Skip to main content

How Threats to Masculinity Sequentially Cause Public Discomfort, Anger, and Ideological Dominance Over Women

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000248

Abstract. This research examined whether threats to masculinity both inspired men’s efforts to reestablish their power over women via the promotion of ideologies that implicitly subordinate women and occurred when men were outperformed by women in masculine domains. Masculinity was threatened by telling men they scored like women on a gender knowledge test (Rudman & Fairchild, 2004), which sequentially led to more concern about how they were perceived by others, increased anger, and the increased endorsement of social dominance orientation (Study 1a) and benevolent sexism (Study 1b). Study 2 additionally shows that men experienced threats to masculinity when outperformed by women in masculine domains; when outperformed by a woman, men reported more concern about how they looked to others, which predicted increased anger and the subsequent sexualization of the woman. The findings link masculinity threats to the promotion of ideologies that implicitly subordinate women; the consequences of these linkages are discussed.

References

  • Abelson, R. P. (1985). A variance explanation paradox: When a little is a lot. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 129–133. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Babl, J. D. (1979). Compensatory masculine responding as a function of sex role. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 252–257. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barreto, M. & Ellemers, N. (2005). The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 633–642. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.270 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Berdahl, J. L. (2007). The sexual harassment of uppity women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 425–437. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boehm, C. & Flack, J. C. (2010). The emergence of simple and complex power structures through social niche construction. In A. G. GuinoteT. K. VescioEds., The Social Psychology of Power (pp. 46–86). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bosson, J. K., Prewitt-Freilino, J. L. & Taylor, J. N. (2005). Role rigidity: A problem of identity misclassification? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 552. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bosson, J. K. & Vandello, J. A. (2011). Precarious manhood and its links to action and aggression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 82–86. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bosson, J. K., Vandello, J. A., Burnaford, R. M., Weaver, J. R. & Wasti, S. A. (2009). Precarious manhood and displays of physical aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 623–634. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bosson, J. K., Weaver, J. R., Caswell, T. A. & Burnaford, R. M. (2012). Gender threats and men’s antigay behaviors: The harmful effects of asserting heterosexuality. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15, 471–486. doi: 1368430211432893 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Brannon, R. (1976). The male sex role: Our culture’s blueprint for manhood, what it’s done for us lately. In D. DavidR. BrannonEds., The fourty-nine percent majority: The male sex role (pp. 1–49). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G. & Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1045–1060. doi: 10.1037/a0016239 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cikara, M., Eberhardt, J. L. & Fiske, S. T. (2011). From agents to objects: Sexist attitudes and neural responses to sexualized targets. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 540–551. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Coan, J. A., Allen, J. J. B. & Harmon‐Jones, E. (2001). Voluntary facial expression and hemispheric asymmetry over the frontal cortex. Psychophysiology, 38, 912–925. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, D., Nisbett, R. E., Bowdle, B. F. & Schwarz, N. (1996). Insult, aggression, and the southern culture of honor: An “experimental ethnography”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 945–960. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. UK Psychology Press: Hove, UK. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eagly, A. H. & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fischer, A. R. & Good, G. E. (1998). New directions for the study of gender role attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 371–384. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fischer, A. R., Tokar, D. M., Good, G. E. & Snell, A. F. (1998). More on the structure of male role norms. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 135–155. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P. & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Foucault, M. (1976). La volonté de savoir (Vol. 1). Paris, France: Gallimard. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • French, J. & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. CartwrightEd., Studies in Social Power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gervais, S. J. & Vescio, T. K. (2012). The effect of patronizing behavior and control on men and women’s performance in stereotypically masculine domains. Sex Roles, 66, 479–491. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gervais, S. J., Vescio, T. K. & Allen, J. (2011a). When what you see is what you get: The consequences of the objectifying gaze for women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 5–17. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gervais, S. J., Vescio, T. K. & Allen, J. (2011b). When are people interchangeable sexual objects? The effect of gender and body type on sexual fungibility. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 499–513. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gervais, S. J., Vescio, T. K., Förster, J., Maass, A. & Suitner, C. (2012). Seeing women as objects: The sexual body part recognition bias. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 743–753. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gilmore, D. D. (1990). Manhood in the making: Cultural concepts of masculinity. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Glick, P. & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Glick, P. & Fiske, S. T. (1999). Sexism and other “isms”: Independence, status, and the ambivalent content of stereotypes. In W. B. SwannJ. H. LangloisL. A. GilbertEds., Sexism and stereotypes in modern society: The gender science of Janet Taylor Spence (pp. 193–221). Washington, DC: APA. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Glick, P. & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling, [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Levin, S., Thomsen, L., Kteily, N. & Sheehy-Skeffington, J. (2012). Social dominance orientation: Revisiting the structure and function of a variable predicting social and political attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 583–606. doi: 10.1177/0146167211432765 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Izard, C. E. (1977). Human emotions (Vol. 17). New York, NY: Plenum Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Jost, J. T. & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system‐justification and the production of false consciousness. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W. & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jost, J. T. & Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A. & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 126–136. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jost, J. T. & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209–232. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kimmel, M. S. (2009). Guyland. New York, NY: Harper Collins. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Levant, R. F., Richmond, K., Majors, R. G., Inclan, J. E., Rossello, J. M., Heesacker, M., … Sellers, A. (2003). A multicultural investigation of masculinity ideology and alexithymia. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 4, 91–99. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Maass, A., Cadinu, M., Guarnieri, G. & Grasselli, A. (2003). Sexual harassment under social identity threat: The computer harassment paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 853–870. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Mascolo, M. F. & Griffin, S. E. (1998). What develops in emotional development? New York, NY: Plenum Press. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pascoe, C. J. (2011). Dude, you’re a fag: Masculinity and sexuality in high school, with a new preface. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M. & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Preacher, K. J. & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Contemporary approaches to assessing mediation in communication research. The Sage sourcebook of advanced data analysis methods for communication research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 13–54. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Preacher, K. J. & Kelley, K. (2011). Effect size measures for mediation models: Quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychological Methods, 16, 93–115. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Prentice, D. A. & Miller, D. T. (1992). When small effects are impressive. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 160–164. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Raven, B. H., Schwarzwald, J. & Koslowsky, M. (1998). Conceptualizing and measuring a power/interaction model of interpersonal influence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 307–332. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rudman, L. A. & Fairchild, K. (2004). Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 157–176. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rudman, L. A. & Glick, P. (2008). The social psychology of gender: How power and intimacy shape gender relations. New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E. & Nauts, S. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 165–179. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sanchez, D. T., Fetterolf, J. C. & Rudman, L. A. (2012). Eroticizing inequality in the United States: The consequences and determinants of traditional gender role adherence in intimate relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 49, 168–183. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Scherer, K. R. (1993). Studying the emotion-antecedent appraisal process: An expert system approach. Cognition & Emotion, 7, 325–355. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmitt, M. T. & Branscombe, N. R. (2001). The good, the bad, and the manly: Threats to one’s prototypicality and evaluations of fellow in-group members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 510–517. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Shrout, P. E. & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sidanius, J. & Pratto, F. (2001). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Swim, J. K., Hyers, L. L., Cohen, L. L. & Ferguson, M. J. (2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 31–53. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00200 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thompson, E. H. & Pleck, J. H. (1986). The structure of male role norms. American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 531–543. doi: 10.1177/000276486029005003 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vandello, J. A., Bosson, J. K., Cohen, D., Burnaford, R. M. & Weaver, J. R. (2008). Precarious manhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1325–1339. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vescio, T. K., Gervais, S. J., Snyder, M. & Hoover, A. (2005). Power and the creation of patronizing environments: The stereotype-based behaviors of the powerful and their effects on female performance in masculine domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 658–672. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vescio, T. K., Schlenker, K. A. & Lenes, J. G. (2010). Power and sexism. The social psychology of power. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 363–380. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Vescio, T. K., Snyder, M. & Butz, D. A. (2003). Power in stereotypically masculine domains: A social influence strategy X stereotype match model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1062–1078. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wiener, R. L., Gervais, S. J., Allen, J. & Marquez, A. (2013). Eye of the beholder: Effects of perspective and sexual objectification on harassment judgments. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19, 206–221. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Willer, R., Rogalin, C. L., Conlon, B. & Wojnowicz, M. T. (2013). Overdoing gender A test of the masculine overcompensation thesis. American Journal of Sociology, 118, 980–1022. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Woodzicka, J. A. & LaFrance, M. (2005). The effects of subtle sexual harassment on women’s performance in a job interview. Sex Roles, 53, 67–77. doi: 10.1007/s11199-005-4279-4 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G. & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 197–206. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar