66–75.
(2012). Social antecedents of children’s implicit prejudice: Direct contact, extended contact, explicit and implicit teachers’ prejudice. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 569–581.
(2015). The greatest magic of Harry Potter: Reducing prejudice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45, 105–121.
(1975). Evaluations of group products as a function of expectations of group longevity, outcome of competition, and publicity of evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 1089–1097.
