Abstract
Abstract. This research examined whether threats to masculinity both inspired men’s efforts to reestablish their power over women via the promotion of ideologies that implicitly subordinate women and occurred when men were outperformed by women in masculine domains. Masculinity was threatened by telling men they scored like women on a gender knowledge test (Rudman & Fairchild, 2004), which sequentially led to more concern about how they were perceived by others, increased anger, and the increased endorsement of social dominance orientation (Study 1a) and benevolent sexism (Study 1b). Study 2 additionally shows that men experienced threats to masculinity when outperformed by women in masculine domains; when outperformed by a woman, men reported more concern about how they looked to others, which predicted increased anger and the subsequent sexualization of the woman. The findings link masculinity threats to the promotion of ideologies that implicitly subordinate women; the consequences of these linkages are discussed.
References
1985). A variance explanation paradox: When a little is a lot. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 129–133.
(1979). Compensatory masculine responding as a function of sex role. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 252–257.
(2005). The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 633–642. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.270
(2007). The sexual harassment of uppity women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 425–437.
(2010).
(The emergence of simple and complex power structures through social niche construction . In A. G. GuinoteT. K. VescioEds., The Social Psychology of Power (pp. 46–86). New York, NY: Guilford Press.2005). Role rigidity: A problem of identity misclassification? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 552.
(2011). Precarious manhood and its links to action and aggression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 82–86.
(2009). Precarious manhood and displays of physical aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 623–634.
(2012). Gender threats and men’s antigay behaviors: The harmful effects of asserting heterosexuality. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15, 471–486. doi: 1368430211432893
(1976).
(The male sex role: Our culture’s blueprint for manhood, what it’s done for us lately . In D. DavidR. BrannonEds., The fourty-nine percent majority: The male sex role (pp. 1–49). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1045–1060. doi: 10.1037/a0016239
(2011). From agents to objects: Sexist attitudes and neural responses to sexualized targets. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 540–551.
(2001). Voluntary facial expression and hemispheric asymmetry over the frontal cortex. Psychophysiology, 38, 912–925.
(1996). Insult, aggression, and the southern culture of honor: An “experimental ethnography”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 945–960.
(1995). Masculinities. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
(1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. UK Psychology Press: Hove, UK.
(2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598.
(1998). New directions for the study of gender role attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 371–384.
(1998). More on the structure of male role norms. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 135–155.
(2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902.
(1976). La volonté de savoir (Vol. 1). Paris, France: Gallimard.
(1959).
(The bases of social power . In D. CartwrightEd., Studies in Social Power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.2012). The effect of patronizing behavior and control on men and women’s performance in stereotypically masculine domains. Sex Roles, 66, 479–491.
(2011a). When what you see is what you get: The consequences of the objectifying gaze for women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 5–17.
(2011b). When are people interchangeable sexual objects? The effect of gender and body type on sexual fungibility. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 499–513.
(2012). Seeing women as objects: The sexual body part recognition bias. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 743–753.
(1990). Manhood in the making: Cultural concepts of masculinity. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
(1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
(1999).
(Sexism and other “isms”: Independence, status, and the ambivalent content of stereotypes . In W. B. SwannJ. H. LangloisL. A. GilbertEds., Sexism and stereotypes in modern society: The gender science of Janet Taylor Spence (pp. 193–221). Washington, DC: APA.2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118.
(2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling, [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
(2012). Social dominance orientation: Revisiting the structure and function of a variable predicting social and political attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 583–606. doi: 10.1177/0146167211432765
(1977). Human emotions (Vol. 17). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
(1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
(1994). The role of stereotyping in system‐justification and the production of false consciousness. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27.
(2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.
(2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498
(2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 126–136.
(2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209–232.
(2009). Guyland. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
(2003). A multicultural investigation of masculinity ideology and alexithymia. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 4, 91–99.
(2003). Sexual harassment under social identity threat: The computer harassment paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 853–870.
(2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
(1998). What develops in emotional development? New York, NY: Plenum Press.
(2011). Dude, you’re a fag: Masculinity and sexuality in high school, with a new preface. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
(1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
(2008). Contemporary approaches to assessing mediation in communication research. The Sage sourcebook of advanced data analysis methods for communication research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 13–54.
(2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16, 93–115.
(1992). When small effects are impressive. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 160–164.
(1998). Conceptualizing and measuring a power/interaction model of interpersonal influence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 307–332.
(2004). Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 157–176.
(2008). The social psychology of gender: How power and intimacy shape gender relations. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
(2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 165–179.
(2012). Eroticizing inequality in the United States: The consequences and determinants of traditional gender role adherence in intimate relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 168–183.
(1993). Studying the emotion-antecedent appraisal process: An expert system approach. Cognition & Emotion, 7, 325–355.
(2001). The good, the bad, and the manly: Threats to one’s prototypicality and evaluations of fellow in-group members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 510–517.
(2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445.
(2001). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
(2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 31–53. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00200
(1986). The structure of male role norms. American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 531–543. doi: 10.1177/000276486029005003
(2008). Precarious manhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1325–1339.
(2005). Power and the creation of patronizing environments: The stereotype-based behaviors of the powerful and their effects on female performance in masculine domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 658–672.
(2010). Power and sexism. The social psychology of power. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 363–380.
(2003). Power in stereotypically masculine domains: A social influence strategy X stereotype match model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1062–1078.
(2013). Eye of the beholder: Effects of perspective and sexual objectification on harassment judgments. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19, 206–221.
(2013). Overdoing gender A test of the masculine overcompensation thesis. American Journal of Sociology, 118, 980–1022.
(2005). The effects of subtle sexual harassment on women’s performance in a job interview. Sex Roles, 53, 67–77. doi: 10.1007/s11199-005-4279-4
(2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 197–206.
(