Skip to main content

Adaptation and Validation of a German Multidimensional and Multicomponent Measure of Social Identification

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000243

Abstract. The present article describes a reliable and valid German multidimensional multicomponent measure of social identification. A translation of the original Dutch measure of social identification (Leach et al., 2008) was adapted to the German context and validated in three different samples across three distinct identities using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results of Study 1 (organizational identity, N = 419), Study 2 (national identity, N = 274), and Study 3 (gender identity, N = 833) confirm the psychometric qualities of the German measure and replicate the theoretical multidimensional multicomponent model of social identification including the self-definition (individual self-stereotyping, in-group homogeneity) and self-investment (solidarity, satisfaction, and centrality) dimensions. In addition, Studies 2 and 3 provide evidence for the construct validity of the German subscales of the social identification components.

References

  • Adesokan, A. A., Ullrich, J., van Dick, R. & Tropp, L. R. (2011). Diversity beliefs as moderator of the contact-prejudice relationship. Social Psychology, 42, 271–278. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000058 First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Albert, S., Ashforth, B. E. & Dutton, J. E. (2000). Organizational identity and identification: Charting new waters and building new bridges. Academy of Management Review, 25, 13–17. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2000.2791600 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K. & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 80–114. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.80 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Billig, M. & Tajfel, H. (1973). Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 27–52. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420030103 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Blank, T. (2003). Determinants of national identity in East and West Germany: An empirical comparison of theories on the significance of authoritarianism, anomie, and general self-esteem. Political Psychology, 24, 259–288. doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00328 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brown R. & Gaertner S. (Eds.). (2001). Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes, Malden, MA: Blackwell. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Buckingham, S. A., Frings, D. & Albery, I. P. (2013). Group membership and social identity in addiction recovery. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27, 1132–1140. doi: 10.1037/a0032480 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cameron, J. E. (2004). A three-factor model of social identity. Self and Identity, 3, 239–262. doi: 10.1080/13576500444000047 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Campbell, A. (1971). White attitudes toward black people, Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Demleitner, E. (2010). Gentlemen und Nazis? Nationale Stereotype in deutschen und britischen Printmedien [Gentlemen and Nazis? National stereotypes in German and British print media]. Retrieved from http://www.spr.germanistik.uni-wuerzburg.de/wespa First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eifert, B., Miguel, E. & Posner, D. N. (2010). Political competition and ethnic identification in Africa. American Journal of Political Science, 54, 494–510. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00443.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P. & Ouwerkerk, J. W. (1999). Self-categorisation, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 371–389. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199903/05)29:2/3<371::AID-EJSP932>3.0.CO;2-U First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • FernUniversität in Hagen. (2013). Zahlen und Daten [Numbers and facts] Retrieved from https://www.fernuni-hagen.de/universitaet/profil/zahlen/index.shtml First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Giamo, L. S., Schmitt, M. T. & Outten, H. R. (2012). Perceived discrimination, group identification, and life satisfaction among multiracial people: A test of the rejection-identification model. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 18, 319–328. doi: 10.1037/a0029729 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hartmann, T. & Tanis, M. (2013). Examining the hostile media effect as an intergroup phenomenon: The role of in-group identification and status. Journal of Communication, 63, 535–555. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12031 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hinkle, S., Taylor, L. A., Fox-Cardamone, D. L. & Crook, K. F. (1989). Intragroup identification and intergroup differentiation: A multicomponent approach. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 305–317. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1989.tb00874.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Iacobucci, D. (2010). Structural equations modeling: Fit Indices, sample size, and advanced topics. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20, 90–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2009.09.003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jackson, J. W. (2002). Intergroup attitudes as a function of different dimensions of group identification and perceived intergroup conflict. Self and Identity, 1, 11–33. doi: 10.1080/152988602317232777 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W. & Sulloway, F. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kachel, S., Steffens, M. C. & Niedlich, C. (2015). Traditional masculinity and femininity: Validation of a new scale assessing gender roles. Unpublished manuscript. Landau: University of Koblenz-Landau. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kuppens, T., Yzerbyt, V. Y., Dandache, S., Fischer, A. H. & van der Schalk, J. (2013). Social identity salience shapes group-based emotions through group-based appraisals. Cognition and Emotion, 27, 1359–1377. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.785387 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Latrofa, M., Vaes, J., Cadinu, M. & Carnaghi, A. (2010). The cognitive representation of self-stereotyping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 911–922. doi: 10.1177/0146167210373907 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Leach, C., Van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M. W., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B., … Spears, R. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144–165. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Leach, C. W., Rodriguez Mosquera, P. M., Vliek, M. L. W. & Hirt, E. (2010). Group devaluation and group identification. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 535–552. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01661.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Luhtanen, R. & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302–318. doi: 10.1177/0146167292183006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Martiny, S. E., Roth, J., Jelenec, P., Steffens, M. C. & Croizet, J.-C. (2012). When a new group identity does harm on the spot: Stereotype threat in newly created groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 65–71. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.840 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Outten, H. R., Schmitt, M. T., Garcia, D. M. & Branscombe, N. R. (2009). Coping options: Missing links between minority group identification and psychological well-being. Applied Psychology, 58, 146–170. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00386.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Packer, D. J. (2014). On not airing our dirty laundry: Intergroup contexts suppress ingroup criticism among strongly identified group members. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 53, 93–111. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12017 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Phinney, J. S. (1992). The multigroup ethnic identity measure: A new scale for use with diverse groups. Journal of Adolescent Research, 7, 156–176. doi: 10.1177/074355489272003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A. & Jans, L. (2013). A single-item measure of social identification: Reliability, validity, and utility. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 597–617. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12006 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reysen, S., Katzarska-Miller, I., Nesbit, S. M. & Pierce, L. (2013). Further validation of a single‐item measure of social identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 463–470. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.1973 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., Schwartz, S., Halevy, N. & Eidelson, R. (2008). Toward a unifying model of identification with groups: Integrating theoretical perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 280–306. doi: 10.1177/1088868308319225 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roccas, S., Schwartz, S. H. & Amit, A. (2010). Personal value priorities and national identification. Political Psychology, 31, 393–419. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00763.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rudman, L. A. & Goodwin, S. A. (2004). Gender differences in automatic in-group bias: Why do women like women more than men like men? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 494–509. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.494 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Test of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research – Online, 8, 23–74. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schubert, T. & Otten, S. (2002). Overlap of self, in-group, and outgroup: Pictorial measures of self-categorization. Self & Identity, 1, 535–576. doi: 10.1080/152988602760328012 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, E. R., Murphy, J. & Coats, S. (1999). Attachment to groups: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 94–110. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.94 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, L. E., Amiot, C. E., Callan, V. J., Terry, D. J. & Smith, J. R. (2012). Getting new staff to stay: The mediating role of organizational identification. British Journal of Management, 23, 45–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00728.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223, 96–102. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican1170-96 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information/Sur Les Sciences Sociales, 13, 65–93. doi: 10.1177/053901847401300204 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. AustinS. WorchelEds., The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • van Dick, R., van Knippenberg, D., Hägele, S., Guillaume, Y. R. F. & Brodbeck, F. (2008). Group diversity and group identification: The moderating role of diversity beliefs. Human Relations, 61, 1463–1492. doi: 10.1177/0018726708095711 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Van Dick, R. & Wagner, U. (2002). Social identification among school teachers: Dimensions, foci, and correlates. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11, 129–149. doi: 10.1080/13594320143000889 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Stellmacher, J. & Christ, O. (2004). The utility of a broader conceptualization of organizational identification: Which aspects really matter?. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 171–191. doi: 10.1348/096317904774202135 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vignoles, V. L., Chryssochoou, X. & Breakwell, G. M. (2002). Evaluating models of identity motivation: Self-esteem is not the whole story. Self & Identity, 1, 201–218. doi: 10.1080/152988602760124847 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wang, J. & Wang, X. (2012). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus, Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • ZA & ZUMA. (2014). Links-Rechts-Selbsteinstufung [Left-right-Self-rating]. In D. DannerA. Glöckner-RistEds., Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen. doi: 10.6102/zis83 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar